WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC. annual report, FY2012

WEC Energy Group, Inc. (Wisconsin Energy Corporation) — 2012 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The filing’s registrant is Wisconsin Energy Corporation; the requested “2012 Q4” is covered within this annual report. Amounts are in U.S. dollars.

Business context and reporting period

The company operates regulated electric, natural-gas and steam utilities in Wisconsin and Michigan, primarily through We Energies, alongside We Power’s long-term generation leases and a smaller non-utility business. The utility served about 1.126 million electric customers and 1.074 million gas customers at year-end. All four Power the Future generation plants were in service.

Financial performance and liquidity

Metric20122011
Operating revenue$4,246.4 million$4,486.4 million
Operating income$1,000.3 million$887.3 million
Net income$546.3 million$526.2 million
Diluted EPS$2.35$2.24 total; $2.18 continuing operations
Operating cash flow$1,173.9 million$993.4 million
Capital expenditures$707.0 million$830.8 million
  • Revenue declined about 5.4%, while operating income rose about 12.7% and net income about 3.8%. Continuing-operations income was $546.3 million, up from $512.8 million; 2011 also included $13.4 million of discontinued-operations income.
  • Utility operating income rose to $647.7 million from $544.8 million, mainly because of lower operation and maintenance and fuel/purchased-power costs. Non-utility operating income increased to $358.8 million from $348.9 million.
  • Electric gross margin was $2,103.6 million versus $2,052.1 million. Gas gross margin fell to $416.8 million from $452.5 million, primarily due to warmer winter weather and lower retail deliveries. Lower natural-gas commodity costs reduced reported gas revenue and gas cost of sales.
  • Cash used in investing activities was $729.6 million; cash used in financing was $422.8 million. Year-end cash and cash equivalents were $35.6 million.
  • Year-end long-term debt, including current maturities, was $4,865.9 million; short-term debt was $394.6 million. Debt to total capitalization was 55.8% on the company’s GAAP presentation (53.2% on its rating-agency-adjusted presentation). Current liabilities exceeded current assets by about $129.4 million, including $412.1 million of current long-term debt maturities.
  • Available undrawn credit facilities were approximately $1.2 billion, supporting $394.6 million of commercial paper. The company reported compliance with credit-facility covenants.
  • Fourth quarter: Revenue was $1,071.2 million versus $1,113.2 million in Q4 2011; operating income was $201.4 million versus $193.0 million; continuing-operations income was $98.8 million versus $114.1 million; diluted EPS was $0.43 versus $0.49.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Higher 2012 earnings reflected utility cost reductions, including a one-year suspension of $148 million in amortization of certain regulatory assets authorized in the 2012 rate arrangement. Management expected the amortization to resume in 2013.
  • Electric sales fell 3.4% overall; retail sales were nearly flat. Warmer weather, lower wholesale/resale activity, a planned outage at a major iron-ore customer and two large customers’ move to self-generation affected sales and revenue.
  • Gas utility revenue fell to $962.6 million from $1,181.2 million, while deliveries increased 3.2% to 2,222.0 million therms, largely reflecting increased transported gas for electric generation.
  • Depreciation and amortization increased to $364.2 million from $330.2 million as more utility assets entered service. Net interest expense rose to $248.2 million from $235.8 million, partly because less interest was capitalized after projects entered service.
  • Capital spending declined as Oak Creek air-control equipment entered service. Year-end construction work in progress fell to $315.9 million from $921.3 million.

Outlook, commentary, risks and contingencies

  • Management forecast 2013 non-utility segment operating income of $360 million to $365 million and total capital expenditures of $692.7 million. It expected the 2013 effective tax rate to be 37%–38%.
  • Management forecast annual retail electric sales growth of 0.5%–1.0% over five years, excluding the two iron-ore mines, assuming normal weather and economic improvement; retail gas deliveries were forecast to remain flat over five years.
  • The PSCW-approved 2013 Wisconsin rates included a net $70 million (2.6%) non-fuel electric rate increase, offset in part by anticipated biomass grant proceeds; forecast fuel recovery added about $44 million. Wisconsin gas rates decreased for both Wisconsin Electric and Wisconsin Gas. The order retained allowed returns on equity of 10.4% and 10.5%, respectively.
  • The Rothschild biomass project was targeted for completion by year-end 2013, at an estimated $245 million–$255 million excluding AFUDC. The company expected a roughly $72 million federal grant; the rate order incorporated anticipated grant proceeds, making timing and eligibility important.
  • Planned conversion of Valley Power Plant from coal to natural gas was estimated at $60 million–$65 million, subject to approvals, with completion expected by late 2015 or early 2016. A western Wisconsin gas lateral was estimated at $150 million–$170 million, with regulatory approval anticipated to be sought in 2013.
  • Environmental regulation remains a significant uncertainty, including air-emissions, water-discharge and coal-combustion-product rules. The company estimated $8.0 million–$12.5 million to comply with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, with expected PIPP work to be funded by Wolverine under a proposed joint-ownership arrangement subject to approvals.
  • Paris Generating Station units 1 and 4 were ordered out of service following a January 2013 environmental notice and order; management expected them to remain unavailable until at least 2014 and said fines or penalties were possible. The company was evaluating replacement generation and reliability effects.
  • At the Oak Creek site, a 2011 bluff collapse was reconstructed and stabilized, and WDNR closure was received for related storm-water work. The Wisconsin DOJ was considering alleged storm-water and solid-waste violations, and management anticipated possible fines. The WDNR’s groundwater study was inconclusive about the source of nearby impacts.
  • Other risks include weather and demand variability, fuel and purchased-power costs, rate-case outcomes and regulatory recovery, project delays, labor negotiations (all labor agreements were scheduled to expire in 2013), pension funding, capital-market access, cyber threats and credit-rating changes. Estimated collateral or termination payments under certain agreements following a downgrade below specified investment-grade thresholds were $225.7 million.
  • Management stated it believed liquidity was adequate and environmental remediation costs beyond accrued/disclosed amounts were not expected to be material based on available information. Manufactured-gas-plant investigation and remediation costs were estimated at $16 million–$62 million over ten years, with $38.2 million reserved at year-end.
  • The independent auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the biomass facility was completed on schedule and the expected grant was received, and how customer bill credits affected earnings and rates.
  • Actual 2013 rate-case recovery, especially resumption or extension of regulatory-asset amortization and fuel-cost recovery.
  • Resolution of the Paris units’ outage, environmental proceedings and any replacement-power costs or penalties.
  • Approvals, financing and cost allocation for the PIPP environmental-control joint ownership and the Valley Power Plant conversion.
  • Cash flow, debt maturities, credit-facility availability and any changes in collateral requirements or ratings.
  • Developments in environmental rules, remediation exposures, pension assumptions and labor negotiations that could change costs or capital requirements.