ENTERGY CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

Entergy Corporation — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period. Entergy operates regulated electric and gas utilities in the south-central United States and the Entergy Wholesale Commodities (EWC) business, principally merchant nuclear generation. This combined filing covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014; financial figures below are consolidated Entergy Corporation results unless noted. The filing also includes separate reports for utility subsidiaries.

Key financial results

MetricQ3 2014Q3 2013Nine months 2014Nine months 2013
Operating revenue$3.458 billion$3.352 billion$9.664 billion$8.699 billion
Operating income$492.9 million$388.9 million$1.687 billion$1.129 billion
Consolidated net income$234.9 million$244.2 million$835.3 million$579.2 million
Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation$230.0 million$239.9 million$820.6 million$565.0 million
Diluted EPS$1.27$1.34$4.56$3.16
Dividends declared per common share$0.83$0.83$2.49$2.49
  • Q3 revenue rose about 3%, but net income attributable to Entergy fell about 4%; reported diluted EPS declined from $1.34 to $1.27. Nine-month revenue increased about 11%, and attributable net income rose about 45%, with diluted EPS up from $3.16 to $4.56.
  • Q3 Utility net income was $315.3 million versus $352.3 million a year earlier; EWC reported a $32.7 million loss versus a $92.8 million loss. For nine months, Utility net income was $732.8 million versus $680.7 million, while EWC net income was $236.3 million versus $0.8 million.
  • Operating margin was approximately 14.3% in Q3 2014 versus 11.6% in Q3 2013, and 17.5% for the first nine months versus 13.0%. These are calculated from reported operating income and revenue.
  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $2.891 billion, compared with $2.199 billion. Investing cash outflow was $2.168 billion and financing cash outflow was $394 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended the period at $1.069 billion, up from $739 million at year-end 2013.
  • At September 30, Entergy reported $11.635 billion of long-term debt, $1.114 billion of currently maturing long-term debt, and $891 million of notes payable and commercial paper. Debt-to-capital was 56.7% (55.2% excluding specified non-recourse securitization bonds); net debt-to-net capital excluding those bonds was 53.0%, down from 54.8% at year-end 2013.
  • Entergy’s $3.5 billion credit facility had $3.247 billion available after $245 million of borrowings and $8 million of letters of credit. Commercial paper outstanding was $776 million. Entergy stated it was in compliance with the facility’s 65% debt-ratio covenant.

Material changes and notable items

  • Q3 results included $102.9 million pretax ($66.9 million after tax) of Vermont Yankee-related charges, primarily associated with an updated decommissioning study, and a $60.9 million pretax ($40.5 million after tax) write-off of Entergy Mississippi regulatory assets for new nuclear development costs. The comparable 2013 quarter included $291.5 million pretax ($183.7 million after tax) of Vermont Yankee impairment and related charges.
  • For the first nine months, EWC net revenue increased $333 million to $1.703 billion, principally due to higher realized wholesale energy and capacity prices and fewer unplanned outage days. Utility net revenue increased $179 million to $4.401 billion, reflecting rate changes and higher billed usage, partly offset by less favorable Q3 weather.
  • Reported nine-month cash from operations included $310 million received through Louisiana Act 55 storm-cost financing. The related bonds are obligations of the Louisiana public authority and are described as non-recourse to Entergy and the participating utilities.
  • Entergy’s debt-to-capital ratio improved from 57.9% at year-end 2013, primarily because retained earnings increased. Pension contributions were $320 million through September; management expected total 2014 qualified-plan contributions of $399 million.

Outlook, commentary, risks, and contingencies

  • Entergy was developing its 2015–2017 capital plan and preliminarily anticipated $7.8 billion of Utility investment and $0.9 billion for EWC. These estimates remain subject to revision. The Ninemile 6 gas project was expected to enter service by year-end 2014.
  • The Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share in October 2014, unchanged from the quarterly rate paid since Q2 2010. The filing provides no clear consolidated full-year earnings or EPS guidance; management cautions that interim results are seasonal and should not be used alone to estimate full-year results.
  • Vermont Yankee was expected to stop generating in Q4 2014. Updated decommissioning cost and cash-flow timing assumptions increased the recorded decommissioning liability and contributed to impairment charges. Execution, final decommissioning costs, and shutdown timing remain important uncertainties.
  • At Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), the NRC had classified two findings as “yellow with substantial safety significance.” A further preliminary yellow finding related to flood-barrier effectiveness was under NRC review. If finalized as yellow, the plant could face substantially increased NRC oversight.
  • Entergy Louisiana faced a prudence review of its Waterford 3 steam-generator replacement project. Regulators’ staff identified potential disallowances of up to $71 million, and an intervenor sought $141 million of project-cost disallowances; Entergy disputed the proposed disallowances. An evidentiary hearing was scheduled for December 2014.
  • Other material uncertainties include rate-case and fuel-cost recovery outcomes; MISO market rules and transmission costs; pending System Agreement cost-allocation and termination proceedings; nuclear license renewal and environmental permitting; power and fuel prices, hedging and collateral needs; storms and restoration-cost recovery; and pension, decommissioning, and environmental compliance costs.
  • For EWC, a $10/MWh change in market energy prices was estimated to affect pretax income by approximately +$61 million or -$55 million for the remainder of 2014, based on September 30 market conditions and planned generation and hedges. A credit downgrade below investment grade could have required approximately $136 million of additional cash or letters of credit under certain agreements.
  • Entergy reported no material change in the Form 10-K risk factors and stated that disclosure controls were effective, with no material quarter change in internal control over financial reporting.

Investor facts to verify

  • Reconcile the quarter’s lower net income and EPS with the Vermont Yankee and Mississippi write-offs, the effective tax rate, and underlying segment performance.
  • Track Vermont Yankee shutdown and decommissioning assumptions, including future cost-study updates and cash-flow timing.
  • Confirm the final NRC assessment and required corrective actions at ANO, including potential effects on operations and oversight.
  • Monitor Waterford 3 cost-recovery proceedings and the resolution of major rate, fuel-recovery, and System Agreement matters.
  • Assess whether reported operating cash flow, available credit capacity, debt maturities, capital spending, pension funding, and EWC collateral exposure remain adequate as market and regulatory conditions change.