PARKE BANCORP, INC. quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Parke Bancorp, Inc. 2013 Q3 Form 10-Q Summary

Business Context and Reporting Period

Parke Bancorp, Inc. is a New Jersey bank holding company whose principal subsidiary, Parke Bank, operates branches in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The unaudited filing covers the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, with comparisons to the corresponding 2012 periods and to December 31, 2012 for balance-sheet measures.

The Bank remained subject to 2012 FDIC and New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance Consent Orders addressing delinquent and classified assets, loan review, lending policies, and credit concentrations. The Company also remained subject to a Federal Reserve memorandum of understanding requiring, among other things, a capital plan and restrictions on certain dividends, redemptions, and debt transactions. Management stated that it was in substantial compliance with both arrangements.

Key Financial Metrics

MetricThree Months Ended September 30Nine Months Ended September 30
Net interest income$7.7 million, versus $7.3 million$22.8 million, versus $22.9 million
Net income available to common shareholders$1.8 million, versus $1.5 million$5.4 million, versus $4.6 million
Basic and diluted EPS$0.30, versus $0.25$0.90, versus $0.78
Provision for loan losses$0.2 million, versus $1.5 million$2.2 million, versus $5.8 million
Total noninterest income$1.5 million, versus $1.0 million$3.4 million, versus $2.6 million
Total noninterest expense$5.4 million, versus $3.5 million$13.4 million, versus $11.0 million

For the nine-month period, income before taxes was $10.7 million and income tax expense was $4.2 million, producing a 39.1% effective tax rate. For the quarter, income before taxes was $3.5 million and income tax expense was $1.4 million, producing a 39.1% effective tax rate.

  • Total assets were $747.1 million at September 30, 2013, down 3.0% from $770.5 million at December 31, 2012.
  • Gross loans were $660.7 million, up 4.9% from $629.7 million at year-end 2012. Net loans were $641.0 million after a $19.7 million allowance.
  • Deposits were $611.4 million, down 4.0% from $637.2 million, primarily from planned runoff of higher-priced certificates of deposit.
  • Cash and cash equivalents declined to $21.6 million from $76.9 million, primarily because of deposit runoff and increased loan production.
  • FHLBNY borrowings were $30.3 million, compared with $20.4 million at December 31, 2012. Other borrowed funds declined to zero from $10.0 million.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $87.7 million and total equity was $86.7 million at September 30, 2013.
  • The loan-to-deposit ratio increased to 108.1% from 98.8% at year-end 2012.
  • Net interest margin increased to 4.35% for the quarter from 3.96% and to 4.31% for the nine months from 4.15% in the comparable periods.
  • Operating cash flow was $7.8 million for the nine months, compared with $11.1 million in 2012. Investing activities used $33.9 million and financing activities used $29.2 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $55.3 million during the period.

Material Changes Versus Comparable Periods

  • Net income available to common shareholders increased 17.1% for the nine months and 20.6% for the quarter.
  • Interest income declined because loan yields fell, despite higher average loan balances. Average loan yield declined to 5.57% from 6.01% for the nine months and to 5.39% from 5.74% for the quarter.
  • Interest expense fell 22.5% for the nine months and 25.0% for the quarter, reflecting lower deposit pricing and lower average deposit balances.
  • The loan-loss provision declined substantially, consistent with management’s assessment of improved loan-portfolio stability and modest charge-offs.
  • Noninterest income benefited from higher SBA loan-sale gains and fees, BOLI income, lower OREO losses, and a $275,000 lawsuit settlement related to improper handling of a closing.
  • Noninterest expense increased primarily because of higher OREO expenses, including a $1.2 million partial write-down of two OREO properties, higher real-estate taxes, and increased compensation and benefits.
  • Nonaccrual loans declined to $41.1 million, or 6.2% of total loans, from $47.5 million, or 7.6%, at December 31, 2012. Total delinquent loans declined to $43.9 million, or 6.6% of loans, from $56.0 million.
  • OREO increased to $27.9 million from $26.1 million despite $3.6 million of property sales, reflecting $6.9 million of real estate acquired in settlement of loans and a $1.2 million OREO allowance.
  • The allowance for loan losses increased to $19.7 million from $18.9 million, while the allowance-to-loans ratio remained 3.0%. Net charge-offs were approximately $1.5 million for the nine months.
  • The Company redeemed the remaining TARP warrant in June 2013 for approximately $1.7 million. It also paid a 10% common-stock dividend in May 2013.

Credit Quality, Liquidity, Capital, Outlook and Risks

  • Impaired loans totaled $80.3 million at September 30, 2013, with related allowances of $2.2 million. Performing TDRs totaled $39.2 million and nonperforming TDRs totaled $21.6 million.
  • Commercial real estate and construction lending remained significant concentrations. Substandard loans totaled $64.9 million, compared with $80.9 million at December 31, 2012.
  • OREO and collateral-dependent impaired loans were carried using Level 3 valuation inputs and are sensitive to appraisals, collateral values, estimated selling costs, cash flows, and market conditions.
  • Available-for-sale securities included $4.0 million of collateralized debt obligations classified as Level 3, with $1.1 million of unrealized losses. Management recognized no credit-related OTTI charges during the nine or three months ended September 30, 2013, but the valuations depend on assumptions regarding defaults, deferrals, prepayments, loss severity, and discount rates.
  • Management stated that the Company and Bank were well-capitalized. At September 30, 2013, Parke Bank reported total risk-based capital of 16.27%, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 14.99%, and Tier 1 leverage capital of 13.51%.
  • The Company maintained $88.3 million of FHLB credit lines, of which $30.3 million was outstanding at September 30, 2013. Management stated that it was not aware of trends or commitments reasonably likely to cause a material change in liquidity.
  • Principal risks include local economic weakness, real-estate-market conditions, unemployment, borrower defaults, collateral-value declines, interest-rate changes, deposit runoff, reliance on borrowed funding, regulatory restrictions, and potential additional loan-loss or OREO provisions.
  • Management emphasized continued efforts to resolve nonperforming assets through foreclosure, loan workouts, updated appraisals, and enhanced credit monitoring. The filing provides no formal earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting. No material litigation was reported beyond ordinary-course matters.

Important Facts for Investors to Verify

  • Whether nonaccrual loans, TDRs, OREO, and commercial real estate concentrations continue to decline and whether collateral appraisals support recorded values.
  • Whether the $19.7 million allowance for loan losses remains adequate as loan balances grow and regulatory examinations continue.
  • Whether deposit runoff and the 108.1% loan-to-deposit ratio create a sustained need for FHLB or other wholesale funding.
  • Whether OREO write-downs, real-estate taxes, legal expenses, and other workout costs continue to pressure earnings.
  • Whether the Consent Orders and Federal Reserve MOU are modified, terminated, or result in additional restrictions on dividends, capital actions, management changes, or debt transactions.
  • The recoverability of Level 3 CDO investments and the sensitivity of fair values to default, deferral, prepayment, loss-severity, and discount-rate assumptions.
  • Whether improved net interest margins and lower credit provisions are sustainable despite lower loan yields and the absence of formal company guidance.