O-I Glass, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

O-I Glass, Inc. (filed as Owens-Illinois, Inc.) — Q2 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Unaudited results cover the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with the corresponding 2013 periods. The company operates glass-container businesses across Europe, North America, South America and Asia Pacific.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2014Q2 2013Six months 2014Six months 2013
Net sales$1,797m$1,781m$3,436m$3,422m
Gross profit$358m$369m$679m$688m
Gross margin19.9%20.7%19.8%20.1%
Continuing earnings attributable to company$134m$135m$236m$214m
Net earnings attributable to company$114m$132m$215m$201m
Diluted EPS, continuing operations$0.80$0.81$1.42$1.29
Diluted EPS, net earnings$0.68$0.79$1.29$1.21
Segment operating profit$262m$267m$480m$493m

Q2 sales increased 1%, reflecting $25m of price benefit and $15m from currency, partly offset by a $24m volume impact; glass-container shipments declined 1%. Six-month sales rose $14m, as higher prices offset adverse currency and mix effects. Segment operating profit declined $5m in Q2 and $13m for the half, as higher costs outweighed pricing and shipment benefits.

  • Q2 regional segment profit: Europe $109m (down $2m); North America $83m (down $10m); South America $53m (up $16m); Asia Pacific $17m (down $9m). South American Q2 profit included $6m benefit from non-strategic asset sales.
  • Asia Pacific sales fell 20% in Q2 and 19% for the half, chiefly due to lower shipments following planned China plant closures and weaker Australian demand. North America faced higher supply-chain costs and elevated inventory; Europe benefited over the half from stronger volume and cost reductions.

Cash flow, debt and liquidity

  • For the first half, continuing operating cash flow was negative $31m, versus positive $22m a year earlier. Capital expenditures were $196m, versus $164m; reported free cash flow was negative $227m, versus negative $142m.
  • Working capital used $354m of cash, with North American inventory and supply-chain challenges contributing. Other net cash outflows were $82m, primarily related to returnable packaging and deferred customer contracts. Cash fell $189m during the half to $194m.
  • At June 30, cash was $194m and total debt was approximately $3.6bn, versus $249m and $3.8bn at June 30, 2013. The balance sheet reported $1.027bn of current loans and debt and $2.620bn of long-term debt. Current assets were $2.648bn and current liabilities $2.838bn.
  • The company had $727m of unused availability under its secured credit agreement. The 2015 exchangeable notes had a $611m balance, classified as current and due June 1, 2015; management said it intends to refinance them. Management expected operating cash flow and available credit to cover operating needs, seasonal working capital, debt service and other obligations.
  • Net interest expense was $108m for the half, down from $124m, reflecting lower debt and the absence of prior-year debt-repurchase and extinguishment charges.

Outlook, risks and notable items

  • Management expected the 2014 full-year effective tax rate to be comparable with 21.9% in 2013, excluding taxes on items it considered non-recurring. The first-half 2014 rate was 21.1%, including a $13m benefit from reductions in uncertain tax positions.
  • Q2 discontinued-operations loss was $20m; the first-half loss was $21m, including a settlement dispute with a purchaser of a previously disposed business and continuing costs related to the Venezuela expropriation.
  • Asbestos litigation remains a significant uncertainty: about 2,500 plaintiffs and claimants were pending at June 30. The company said ultimate asbestos liability cannot reasonably be estimated; first-half asbestos payments were $42m. It cited substantial future cash use and the potential for future charges.
  • A foreign non-income-tax assessment of approximately $90m, including penalties and interest, was being contested. The company had paid $70m in required installments and recorded the amount in other assets; it had not accrued the assessment, believing an appeal would likely succeed. An unfavorable outcome could result in forfeiture of the deposit, a charge of about $60m and a $30m non-income-tax refund.
  • The DOJ closed its inquiry into disclosed possible overseas FCPA matters in July 2013. The SEC’s investigation status and outcome remained uncertain; the company did not expect potential sanctions or remedial measures to materially affect its financial condition, results or liquidity.
  • Other stated risks include currency movements, refinancing and interest-rate conditions, demand and packaging preferences, input and transport costs, supply-chain disruption, cost-saving execution, and asbestos-related developments. The company reported no material change in risk factors or market-risk disclosures from its 2013 Form 10-K.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Progress and terms for refinancing the $611m exchangeable notes due June 2015, and continued access to the credit facility.
  • Whether operating cash flow improves as working capital and inventory normalize; first-half free cash flow was negative $227m.
  • Whether operating-cost inflation and supply-chain pressures continue to erode margins, especially in North America and Asia Pacific.
  • Developments in asbestos claims, future accruals and cash payments, given management’s inability to estimate ultimate liability.
  • Outcome of the foreign tax-assessment appeal and any SEC action concerning the overseas conduct investigation.
  • Effect of planned China plant closures and Australian demand on Asia Pacific volumes and profitability.