National Bank Holdings Corp annual report, FY2016

National Bank Holdings Corporation — 2016 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016; comparisons are primarily with fiscal 2015. Amounts are U.S. dollars. The filing describes a regional community bank operating through NBH Bank, with 91 banking centers in Colorado, the greater Kansas City area and Texas.

Key financial results and position

Metric20162015Change / context
Total assets$4.57 billion$4.68 billionDown 2.4%
Loans$2.86 billion$2.59 billionUp 10.6%; originated loans grew 17.8%
Deposits$3.87 billion$3.84 billionUp 0.7%; transaction deposits were 69.7% of deposits
Shareholders’ equity$536.2 million$617.5 millionDown $81.4 million, reflecting substantial share repurchases
Net interest income$145.6 million$156.9 millionDown 7.2%; fully taxable equivalent (FTE) amount was $149.7 million, down 6.2%
Net interest margin3.39%3.54%FTE margin was 3.49%, versus 3.60%
Provision for loan losses$23.7 million$12.4 millionIncrease driven principally by energy-sector reserves
Non-interest income$40.0 million$21.4 million2015 included negative FDIC-related income; excluding specified FDIC and bargain-purchase items, 2016 increased $4.1 million, or 11.3%
Non-interest expense$136.0 million$158.0 millionDown 13.9%
Net income$23.1 million$4.9 millionDiluted EPS was $0.79 versus $0.14
Operating cash flow$(3.9) million$(37.6) millionCash and cash equivalents ended the year at $152.7 million

Profitability, credit and capital

  • Return on average assets was 0.50%, up from 0.10%; return on average equity was 3.95%, up from 0.70%. The non-GAAP return on average tangible common equity was 5.04%, versus 1.29%.
  • Net charge-offs were $21.6 million, or 0.80% of average loans; $19.1 million were energy-sector charge-offs. Excluding energy, non-310-30 net charge-offs were 0.10% of average loans, versus 0.12% in 2015.
  • Non-performing loans were $30.7 million, up from $25.6 million; non-performing assets were $46.4 million, down from $47.4 million. The allowance for loan losses was $29.2 million, or 1.02% of loans, compared with $27.1 million, or 1.05%.
  • Energy loans represented 3.2% of total loans. The company recorded $18.9 million of energy-sector provision expense and reported $12.6 million of non-accrual energy loans at year-end.
  • Consolidated regulatory capital ratios were 10.4% Tier 1 leverage, 14.2% common equity Tier 1 and Tier 1 risk-based capital, and 15.0% total risk-based capital. The Bank was above well-capitalized regulatory thresholds.

Material changes versus 2015

  • Loan growth and originations were strong: total loans rose 10.6%, and the company reported record 2016 originations of $1.04 billion. Meanwhile, the acquired, higher-yielding ASC 310-30 loan portfolio declined 28.1% to $145.9 million.
  • Runoff of higher-yielding acquired loans and investment securities, together with lower yields on new loans, reduced FTE net interest income by $9.9 million and narrowed FTE net interest margin by 11 basis points.
  • Provision expense rose $11.2 million, primarily reflecting energy-sector credit deterioration. Energy balances fell 38.5% year over year, partly through charge-offs and repayments.
  • Expenses declined $22.0 million. Management cited lower data-processing costs following the core system conversion, lower staffing and other expense reductions, and improved problem-asset workout costs.
  • Share repurchases totaled 4.50 million shares for $93.6 million, at a weighted-average price of $20.78. Dividends paid were $0.22 per share; the quarterly dividend increased to $0.07 during 2016.
  • The company’s loss-share agreements with the FDIC had ended in the fourth quarter of 2015; accordingly, FDIC-related income was zero in 2016, compared with negative $15.6 million in 2015.

Liquidity, funding and other notable items

  • On-balance-sheet liquidity, defined by the company as cash and unencumbered investment securities, was $995.8 million at year-end, down from $1.26 billion. Management attributed the decline largely to planned securities reductions used to support loan growth.
  • Funding included $3.87 billion of deposits, $92.0 million of repurchase agreements and $38.7 million of Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Reported FHLB advances and lines of credit available totaled $903.9 million, of which $38.7 million was used.
  • Time deposits of $788.8 million were scheduled to mature within 12 months. Total contractual cash obligations were $1.25 billion, primarily time deposits.
  • Net cash used in investing activities was $3.9 million? The cash-flow statement reports net cash used in operating activities of $3.9 million, $114.6 million provided by investing activities and $124.0 million used in financing activities. Net cash decreased $13.4 million.
  • The Bank distributed $140.0 million of capital to the holding company in February 2016, following regulatory approval. The company also received $15.4 million in Bank dividends during 2016.
  • Four banking-center sale agreements were expected to close in the second quarter of 2017; management estimated a $3.0 million gain. One additional Colorado banking center was to be consolidated in the first quarter of 2017.
  • Income tax expense was $2.9 million, reflecting a reported effective tax rate of 11.3%. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 generated a $2.1 million excess tax benefit. A $1.8 million building-sale gain also contributed to 2016 non-interest income.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

The filing gives no quantified earnings or financial guidance. Management emphasized continued organic loan and deposit growth, expense discipline, relationship banking, fee-income initiatives and selective acquisitions. It noted that replacing the higher yields from acquired loans as they run off depends on producing sufficient volumes of high-quality originated loans; the weighted-average rate on 2016 originations was 3.70% FTE.

  • Management described economic improvement and stronger real-estate fundamentals in its markets with guarded optimism. It warned that further weakness in property values or borrower credit quality could affect its real-estate-secured portfolio.
  • Prolonged low oil and gas prices could cause further stress in energy lending; the filing reports energy exposure, non-accrual relationships and substantial 2016 energy charge-offs and provisions.
  • Other principal risks include interest-rate and margin sensitivity, competition for loans and deposits, liquidity and deposit-retention risk, acquisition execution and integration, regulatory and compliance costs, cybersecurity and third-party technology dependence, and the subjectivity of acquired-loan cash-flow estimates and allowance assessments.
  • The company’s interest-rate model indicated asset sensitivity: an immediate, sustained 100-basis-point increase was estimated to raise projected net interest income 3.66%; a 50-basis-point decrease was estimated to reduce it 2.49%. Management cautioned that actual results may differ materially from model estimates.
  • Loan commitments totaled $602.2 million and standby letters of credit $13.5 million. Management did not anticipate material losses from these commitments. The company reported no litigation expected to have a material adverse effect.
  • KPMG issued unqualified opinions on the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; management also concluded disclosure controls and internal controls were effective at year-end.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether ongoing loan growth and new-loan yields can offset runoff of the acquired high-yield loan portfolio and the resulting pressure on net interest income and margin.
  • Subsequent credit performance in energy and other commercial lending, including charge-offs, criticized loans, non-accruals, provision expense and allowance adequacy.
  • Deposit retention and repricing as $788.8 million of time deposits mature within 12 months, and the availability and cost of contingent funding.
  • How much of 2016 earnings depended on nonrecurring or timing-sensitive items, including the stock-compensation tax benefit and building-sale gain.
  • Completion and realized economics of the planned banking-center sales, and the effects of capital distributions and continuing share repurchases on capital and per-share value.
  • Regulatory capital levels, interest-rate sensitivity assumptions, and the eventual impact of the expected credit-loss accounting standard.