Recon Technology, Ltd annual report, Q4 FY2026

Recon Technology, Ltd. — FY2026 Form 20-F Summary

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended June 30, 2026. The Cayman Islands holding company reports under U.S. GAAP; its principal operations are in China, primarily through contractual variable interest entity (VIE) arrangements. Amounts below are in RMB unless otherwise stated. Share and per-share amounts reflect the 1-for-200 Class A reverse split effective August 18, 2026, unless noted.

Business context and results

Recon supplies petroleum-industry automation products and software, equipment, and oilfield environmental services. It is also developing a waste-plastic chemical-recycling business. Revenue rose 65.8%, primarily from overseas oilfield projects, while the company remained loss-making and used cash in operations.

MetricFY2026FY2025Change
RevenueRMB 109.9 million ($16.2 million)RMB 66.3 million+65.8%
Gross profit / marginRMB 36.5 million / 33.2%RMB 15.2 million / 23.0%Margin +10.2 percentage points
Operating lossRMB 41.2 millionRMB 57.3 millionLoss narrowed
Net lossRMB 31.6 millionRMB 43.7 millionLoss narrowed 27.6%
Net loss attributable to ReconRMB 29.7 millionRMB 42.6 millionLoss narrowed 30.4%
Operating cash flowUse of RMB 58.8 millionUse of RMB 33.8 millionGreater cash use
Investing cash flowUse of RMB 128.9 millionSource of RMB 33.7 millionShift to substantial use
Financing cash flowSource of RMB 119.7 millionUse of RMB 3.3 millionMainly equity proceeds

Revenue, margins and material changes

  • Automation products and software revenue increased 104.5% to RMB 69.8 million. Overseas projects added RMB 44.2 million, partly offset by an RMB 8.6 million decline in domestic business. This segment’s gross margin rose to 32.3%, with management attributing the improvement to higher-margin overseas work.
  • Equipment and accessories revenue increased 51.2% to RMB 27.9 million. Oilfield environmental-protection revenue rose 19.4% to RMB 12.3 million; its margin improved to 53.4%, partly because prior-year testing-project equipment costs had been expensed.
  • Platform-outsourcing revenue fell to zero from RMB 3.5 million. FGS lost third-party cooperation with a major client, Sinopec, following that client’s policy shift; FGS’s active business declined to zero by June 2026.
  • Operating expenses rose 7.1% to RMB 77.7 million. G&A increased 11.8% to RMB 55.5 million, including higher FGS severance costs and deferred financing costs. R&D expense fell 21.7% to RMB 12.9 million.
  • The company recorded RMB 4.1 million of net credit-loss provision, compared with a RMB 2.9 million recovery in FY2025, including a full allowance against a third-party loan.

