UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2015. The company is a vertically integrated property-and-casualty insurer focused primarily on homeowners coverage, predominantly in Florida. Interim financial statements are unaudited and were reviewed, not audited.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2015Q2 2014Six months 2015Six months 2014
Total premiums earned and other revenues$123.6m$87.0m$227.4m$161.3m
Net premiums earned$112.9m$73.4m$207.2m$137.2m
Income before taxes$41.2m$30.4m$79.2m$53.5m
Net income$24.7m$17.1m$47.0m$30.7m
Diluted EPS$0.69$0.49$1.31$0.87
Net loss and LAE ratio35.2%37.7%35.4%39.7%
  • Q2 revenue rose 42.1% and net income rose 44.2%; six-month revenue rose 41.0% and net income rose 53.3%.
  • Cash from operations was $207.5m for the first half, versus $98.2m a year earlier. Cash and equivalents were $213.3m at June 30, up from $115.4m at year-end.
  • At June 30, total assets were $1,047.4m, stockholders’ equity $255.3m, and long-term debt $24.6m, down from $30.6m at year-end. Debt-to-equity was 9.6%, compared with 15.3% at year-end.
  • Investments totaled $504.0m, including $359.6m of fixed maturities, $38.5m of equity securities, $100.0m of short-term investments, and $5.8m of investment real estate.
  • Common dividends declared were $0.12 per share in each quarter. The company repurchased 200,000 common shares for approximately $5.1m during Q2.

Material changes and management commentary

  • UPCIC reduced its quota-share cession from 45% in the 2013–14 program to 30% in 2014–15, then eliminated quota-share reinsurance effective June 1, 2015. This increases premiums retained and expected profitability, but also increases retained losses and catastrophe exposure and eliminates related ceding commissions.
  • Management attributed premium growth to lower ceded premiums and increased policy count. Direct premiums written increased 13.6% in Q2 and 12.1% for the first half; net premiums written rose 68.6% and 62.4%, respectively, reflecting the reinsurance change as well as growth.
  • Management said claims-processing improvements and lower third-party adjusting costs helped reduce loss ratios. General and administrative expenses increased 47.6% in Q2 and 40.6% for the first half, largely due to higher net deferred acquisition-cost amortization following changes to quota-share ceding and increased stock compensation and performance bonuses.
  • Florida rate changes approved in April were expected to raise average homeowners rates about 2.2% statewide and dwelling-fire rates about 4.9%, with phased effective dates in 2015. Policy count was 592,278 at June 30; 89.9% were in Florida. Management reported other-state policy growth of 21.4% since year-end 2014.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • Management expects operating cash flows to meet working-capital needs for at least the next 12 months. No earnings or revenue guidance was provided.
  • Management described the 2015–16 reinsurance terms as more favorable, but cautioned that results may not improve. UPCIC’s catastrophe program provides coverage up to $2.054bn, with a $35m pre-tax retention for each of the first three catastrophic events; estimated UPCIC catastrophe and FHCF costs were $261.6m. The company remains liable for insured losses if reinsurers fail to pay.
  • Catastrophe frequency and severity, reserve adequacy, reinsurance availability and counterparty credit, Florida concentration, regulatory restrictions, investment-market movements, and debt covenants are key risks. Florida represented 89.9% of policies and 86.4% of insured value.
  • Insurers met stated Florida statutory capital requirements; UPCIC had $213.0m and APPCIC $14.2m of statutory capital and surplus at June 30. No subsidiary dividends were paid to the parent in the first half; insurer dividends are subject to regulatory limits.
  • Routine claims-related lawsuits were not considered material by management. An IRS examination was underway concerning a 2009 tax-year loss carryback. Management reported no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors and no material subsequent events requiring disclosure.

Investor facts to verify

  • How much of the earnings and written-premium growth reflects underlying policy and rate growth versus reduced ceded reinsurance, and how will the fully retained quota-share risk affect future loss volatility?
  • Review the 2015–16 catastrophe program’s attachment points, limits, reinstatement terms, total cost, and reinsurer credit quality against the company’s Florida exposure.
  • Assess reserve development and claims trends, particularly given the increase in retained losses and the estimated nature and timing of unpaid claims.
  • Reconcile the filing’s differing descriptions of operating footprint: the notes refer to homeowners coverage in ten states, while MD&A says the company was licensed in thirteen states.
  • Monitor cash-flow quality: first-half operating cash flow benefited materially from movements in reinsurance balances, prepaid reinsurance, and unearned premiums.