Snap-On Inc annual report, FY2010

Snap-on Incorporated 10-K Summary

Period clarification: The supplied filing is Snap-on’s fiscal 2010 Form 10-K, for the year ended January 1, 2011, not a standalone 2009 Q4 filing. It includes comparative fourth-quarter 2009 results; the filing does not provide a Q4 2009 versus Q4 2008 results table. Unless stated otherwise, amounts below are in millions of dollars.

Business context and reporting period

Snap-on makes and sells professional tools, diagnostics and repair-information products, and equipment, and provides financing through its financial-services operations. Its reporting segments are Commercial & Industrial, Snap-on Tools, Repair Systems & Information, and Financial Services. In 2010, the company realigned segments; prior-year segment data was restated.

Fiscal 2010 comprised 52 weeks and ended January 1, 2011. Fiscal 2009 also comprised 52 weeks and ended January 2, 2010. The requested 2009 Q4 figures below are comparative data within this 10-K.

Financial performance and key metrics

MetricFiscal 2010Fiscal 2009Change
Net sales$2,619.2$2,362.5Up 10.9%
Gross profit / margin$1,211.1 / 46.2%$1,057.6 / 44.8%Margin up 140 bps
Operating earnings$331.4$250.7Up 32.2%
Net earnings attributable to Snap-on$186.5$134.2Up 39.0%
Diluted EPS$3.19$2.32Up 37.5%
Operating cash flow$140.4$347.1Down $206.7
Capital expenditures$51.1$64.4Down $13.3
Cash and cash equivalents at year end$572.2$699.4Down $127.2
Total debt at year end$1,170.8$1,066.8Up $104.0
Working capital at year end$884.4$936.2Down $51.8

Fiscal 2010 net sales excluding favorable currency translation increased 10.2%. Operating earnings benefited from higher sales, productivity and restructuring savings. Operating expenses rose to $894.1 from $824.4, but declined as a share of sales to 34.1% from 34.9%. Interest expense increased to $54.8 from $47.7.

Requested 2009 fourth-quarter comparative data

MetricQ4 2009Q4 2010 comparison
Net sales$618.1$696.9; up 12.7%
Gross profit / margin$284.4 / 46.0%$318.5 / 45.7%
Operating earnings$67.4$96.9; up 43.8%
Net earnings attributable to Snap-on$36.6$57.9
Diluted EPS$0.63$0.99
Financial-services revenue / operating earnings (loss)$6.7 / $(3.8)$21.5 / $9.4

The filing does not report Q4 2009 cash flow, debt, or liquidity measures separately; the annual amounts above should not be interpreted as Q4 figures.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Fiscal 2010 sales and earnings recovered from the 2009 downturn. All three operating groups grew sales: Commercial & Industrial rose 16.8%, Snap-on Tools 10.6%, and Repair Systems & Information 8.8%.
  • Commercial & Industrial operating earnings rose to $116.9 from $48.2; Repair Systems & Information rose to $164.4 from $122.1. Snap-on Tools earnings increased more modestly to $114.0 from $108.2, with margin declining to 11.0% from 11.5%.
  • Financial Services operating earnings declined to $14.4 from $17.5 for the full year, despite revenue increasing to $62.3 from $58.3. The year-over-year comparison reflects the change from selling most U.S. originated loans to CIT to holding new loans on Snap-on’s books and recognizing interest over their terms.
  • Operating cash flow fell substantially, mainly due to growth in receivables and inventory as demand increased, and a $48.0 discretionary domestic pension contribution.
  • Finance and contract receivables grew as SOC funded new originations: combined current and long-term balances increased $322.1 from year-end 2009.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management described 2010 as a period of business stabilization and planned continued investment in vehicle repair, critical industries, and emerging markets in 2011. It provided no specific 2011 sales or EPS guidance in the supplied text.
  • For 2011, Snap-on anticipated capital expenditures of $55 to $65, pension expense $11 higher year over year, and an effective tax rate of about 33%. It expected financial-services operating earnings to improve as SOC’s on-book portfolio grows.
  • Snap-on issued $250 of 4.25% notes in December 2010, receiving $247.7 net of transaction costs. A $200 tranche of 6.25% notes was due August 15, 2011. Total debt was $1,170.8 at year end. The company reported compliance with debt covenants and no borrowings under its $500 revolving credit facility.
  • Operating cash flow was below capital expenditures and dividends combined in 2010; the filing attributes the cash decline principally to receivables funding, working-capital investment, debt repayment, and pension funding. Management said available cash, operating cash flow, and credit arrangements were sufficient for anticipated needs.
  • A material arbitration dispute with CIT remained unresolved. Snap-on alleged approximately $115 in damages and had withheld $107.8 from CIT; CIT denied the claim and asserted claims exceeding $110, mostly seeking return of withheld amounts. Arbitration was scheduled for Q2 2011, and management could not determine the likely outcome. The retained amount remained in accrued liabilities.
  • Snap-on planned to close its Newmarket, Canada, tool-storage facility in mid-2011 and consolidate operations in Algona, Iowa. Fiscal 2010 exit and disposal costs were $14.2, versus $22.0 in 2009.
  • Other principal risks include economic weakness, franchisee performance, customer credit losses, access to financing, higher leverage and interest costs, pension assumptions and funding, foreign exchange, steel and energy costs, automotive-sector conditions, competition, execution of cost-reduction initiatives, litigation, regulation, and operational or technology disruptions.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the intended period: this is a fiscal 2010 10-K; Q4 2009 data is comparative, not the filing period.
  • Review the CIT arbitration outcome and the treatment of the $107.8 withheld balance.
  • Assess SOC portfolio growth, credit-loss provisions, delinquencies, and the capital required to fund new receivables.
  • Evaluate refinancing or repayment of the $200 notes due August 2011 and the effect of debt and interest costs on liquidity.
  • Check whether 2011 capital spending, pension expense, and restructuring expectations were realized, and whether sales and margin recovery persisted.
  • Distinguish earnings improvement from cash generation: 2010 net earnings increased while operating cash flow declined sharply.