CALIX, INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2015

Calix, Inc. — Q1 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 28, 2015; comparison is with the three months ended March 29, 2014. Calix provides broadband access systems and software to communications service providers. Q1 2015 had one fewer day than the prior-year quarter.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ1 2015Q1 2014 / prior date
Revenue$91.0 million$85.8 million; up 6%
Gross profit / margin$42.5 million / 47%$36.9 million / 43%
Operating expenses$54.4 million$46.8 million
Operating loss$11.9 million$9.9 million
Net loss / diluted loss per share$11.9 million / $0.23$10.0 million / $0.20
Net cash used in operating activities$11.9 million$5.2 million
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities$97.8 million$111.7 million at December 31, 2014
Total liabilities / borrowings$82.8 million / none$97.6 million at December 31, 2014

Revenue growth reflected stronger bookings and shipments across territories and additional acceptance of stimulus-funded projects. Gross margin improved primarily on product and customer mix, higher revenue, and lower inventory write-downs ($1.0 million versus $1.3 million). Operating expenses rose, including R&D of $21.9 million, sales and marketing of $19.8 million, and G&A of $10.2 million. G&A included $1.9 million of Occam-litigation legal fees and expenses not reimbursable under existing D&O coverage.

Operating cash outflow increased year over year, with working-capital uses including higher receivables and lower accounts payable. Investing cash outflow was $7.3 million, including net purchases of marketable securities and $1.7 million of capital expenditures. The $50 million secured revolving credit facility was undrawn, with $50 million available; the company reported covenant compliance. Management said current cash, securities, and facility availability should cover anticipated needs for at least 12 months.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No specific revenue or earnings guidance was provided. Management expected operating expenses to rise in absolute dollars but decline as a percentage of revenue over time, and planned continued investment in R&D and sales and marketing.
  • Management said ARRA-funded projects were expected to reach completion by June 30, 2015, and related revenue was expected to decline in 2015. Government-funded project acceptance and deferred revenue recognition can make results uneven. Deferred revenue was $28.5 million at quarter-end.
  • Key risks include ongoing losses, quarterly variability, CSP spending cycles and customer concentration, competition, product development and margin pressures, and reliance on contract manufacturers and limited-source components. U.S. customers generated 89% of revenue; CenturyLink represented 19% of Q1 revenue, as disclosed in the risk factors.
  • Occam merger litigation remains pending. The company may have to indemnify former Occam officers and directors and Jefferies; future exposure cannot be quantified, and Jefferies-related indemnification may not be insured. Plaintiffs’ valuation expert estimated a $7.77–$9.65 per-share gap between Occam’s asserted fair value and merger consideration; defendants’ expert valued Occam below the consideration. The company was paying Jefferies’ fees and expected further payments.
  • After quarter-end, on April 26, the board authorized repurchases of up to $40 million of common stock. The authorization does not require purchases and may be changed or terminated.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether revenue growth and improved gross margin persist as stimulus-funded projects wind down, and whether inventory write-downs remain lower.
  • Cash burn, working-capital movements, and actual use or availability of the credit facility under its covenants.
  • Developments and potential costs in the Occam litigation, including insurance coverage and indemnification exposure.
  • Whether the authorized $40 million repurchase is executed and how it affects liquidity and share count.