VALERO ENERGY CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

Valero Energy Corporation — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012. Unless noted, amounts are in millions of dollars. Valero operates refining, retail, and ethanol businesses.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ3 2012Q3 2011Nine months 2012Nine months 2011
Revenue$34,726$33,713$104,555$91,314
Operating income$1,309$1,979$2,426$3,513
Net income attributable to Valero shareholders$674$1,203$1,073$2,045
Diluted earnings per share$1.21$2.11$1.93$3.59
Cash from operating activities——$5,107$4,328

Revenue rose year over year, primarily reflecting higher refined-product prices and, for the nine-month comparison, increased throughput and the inclusion of the Meraux and Pembroke refineries. Earnings declined despite higher revenue. Nine-month operating cash flow benefited in part from a $511 million favorable working-capital change versus the prior period.

At September 30, cash and temporary investments were $2,549, up from $1,024 at year-end 2011. Current assets were $16,267 and current liabilities $12,251. Debt and capital lease obligations totaled $7,048, including $585 current; debt excluding capital leases was reported at $6,997. The company had no borrowings outstanding under its $3 billion revolving facility, with $64 million of letters of credit outstanding. The accounts-receivable sales facility had $100 million outstanding at quarter-end.

For the first nine months, capital expenditures were $2,129 and turnaround and catalyst costs were $339. Financing cash outflows included $263 of dividends and $148 of treasury-stock purchases. The quarterly dividend was $0.175 per share, versus $0.05 a year earlier.

Operating results and changes

  • Refining: Q3 operating income was $1,528 versus $1,947; nine-month income was $2,773 versus $3,476. Q3 throughput margin was $13.12 per barrel versus $13.24; nine-month margin was $10.51 versus $11.65. For Q3, stronger North Atlantic and Mid-Continent results were offset by weaker Gulf Coast and West Coast results. Nine-month results also reflected higher operating costs at the recently acquired Meraux and Pembroke refineries.
  • Retail: Q3 operating income fell to $41 from $97; nine-month income was $253 versus $298. Management attributed the weakness principally to lower fuel margins, including the effect of rising wholesale prices.
  • Ethanol: Q3 recorded an operating loss of $73, versus income of $107; nine-month loss was $59, versus income of $215. Lower margins reflected high corn prices, weaker ethanol prices, excess supply, reduced U.S. gasoline demand, and increased Brazilian imports.
  • Special items: Q3 included $345 of impairments, primarily $333 related to Aruba, and $41 of Aruba severance expense. Nine-month impairments were $956, including $928 related to Aruba, plus the $41 severance expense. The 2011 nine-month comparison included a $542 loss on commodity derivatives, which partly complicates year-over-year comparisons.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Valero expected 2012 capital investments of approximately $3.0 billion, including about $150 million for environmental projects, plus $495 million for turnaround and catalyst costs.
  • Management said ethanol margins had begun to recover in early Q4 but remained unfavorable, and expected energy markets and margins to remain volatile. Management cautioned that completion of crude-oil pipeline and logistics projects could narrow the WTI discount and reduce margins for refiners processing WTI-priced crude.
  • In September, Valero decided to reorganize the suspended Aruba refinery into a crude-oil and refined-products terminal after a prospective buyer withdrew its nonbinding offer. The company recorded a further impairment and severance liability for 495 employees. It said refining assets would be maintained for possible restart; future abandonment could trigger a land-lease retirement obligation.
  • Valero was reviewing potential transactions to separate its retail business, including a possible tax-efficient distribution to shareholders; no transaction was finalized in the filing.
  • Environmental and regulatory risks include potential costs and operating restrictions from greenhouse-gas rules, California’s AB 32 programs, and uncertainty around Texas permitting. The company said it could not determine the costs or effects of certain permitting developments.
  • IRS audits covered U.S. federal tax years 2002–2009. Valero was contesting certain assertions; an adverse outcome could reclassify deferred tax liabilities as current and materially affect liquidity. Other disclosed litigation loss-contingency liabilities were not material, according to the company.
  • Senior unsecured ratings were investment grade at filing, with S&P BBB (negative outlook), Moody’s Baa2 (stable), and Fitch BBB (stable). The company warned that downgrades could raise financing costs or impair access to financing.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether Aruba remains a terminal operation or Valero later restarts or abandons the refinery assets, and whether further charges or obligations arise.
  • Whether refining margins—particularly WTI-related feedstock advantages—and ethanol margins improve or weaken, and how acquired-refinery costs affect profitability.
  • Progress, structure, timing, and financial consequences of the proposed retail-business separation.
  • Actual 2012 capital investment and turnaround spending compared with management’s estimates, alongside cash generation and debt levels.
  • Developments in IRS audits, environmental regulation and permitting, and any resulting cash, compliance, or operating impacts.