SHORE BANCSHARES INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2019

Shore Bancshares, Inc. — Q2 2019 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019. Shore Bancshares is a Maryland-based bank holding company operating Shore United Bank, principally in Maryland and nearby areas. Unless otherwise noted, amounts below are in millions of dollars.

Financial results and key metrics

MetricQ2 2019Q2 2018Six months 2019Six months 2018
Net interest income$12.3$12.6$24.7$25.0
Provision for credit losses$0.2$0.4$0.3$0.9
Continuing-operations income$4.2$4.2$8.1$7.7
Net income$4.2$4.4$8.0$8.4
Diluted EPS$0.33$0.34$0.62$0.66
  • Q2 tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.54%, down from 3.79% a year earlier and 3.61% in Q1 2019. Six-month margin was 3.57%, versus 3.80% in 2018.
  • Q2 interest income rose 7.9% year over year, led by loan growth, but interest expense increased 135.9%, principally from higher deposit rates. Q2 noninterest income rose 13.6%; noninterest expense rose 1.5%.
  • At June 30, total assets were $1,488.6; loans were $1,240.3, up $44.9 (3.8%) from year-end; deposits were $1,249.0, up $36.7 (3.0%). Stockholders’ equity was $191.3.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $39.3, versus $67.2 at December 31, 2018. First-half cash flow was $4.4 from operations, $(31.2) from investing and $(1.2) from financing, producing a $27.9 net cash decrease.
  • Short-term borrowings fell to $25.5 from $60.8; long-term borrowings remained $15.0. The long-term FHLB borrowing carries a 2.82% fixed rate and matures in April 2020. The Bank reported $212.9 of FHLB credit availability and $15.0 of federal funds lines.
  • The allowance for credit losses was $10.3, or 0.83% of loans. First-half net charge-offs were $0.3; Q2 net charge-offs were $0.3, primarily related to foreclosure-auction collateral sales.
  • At June 30, nonperforming assets were $15.6, down from $18.0 at year-end; accruing troubled debt restructurings were $7.8, down from $8.7. Nonaccrual loans were $14.6.
  • Shore United Bank was reported as well-capitalized: leverage ratio 10.29%, Tier 1 risk-based ratio 12.11%, and total risk-based capital ratio 12.98%.

Changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 net income declined modestly from $4.4 to $4.2, while income from continuing operations was nearly unchanged. Higher noninterest income and a lower credit-loss provision were largely offset by higher funding costs and expenses.
  • First-half net income fell from $8.4 to $8.0, partly reflecting discontinued operations: the company sold its insurance agency at the end of 2018 and discontinued its premium finance company. Continuing-operations income increased from $7.7 to $8.1.
  • Loan growth was funded in part by deposit growth and by reducing investment securities and short-term borrowings. Deposit interest expense increased substantially year over year.
  • Available-for-sale securities had a $3.8 unrealized gain in the first half, versus a $3.4 unrealized loss in the 2018 period; accumulated other comprehensive loss improved to $0.2 from $3.0 at year-end.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or financial guidance. Management said it expected liquidity to remain satisfactory and reported no known demands or uncertainties likely to materially impair liquidity.
  • Commercial real estate concentration is a major exposure: commercial real estate loans were 45.1% of loans. Non-owner-occupied commercial real estate, including construction, equaled 299.9% of risk-based capital; the portfolio including construction had grown 99.4% over three years. Management described heightened monitoring, underwriting and stress testing. Concentration could require higher capital or loan participations and could affect shareholder returns.
  • Management attributed the year-over-year margin pressure to higher deposit costs. Interest-rate fluctuations, local economic conditions, competition, regulation and credit quality remain key risks.
  • The company was preparing for CECL, the expected-credit-loss standard, which management anticipated would significantly affect its financial statements and credit-loss methodology. It was testing a vendor model and evaluating the impact; the filing does not provide a quantified estimate.
  • On July 19, 2019, the company established SERPs for three senior executives to replace long-term incentive plans whose RSUs were forfeited. The Bank also purchased $14 million of bank-owned life insurance to help fund future SERP contributions.
  • Lease accounting adoption in January 2019 resulted in recognition of $3.7 of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities at June 30. The filing reports no legal proceedings expected to have a material adverse impact and no material change in disclosed risk factors.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether deposit pricing and funding mix stabilize enough to support net interest margin as loans continue to grow.
  • Credit performance in the commercial real estate portfolio, including the large nonaccrual relationship and subsequent collateral recoveries or losses.
  • How the high commercial real estate concentration affects regulatory capital requirements and future lending or loan-sale decisions.
  • The eventual CECL adoption impact on the allowance, retained earnings and reported results.
  • The cost, funding and future obligations associated with the executive SERPs and the $14 million BOLI purchase.
  • Whether one-time Q2 fee income recurs; management characterized the increase as driven partly by one-time fees.