SM Energy Co quarterly report, Q2 FY2020

Business context and reporting period

SM Energy Company is an independent oil and gas producer focused on the Midland Basin and South Texas. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2020; comparisons are with the corresponding 2019 periods unless noted. The filing attributes sharply weaker market conditions to COVID-19 and the oil supply-demand imbalance.

Financial and operating results

MetricQ2 2020Six months 2020
Oil, gas and NGL production revenue$169.8 million, down 58%$524.0 million, down 30%
Net income (loss)$(89.3) million; $(0.79) per diluted share$(501.1) million; $(4.43) per diluted share
Operating cash flow$114.3 million$332.5 million, versus $378.4 million
Capital expendituresNot separately stated in the cited quarterly discussion$310.2 million, versus $576.1 million
Adjusted EBITDAX (non-GAAP)$201.5 million, versus $263.0 million$487.5 million, versus $449.5 million

Q2 average daily production was 122.9 MBOE, down 10%; first-half production was 129.4 MBOE per day, up 1%. Q2 production costs declined 27% to $7.20 per BOE. Realized prices before derivative settlements fell 60% for oil, 42% for gas and 36% for NGLs in Q2. Oil derivative settlements added $25.81 per barrel in Q2; the reported net derivative result was a $167.2 million loss, reflecting noncash mark-to-market movements as well as settlements.

For the six months, the company recorded $998.5 million of impairment expense, including $956.7 million on South Texas proved properties and related facilities, following lower commodity price forecasts. Q2 operating loss was $312.7 million. Interest expense was $40.4 million in Q2 and $81.9 million for the half year. A $227.3 million Q2 gain on debt extinguishment materially offset the quarterly loss; the half-year gain was $239.5 million.

Debt and liquidity

At June 30, cash was only $10,000. Current assets were $355.5 million and current liabilities $307.9 million. The company had $193.0 million outstanding on its revolving facility, $865.0 million of available borrowing capacity after letters of credit, and a $1.1 billion borrowing base and lender commitment, reduced from $1.2 billion at year-end 2019.

In June, SM Energy exchanged $718.9 million principal of existing notes for $446.7 million of 10.0% second-lien secured notes due 2025, paid $53.5 million cash in a private exchange and issued warrants covering up to approximately 5.9 million shares. Management reported a $218.7 million reduction in outstanding debt from the exchange transactions. Senior Notes, net, totaled $2.263 billion at quarter-end; revolving borrowings brought total reported debt to approximately $2.456 billion. The company was in compliance with debt covenants at June 30 and through the filing date.

Changes, outlook and risks

  • Management cut the 2020 capital program by approximately 25% from its initial $825–$850 million budget. It expected the program to be funded with operating cash flow, with revolver borrowings available for remaining needs.
  • Management expected full-year 2020 production to decline versus 2019, lower LOE per BOE and lower total G&A. It estimated average cost per well for the remainder of 2020 would be approximately 25% below year-end 2019 estimates. The filing does not provide a clear revised full-year capital budget amount or a numerical production target.
  • A majority of expected second-half 2020 oil production was hedged at NYMEX-equivalent prices of at least $55 per barrel. Management cautioned that the pandemic, future outbreaks, commodity prices and market recovery remained highly uncertain and could require further activity reductions or production curtailments.
  • Other material exposures include further property impairments, reduced borrowing capacity or more expensive financing following credit-rating downgrades, counterparty and infrastructure risks, and covenant or refinancing pressure. The NYSE minimum-price risk could also matter: a delisting could trigger a put right on $65.5 million of 2021 secured convertible notes.
  • Commitments included up to $9.0 million in drilling-rig early termination fees and potential liquidated damages of up to $39.5 million and $11.5 million under drilling/completion agreements; management expected to meet the activity requirements. A pending lawsuit’s trial was expected in Q4 2020, postponed because of the pandemic; management did not expect pending claims to have a material financial effect.

Investor verification points

  • Confirm the updated capital budget, production outlook and cash-flow assumptions as commodity markets evolve.
  • Track liquidity, borrowing-base redeterminations, covenant headroom, debt maturities and the cost of the 10.0% secured notes.
  • Separate derivative cash settlements from mark-to-market earnings effects, and assess hedge coverage, counterparties and future exposure.
  • Review the assumptions behind the South Texas impairment and whether additional impairments or lease-related charges arise.
  • Monitor common-stock listing compliance and the warrant terms, potential dilution and convertible-note put provisions.