Financial position, liquidity and capital

  • At June 30, 2026, cash was RMB 29.7 million and short-term investments RMB 9.0 million, versus cash of RMB 98.9 million and short-term investments of RMB 3.6 million a year earlier. Working capital declined to RMB 145.2 million from RMB 295.6 million.
  • Total assets were RMB 639.4 million; current assets were RMB 229.0 million and current liabilities RMB 83.7 million. Total liabilities were RMB 87.0 million. Attributable shareholders’ equity was RMB 566.3 million; total equity including non-controlling interests was RMB 552.4 million.
  • Cash used in investing included RMB 52.7 million of construction-in-progress payments and RMB 166.2 million of new third-party loans, partly offset by RMB 96.4 million of loan repayments. Financing cash inflow primarily reflected net proceeds from share issuance.
  • Reported borrowings included RMB 11.3 million of short-term bank loans and RMB 20.0 million of short-term related-party borrowings. Lease liabilities totaled RMB 6.2 million. The contractual-obligations table lists RMB 31.3 million of debt obligations and RMB 30.6 million of purchase commitments due principally within one year.
  • Third-party loans totaled RMB 330.0 million, approximately 52% of assets: RMB 46.4 million short-term and RMB 283.7 million long-term. This includes RMB 262.0 million lent for industrial-park projects at 4.2%–4.5% interest with 20-year terms; the filing says these loans are collateralized by project land-use rights. Management reports aggregate collateral fair value of about RMB 800 million, but repayment depends on borrowers and project performance.
  • Management states it expects sufficient working capital for at least 12 months from the report’s issuance date, while also citing ongoing operating cash outflows and the new plant’s capital requirements.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No quantified revenue, profit, cash-flow or production guidance is provided. Management plans to expand overseas and offshore oilfield work, redeploy personnel to domestic maintenance, and develop recycling and other green-energy activities. It described oil-market conditions in the period as pressured by ample supply, weak demand and lower prices.
  • The Weifang recycling plant was substantially constructed by year-end, with RMB 86.4 million of construction in progress and an approximately $20 million project budget. Trial production and commissioning began September 28, 2026, after the reporting period. Planned annual capacity is 40,000 tons of waste plastics, producing about 30,000 tons of pyrolysis oil and 6,000 tons of carbon residue. Commercial yields, feedstock supply, certification, permits, customer acceptance and profitability remain uncertain.
  • Customer concentration increased: CNPC generated 65% of FY2026 revenue, up from 44%; Sinopec generated 12%, down from 17%. CNPC agreements may be terminated without advance notice. CNPC represented 46% of year-end net accounts receivable.
  • The company is exposed to VIE enforceability and PRC regulatory risks. It does not directly own the principal operating VIEs; contractual arrangements have not been tested in court. The company says subsequent U.S. offerings require CSRC filing and warns that noncompliance or adverse regulatory action could restrict operations, capital raising or dividends.
  • Gansu BHD’s hazardous-waste operating permit expired July 26, 2023 and had not been renewed as described. The filing says this may prevent resumption of hazardous-waste activities. It also identifies uncertainty around PRC-resident shareholders’ SAFE registration updates.
  • Controls are a significant concern: management found disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting ineffective at June 30, 2026. Disclosed material weaknesses include insufficient U.S. GAAP and SEC-reporting expertise, IT general controls, and inadequate control monitoring and self-testing. Remediation is planned for FY2027; the auditor did not attest to internal-control effectiveness.
  • Audited financial statements received an unqualified opinion. Enrome LLP identified recoverability of third-party loans as a critical audit matter. The filing reports no material litigation. An estimated RMB 8.25 million severance exposure was not accrued because actual payment, if any, could not be predicted.
  • After year-end, the company reported $8.73 million gross proceeds from ATM share sales through the report date. It also reported that it regained Nasdaq’s minimum-bid-price compliance on September 16, 2026. The 1-for-200 Class A reverse split was effective August 18, 2026; Class B shares were unaffected.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Borrower identities, repayment performance, collateral ownership and realizable value for the RMB 330.0 million loan portfolio—especially the RMB 262.0 million industrial-park exposure—and subsequent collections or further credit-loss allowances.
  • CNPC contract continuity, customer receivable collections, overseas-project margins and whether domestic maintenance revenue recovers.
  • Recycling-plant commissioning results, required operating approvals, actual capacity, product quality, ISCC certification, feedstock access, customer purchase commitments and remaining financing needs.
  • Status and consequences of the expired Gansu BHD permit, SAFE registration amendments, and any CSRC filings required for future offerings.
  • Progress on remediation of material control weaknesses and whether subsequent filings demonstrate improved U.S. GAAP reporting and IT controls.
  • Share dilution from the ATM and other offerings, post-split share counts, and the effect of the dual-class structure: Class B shares carry 15 votes each, with the two founders together holding all Class B shares and reported 99.28% of total voting power as a group.
  • Reconcile inconsistent currency descriptions in the filing: it variously describes the parent’s functional currency as U.S. dollars and the company’s functional or reporting currency as RMB. Verify the intended presentation and relevant exchange-rate exposures against the audited notes.