El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. annual report, FY2017

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. — FY2017 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 27, 2017 (52 weeks). The filing also reports fourth-quarter results. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are converted from thousands to millions unless otherwise noted.

Business context and reporting period

El Pollo Loco operates and franchises fire-grilled chicken restaurants. At year-end, its system comprised 477 restaurants: 212 company-operated and 265 franchised, primarily in California. About 73% of fiscal 2017 revenue came from the greater Los Angeles area. The company operates in one segment.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY2017FY2016Change
Total revenue$401.7 million$380.1 millionUp 5.7%
Company-operated restaurant revenue$376.6 million$355.5 millionUp 5.9%
Franchise revenue$25.1 million$24.7 millionUp 1.7%
Operating income$6.8 million$34.6 millionDown 80.3%
Net income$8.6 million$18.3 millionDown 53.0%
Diluted earnings per share$0.22$0.47Down
Operating cash flow$53.7 million$49.3 millionUp
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$8.6 million$2.2 millionUp
Total debt, including capital leases$93.3 million$104.5 millionDown
  • System-wide sales, including franchised restaurant sales, were $841.8 million, up 5.8%. System comparable sales grew 1.5%; company-operated comparable sales rose 1.0% as 1.9% higher average checks offset a 0.9% transaction decline.
  • Company-operated restaurant contribution was $74.5 million; its margin fell to 19.8% from 20.5%. GAAP operating margin was 1.7% and net margin was 2.1%.
  • Adjusted EBITDA was $65.3 million, approximately flat with $65.6 million in 2016. This non-GAAP measure includes significant adjustments, notably impairment and closed-store charges.
  • Capital expenditures were approximately $36.2 million, including $24.1 million for new restaurants, $5.7 million for remodels and $6.4 million for maintenance and other corporate projects. Operating cash flow less investing cash outflow was approximately $17.4 million.
  • The $200 million revolving facility had $93.0 million drawn, $7.7 million in outstanding letters of credit and $99.3 million available at year-end. The company reported compliance with all debt covenants. The facility matures in December 2019; borrowings carried a 3.3% rate at year-end.
  • Current assets of $20.7 million were below current liabilities of $47.3 million. Contractual operating lease payments totaled approximately $298.1 million, before sublease income.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Revenue growth reflected new restaurant openings and modest comparable-sales growth. Company-operated sales from new restaurants contributed $20.9 million; comparable sales added approximately $3.4 million.
  • Operating income declined sharply, principally because asset impairment and closed-store reserves rose to $33.6 million from $8.6 million. The charge included $27.7 million for the remaining capitalized assets of company-operated Texas restaurants; the company also impaired restaurants in Arizona and California.
  • Company restaurant expenses rose 7.0%, faster than company-operated revenue, with labor and related expenses up 9.3%. Labor costs reflected California minimum-wage increases and new-unit staffing; occupancy and other operating costs also increased.
  • Net income benefited from a $5.6 million income-tax-receivable-agreement (TRA) accounting benefit, compared with a $0.4 million expense in 2016. The 2017 tax provision was $0.5 million, including effects of the Tax Act and a lower federal corporate tax rate taking effect in 2018.
  • Year-end debt declined from $104.5 million to $93.3 million. The company paid $11.1 million under the TRA during 2017 and reported an accrued TRA obligation of approximately $22.0 million at year-end.

Outlook, management commentary, risks and unusual items

  • For fiscal 2018, management planned to open 6–8 company-operated and 6–8 franchised restaurants, fewer total openings than in 2017. No numerical comparable-sales, revenue or earnings guidance is provided in the filing.
  • Management said results in newer markets, especially Houston and Dallas–Fort Worth, were below expectations and that growth there would slow. Two Texas restaurants were closed in January 2018 and a third Texas development was abandoned; the company expected a $3.0 million closed-store reserve in first-quarter 2018.
  • After year-end, the company made an $8.0 million prepayment on the revolving facility and received an additional $1.6 million of insurance proceeds related to prior securities-litigation legal costs.
  • A Lancaster franchisee lawsuit produced a jury verdict for the plaintiffs on a good-faith-and-fair-dealing claim. Damages were not determined, and the company said it could not reasonably estimate a range. It intended to challenge the verdict and, if necessary, appeal. Securities class-action and wage-and-hour litigation also remain outstanding; the SEC had closed its earlier inquiry.
  • Other key risks include exposure to California labor costs, chicken and other input prices, reliance on a primary distributor and concentrated suppliers, geographic concentration, franchisee performance, food safety, and variable-rate debt. The company had fixed prices for all planned 2018 poultry purchases, but noted that costs and availability remain risks.
  • Bernard Acoca was appointed CEO effective March 12, 2018, succeeding retiring CEO Stephen Sather. The filing describes substantial sign-on compensation and equity awards for the incoming CEO.
  • Management reported that previously identified internal-control material weaknesses had been remediated by September 2017 and that internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls were effective at year-end. The independent auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements but did not audit internal-control effectiveness.
  • The company disclosed adoption of the new lease accounting standard would materially increase reported assets and liabilities, while it did not expect a material change in lease expense. It expected revenue-standard adoption to shift recognition of certain franchise and development fees over contract terms.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the large 2017 impairment charge signals continuing weakness in Texas, Arizona or Northern California, and whether further closures or impairments follow.
  • Whether comparable-sales growth can improve through transaction gains rather than check increases alone, and whether restaurant contribution margins stabilize amid wage and occupancy pressure.
  • Progress against the reduced 2018 opening plan and performance of newer-market restaurants and franchise development commitments.
  • The ultimate outcome and potential financial exposure from the Lancaster verdict and the outstanding securities and employment-related litigation.
  • Liquidity and refinancing capacity ahead of the 2019 revolving-credit maturity, including lease commitments, TRA payments and covenant headroom.
  • Whether the incoming CEO transition and new strategic direction deliver improved operating performance; also review the CEO employment and incentive terms.