TSS, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

TSS, Inc. — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017. TSS provides data-center and mission-critical facility services, including facilities maintenance, systems integration, installation, and project management. All revenue was generated in the U.S. Amounts below are in millions except per-share data.

Financial results

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016Nine months 2017Nine months 2016
Revenue$4.898$5.416$13.485$20.120
Gross profit / margin$2.080 / 42%$1.461 / 27%$5.693 / 42%$4.934 / 24%
Operating income (loss)$0.393$0.240$0.766$(0.914)
Net income (loss)$0.298$0.165$0.527$(1.171)
Basic and diluted EPS$0.02$0.01$0.03$(0.07)
  • Q3 revenue declined 10% year over year, while gross profit increased about 42%; higher-margin revenue mix and lower operating expenses supported improved operating income.
  • Nine-month revenue declined 33%, mainly reflecting reduced facilities/project-management activity and business sales. Systems integration revenue grew 43% to $5.019 million for the nine months; facilities revenue fell 49% to $8.466 million.
  • SG&A fell 20% in Q3 and 23% for the nine months. The nine-month results included a $0.321 million gain on the January 2017 sale of a customer contract; no such gain was recorded in Q3.
  • Operating cash flow was negative $1.017 million for the nine months, versus positive $1.312 million in 2016. Cash decreased from $2.152 million at year-end 2016 to $0.970 million at September 30, 2017.
  • At September 30, current assets were $3.578 million and current liabilities $5.907 million, a working-capital deficit of $2.329 million and current ratio of approximately 0.61. Stockholders’ equity was negative $0.740 million.
  • Long-term borrowings had a $1.618 million principal balance, reported net of discount at $1.411 million. The company had no balance under its receivables-factoring agreement at quarter-end.

Material developments, outlook and risks

  • Management shifted toward facilities maintenance and systems integration, scaling back lower-margin design, procurement, and project-management work and outsourcing some functions. Management said this reduced overhead and working-capital volatility. Quarterly revenue was expected to remain below historical levels over the rest of 2017; no numeric forecast was provided.
  • In July, TSS borrowed $0.650 million from entities affiliated with its board chair and extended existing related-party debt to 2022. The notes bear 12% interest, half payable in cash and half in kind, are secured by substantially all assets, and carry warrants. The chair is affiliated with the lenders.
  • After quarter-end, TSS obtained an additional $0.400 million in loans from two new lenders, due in 2022, and issued warrants. These subsequent loans did not bear stated interest, but their warrant-related discounts will be amortized to interest expense.
  • The factoring facility is discretionary, not a committed credit line; advances are subject to RTS approval and fees based on prime plus 7%. TSS may need further financing or cost reductions if revenue, costs, or working-capital needs miss expectations.
  • The filing states that annual operating losses, a declining current ratio, and stockholders’ deficit raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management nevertheless concluded that it had adequate resources for the next 12 months, assuming its business plan and cash-flow projections are achieved. The financial statements include no adjustments for a failure to continue as a going concern.
  • A single U.S.-based IT OEM accounted for 65% of Q3 revenue and 63% of nine-month revenue, and 45% of receivables at September 30. Management also cited competition from larger companies and risks that fixed-price contract costs could exceed estimates.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material litigation known to it. The filing provided no specific earnings or margin guidance.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether operating cash flow and liquidity improve after the reduced project-management activity and the October financing.
  • Whether growth in systems integration and maintenance can offset lower facilities revenue while preserving the reported gross-margin improvement.
  • The terms, security, warrants, related-party implications, and cash-interest burden of the debt, including the October loans.
  • How dependent revenue and collections remain on the large IT OEM, and whether customer concentration changes.
  • Whether management’s going-concern assessment remains supportable if revenue or cash-flow projections are not met.