NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2016

Norwood Financial Corp. — Q2 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016. Norwood is a bank holding company whose principal subsidiary is Wayne Bank. Unless noted otherwise, amounts below are in millions of dollars.

Financial results and position

MetricQ2 2016Q2 2015Six months 2016Six months 2015
Net interest income$6.394$6.049$12.569$12.356
Provision for loan losses$0.700$0.420$1.150$1.040
Other income$1.223$1.133$2.290$2.412
Other expenses$4.528$4.168$8.876$8.355
Net income$1.878$1.963$3.754$4.004
EPS, basic / diluted$0.51 / $0.51$0.53 / $0.53$1.02 / $1.02$1.09 / $1.08
Tax-equivalent net interest margin3.79%3.68%3.74%3.81%

The filing does not report a conventional total revenue line; interest income was $7.234 million for Q2 and $14.260 million for the first half. Q2 return on average assets/equity was 0.99%/7.28%, versus 1.06%/7.80%; first-half returns were 0.99%/7.31%, versus 1.11%/8.01%.

  • Balance sheet at June 30: Assets were $767.8 million, up $17.3 million from year-end 2015, mainly from $21.3 million loan growth. Loans were $581.2 million; deposits were $584.3 million; shareholders’ equity was $104.6 million.
  • Funding and debt: Short-term borrowings were $38.1 million and other borrowings $36.6 million, totaling $74.7 million, down from $94.4 million at year-end. Deposits increased $33.4 million; non-interest-bearing demand deposits rose $13.9 million.
  • Cash flow and liquidity: First-half operating cash flow was $4.5 million, investing cash outflow $13.0 million and financing cash inflow $11.1 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended at $12.6 million. Cash plus available-for-sale securities totaled $142.3 million, or 18.5% of assets, compared with $148.9 million, or 19.8%, at year-end. Management considered liquidity adequate.
  • Capital: Consolidated Tier 1 leverage was 12.23%; Tier 1 and Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based ratios were each 15.64%; total risk-based capital was 16.62%. The company reported compliance with applicable capital requirements and the capital conservation buffer.

Changes, credit quality, and unusual items

  • Q2 net income declined $85,000 year over year; management attributed the decrease primarily to a $280,000 higher loan-loss provision and $200,000 higher foreclosed-real-estate expense. First-half net income fell $250,000, with higher salaries and benefits and other operating expenses cited as key factors.
  • Average loans supported higher interest income and Q2 margin, while the first-half margin decreased year over year. First-half net interest income rose $213,000, but first-half other income fell $122,000.
  • Net charge-offs were $2.65 million for the first half, versus $968,000 a year earlier; $2.419 million related to one relationship foreclosed in Q2. The allowance fell to $5.798 million, or 1.00% of loans, from $7.298 million, or 1.30%, at year-end.
  • Nonperforming loans decreased to $1.193 million (0.21% of loans) from $7.132 million (1.27%) at year-end. Nonperforming assets were $6.607 million (0.86% of assets), as foreclosed real estate rose to $5.414 million from $2.847 million. The company reported $2.519 million of write-downs on loans previously identified as troubled debt restructurings; one $2.5 million TDR loan was transferred to foreclosed real estate.
  • Available-for-sale securities declined to $129.7 million from $138.9 million. First-half other comprehensive income of $2.35 million primarily reflected unrealized securities gains; management cautioned that these values can fluctuate with interest rates and spreads.
  • Acquisition after quarter-end: On July 31, 2016, Norwood completed its acquisition of Delaware Bancshares. At June 30, Delaware reported $378.3 million of assets, $327.5 million of deposits and $24.1 million of equity. Consideration was approximately $3.859 million cash and 431,605 Norwood shares. Norwood also assumed Delaware’s junior subordinated debt associated with $8.0 million of trust preferred securities, bearing variable interest at LIBOR plus 2.4% and maturing in 2038.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management said modeled net interest income exposure to a plus or minus 200-basis-point rate change was within policy limits; policy permits no more than an 8% decline. The 90-day interest-sensitivity gap was positive $65.4 million, which management said could allow asset yields to reprice faster than funding costs in a rising-rate environment over that interval. This is a sensitivity measure, not a forecast.

Principal disclosed risks include loan losses exceeding the allowance, commercial lending and real estate collateral exposure, regional economic conditions, interest-rate and liquidity risks, acquisition integration and realization of expected benefits, capital availability, regulation, competition, cybersecurity and potential dilution from share issuance. Commercial rentals and hospitality/lodging were the largest disclosed industry concentrations at 8.8% and 8.7% of loans, respectively.

A lawsuit filed against Delaware alleged breach of an investment-banking right-of-first-refusal agreement and sought damages exceeding $500,000. Delaware denied the claims and counterclaimed for damages exceeding $1.0 million; Norwood said it considered the claims meritless and intended to defend and pursue the counterclaim. Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the lower allowance, elevated first-half charge-offs and growth in foreclosed real estate adequately reflect credit risk, particularly in commercial real estate and the foreclosed relationship.
  • The acquisition’s final accounting, integration costs, capital and funding effects, and whether anticipated benefits are realized; the reported June 30 statements predate the July 31 closing.
  • How deposit pricing, borrowing costs and interest-rate movements affect margins, liquidity and securities values.
  • The outcome and potential financial impact of the Delaware litigation, which was pending when the filing was signed.