ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. quarterly report, Q1 FY2015

Entergy Texas, Inc. — Q1 2015 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

Entergy Texas is a regulated electric utility serving customers in Texas. This summary focuses on its consolidated results for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared with the same 2014 period; balance-sheet amounts are as of March 31, 2015, compared with December 31, 2014. The filing is unaudited and cautions that quarterly results are seasonal and should not be used as a full-year forecast.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ1 2015Q1 2014 / comparison
Operating revenue$411.2 million$440.3 million; down 6.6%
Net revenue$143.7 million$135.3 million; up $8.4 million
Operating income$44.0 million$43.1 million
Net income$16.6 million$13.2 million; up $3.4 million
Operating margin10.7%9.8% (calculated from reported revenue and operating income)
Net cash from operating activities$66.3 million$(1.3) million
Capital expenditures$66.4 million$34.7 million
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter-end$15.5 million$30.4 million at Dec. 31, 2014; $1.9 million at Mar. 31, 2014
Total assets$3.85 billion$3.91 billion at Dec. 31, 2014
Debt to capital61.6%; 50.1% excluding non-recourse securitization bonds62.4%; 50.6% excluding securitization bonds at Dec. 31, 2014

Long-term debt was $1.256 billion, including $542.9 million of securitization bonds; a further $200 million of long-term debt was classified as currently maturing. Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds, was 49.7%. Entergy Texas had a $150 million credit facility, with no cash borrowings and $1.3 million of letters of credit outstanding; separate MISO-related letters of credit totaled $11 million.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Revenue declined mainly as lower sales for resale and lower retail revenue outweighed rate and fuel-recovery increases. Billed electric sales fell 1% overall; retail sales declined 4%, including residential usage down 5% and industrial usage down 7%.
  • Net revenue increased on the $18.5 million annual base-rate increase effective April 2014, higher wholesale capacity revenue, fuel-recovery changes, and higher unbilled sales volume. These gains were partly offset by increased purchased-power capacity costs and lower rent from electric property.
  • Net income improved despite lower revenue, supported by higher net revenue and lower interest expense. Higher operation and maintenance and other taxes partly offset the improvement. The effective income tax rate was 33.3%, versus 39.2% in Q1 2014.
  • Operating cash flow improved substantially, primarily reflecting fuel-cost recovery and the timing of customer collections. Investing cash use increased with greater transmission and fossil-generation construction work; financing cash use was broadly similar to the prior-year quarter.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • No specific Entergy Texas earnings or financial guidance is provided in the supplied filing text. Management notes that seasonal quarterly results are not a reliable basis for estimating full-year results.
  • Entergy Texas is part of a proposed acquisition of Union Power Station with Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, targeted to close in late 2015 subject to regulatory, antitrust, and other approvals, including cost recovery. Texas intervenors questioned the facility’s need, economics, and transmission effects; PUCT staff said the company had not adequately supported need, alternatives analysis, or facility valuation. Entergy Texas planned to seek cost recovery in a second-quarter 2015 rate application.
  • Key exposures include regulatory decisions on rates and fuel recovery, MISO market and transmission costs, fuel and purchased-power prices, generation availability, weather, environmental requirements, and execution of capital projects. The filing states there were no material changes to the risk factors in the 2014 Form 10-K.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the improvement in net income and operating cash flow persists after the timing effects of fuel recovery and customer collections.
  • Final PUCT, FERC, antitrust, and other decisions on Union Power Station, including the purchase price, cost recovery, and any acquisition adjustment.
  • The refinancing or repayment plan for the $200 million of currently maturing long-term debt and continued availability of credit facilities.
  • Future retail demand, especially residential and industrial sales, and the effect of purchased-power costs and MISO charges on margins.