PARK OHIO HOLDINGS CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — Q3 2011 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The interim financial statements are unaudited; Ernst & Young performed a review, not an audit. Park-Ohio operates Supply Technologies, Aluminum Products, and Manufactured Products.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2011Q3 2010Nine months 2011Nine months 2010
Net sales$243.5 million$203.0 million$732.0 million$593.0 million
Gross profit / margin$41.8 million / 17.2%$35.0 million / 17.2%$129.0 million / 17.6%$97.6 million / 16.5%
Operating income$10.3 million$9.3 million$42.9 million$28.6 million
Net income$2.9 million$6.2 million$10.5 million$11.7 million
Diluted EPS$0.24$0.52$0.87$0.99

For the nine months, Supply Technologies sales rose 27% to $373.6 million and Manufactured Products sales rose 36% to $255.6 million; Aluminum Products sales fell 6% to $102.8 million. Segment growth reflected higher volumes and contributions from acquisitions, while Aluminum Products was affected by completed automotive contracts. Management attributed about $10.4 million of nine-month sales growth to price increases.

Nine-month SG&A was $80.7 million, up 23%, but remained 11.0% of sales. Q3 SG&A increased 18% to $26.2 million and was 10.8% of sales. Nine-month interest expense rose to $26.3 million from $18.1 million, including $7.3 million in debt-extinguishment costs. Q3 interest expense was $6.2 million versus $6.5 million. The 2011 nine-month tax rate was 36.6%; management estimated a full-year reported rate of approximately 34%. The higher reported nine-month rate included a $2.1 million foreign tax provision related to retiring affiliate-held notes.

Cash flow, liquidity, and debt

  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $26.1 million, down from $49.7 million. Capital expenditures were $9.5 million, compared with $2.2 million in 2010.
  • Cash increased $35.3 million to $70.6 million at September 30, 2011; $63.0 million was held by foreign subsidiaries. Working capital was $270.4 million, up from $219.2 million, and the current ratio was 2.38.
  • Total debt was $346.0 million, versus $302.5 million at year-end 2010. It included $250.0 million of 8.125% senior notes due 2021 and $91.2 million drawn on the revolving facility. Unused revolver availability was approximately $74.0 million under a facility of up to $200 million, with a possible additional $50 million.
  • The April 2011 refinancing issued the senior notes, redeemed the 8.375% subordinated notes, and repaid term loans. The company reported compliance with its debt covenants and a 1.9 debt-service coverage ratio at quarter-end. Management expected available resources and operating cash to meet requirements for at least 12 months.

Material changes, outlook, and risks

  • Q3 sales rose 20%, but net income fell to $2.9 million. The quarter included a $5.4 million impairment charge for abandoned long-lived assets in the underperforming rubber products business. The nine-month comparison also includes the $7.3 million refinancing-related extinguishment charge; 2010 results included a $2.2 million acquisition gain.
  • Management said higher commodity prices were expected to persist through year-end and that higher production improved fixed-cost absorption in Manufactured Products. No specific sales or earnings forecast was provided. Management expected to remain covenant-compliant, while warning that lower sales or economic deterioration could threaten covenant compliance and borrowing availability.
  • Key exposures include substantial indebtedness and interest-rate changes, cyclical automotive and heavy-duty truck demand, commodity and component availability/pricing, customer credit risk, acquisition integration, and variable capital-equipment order timing. A 100-basis-point rate increase was estimated to add about $0.7 million of interest expense for the nine-month period.
  • The company disclosed approximately 300 asbestos cases involving about 1,230 plaintiffs and an arbitration in South Africa in which Evraz seeks $20.8 million; Park-Ohio subsidiary ATM asserts a $2.7 million counterclaim. Management intends to defend the claims and does not expect the matters to have a material adverse effect, but stated that litigation outcomes are uncertain. For other contingencies, the filing says an excess-loss range cannot be estimated clearly.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether operating cash flow, working capital, and revolver availability remain adequate as sales and customer collections change.
  • Debt covenant headroom, refinancing costs, and the effect of floating-rate borrowings and the 8.125% notes on future interest expense.
  • Whether the rubber-products impairment signals further losses or restructuring needs, and whether Aluminum Products can offset contract-related sales declines.
  • How much reported growth is attributable to acquisitions, pricing, and underlying volume, and whether margins are sustainable.
  • Developments in the asbestos litigation and Evraz arbitration, along with potential tax consequences if foreign earnings or cash are repatriated.