HERSHEY CO quarterly report, Q2 FY2009

The Hershey Company — Q2 2009 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended July 5, 2009; comparisons are to the periods ended June 29, 2008. Financial statements are unaudited. Amounts below are in millions of dollars, except per-share data. Hershey cautions that results are seasonal and first-half performance may not indicate full-year results.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2009Q2 2008Six months 2009Six months 2008
Net sales$1,171.2$1,105.4$2,407.2$2,265.8
Gross profit / margin$453.3 / 38.7%$382.5 / 34.6%$893.5 / 37.1%$759.0 / 33.5%
EBIT / margin$116.7 / 10.0%$94.1 / 8.5%$269.6 / 11.2%$216.5 / 9.6%
Net income$71.3$41.5$147.2$104.7
Diluted EPS, common stock$0.31$0.18$0.64$0.46
Operating cash flowNot provided separatelyNot provided separately$446.2$320.1

Q2 sales rose 5.9% and first-half sales rose 6.2%. For the first six months, cash used in investing was $86.0 million, including $73.8 million of capital additions and capitalized software; cash used in financing was $368.5 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended the period at $28.8 million, down from $37.1 million at year-end 2008.

At July 5, 2009, current assets were $1,178.9 million and current liabilities were $1,001.9 million; the current ratio was 1.2:1, versus 1.1:1 at year-end. Debt comprised $245.4 million of short-term debt, $16.5 million current long-term debt, and $1,504.5 million long-term debt. The company reported a 79% debt capitalization ratio, down from 85%. Its revolving credit facility had a $1.1 billion limit, with an option for another $400 million subject to lender agreement; Hershey reported compliance with covenants.

Changes and management commentary

  • Profitability improved primarily on favorable pricing and higher gross margin. The margin benefit was partly offset by higher input and supply-chain costs, selling and administrative expenses, and business realignment charges.
  • Management attributed sales growth to price realization, partly offset by lower U.S. unit volumes from pricing elasticity. Foreign exchange reduced sales by approximately 2.1% in Q2 and 2.3% for the first half. Van Houten Singapore added $2.9 million of Q2 sales and $4.0 million for the first half.
  • Q2 consumer takeaway increased 28.8%, largely because of Easter timing; excluding seasonal sales, it increased 5.4%. Measured-channel market share increased 0.5 percentage points. First-half takeaway also rose 8.9%, with market share up 0.5 points.
  • Business realignment charges were $37.9 million in Q2 and $50.7 million for the first half. First-half net charges associated with the initiatives were $61.7 million, compared with $69.9 million in 2008. Q2 net income was reduced by $26.7 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, by these initiatives.
  • The Q2 effective tax rate fell to 24.1% from 41.2%, reflecting resolution of U.S. tax contingencies for 2004–2006. First-half tax rate was 34.0%; management expected approximately 36.0% for full-year 2009 excluding the effect of realignment charges. The lower quarterly rate materially contributed to reported earnings growth.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • For 2009, management expected net-sales growth within its 3%–5% long-term objective, driven mainly by pricing and brand-building, with foreign exchange a partial offset. Unit volumes were expected to decline because of pricing elasticity.
  • Management expected the 2009 commodity-cost basket to rise significantly versus 2008, but by less than its initial $175 million estimate. Pension expense was expected to increase by approximately $70 million. Advertising expense was forecast to rise 40%–45%.
  • Hershey expected 2009 diluted EPS growth excluding realignment charges, with adjusted growth slightly above its long-term 6%–8% objective. Full-year realignment and impairment charges were estimated at $85 million–$120 million, or $0.24–$0.33 per diluted share.
  • Total pre-tax charges and non-recurring implementation costs for the global supply-chain transformation were estimated at $640 million–$665 million, including expected pension settlement losses. Management cited possible additional pension contributions of $50 million–$100 million, including benefit payments, depending on pension-asset performance.
  • Key stated risks include raw-material and energy inflation, pricing-related volume declines, weaker demand or increased competition, product quality and recall exposure, international and currency volatility, pension costs, and the cost, timing, and savings of the supply-chain transformation. Commodity purchasing and hedges may also limit benefits from price declines.
  • A $15.1 million receivable related to damages from a 2006 Canadian product recall and temporary plant closure remained recorded; Hershey was in litigation with the ingredient supplier.
  • After the quarter, two directors resigned effective August 10, 2009, citing disagreement with transferring certain strategic and oversight responsibilities to a new Finance and Risk Management Committee. Replacement committee chairs were appointed.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of sales and margin growth reflects sustainable pricing and productivity versus temporary factors, including the lower tax rate and reduced realignment costs in particular expense lines.
  • Whether volume declines, higher commodity costs, pension expense, and planned advertising investment are consistent with the 2009 outlook and adjusted EPS target.
  • Progress and remaining cost exposure for the supply-chain transformation, including pension settlement charges and expected savings.
  • Liquidity and debt trends, including seasonal working-capital needs, short-term borrowing, and potential pension contributions.
  • Outcome and recoverability of the Canadian recall-related claim, and implications of the board resignations and revised governance structure.