HANMI FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

Hanmi Financial Corporation — Q3 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. Hanmi Financial is a bank holding company whose primary subsidiary, Hanmi Bank, operates mainly in Southern California. Unless stated otherwise, dollar figures below are in millions.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ3 2012Q3 2011Nine months 2012Nine months 2011
Interest and dividend income$29.4$31.7$89.7$98.2
Net interest income before credit provision$24.9$25.2$74.6$76.7
Provision for credit losses$0$8.1$6.0$8.1
Noninterest income$6.5$6.0$17.3$17.5
Noninterest expense$18.8$18.9$57.3$62.8
Net income$13.3$4.2$76.4$22.6
Diluted EPS$0.42$0.22$2.42$1.20
  • Margins and returns: Q3 net interest margin was 3.69%, versus 3.75%; nine-month margin was 3.74%, versus 3.69%. Q3 return on average assets/equity was 1.87%/14.97%; nine-month figures were 3.69%/32.52%.
  • Balance sheet at September 30: Assets were $2.84 billion; net loans $1.89 billion; deposits $2.36 billion; stockholders’ equity $364.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents were $302.4 million.
  • Credit quality: Gross loans were $1.96 billion, up 1.0% from year-end 2011. Nonperforming loans declined 14.7% to $44.7 million; nonperforming assets were $45.1 million, or 1.59% of assets. Delinquent loans of 30 days or more fell to $20.2 million from $35.2 million. The allowance for loan losses was $66.1 million, 3.38% of gross loans and 147.92% of nonperforming loans. Nine-month net charge-offs were $30.6 million, down from $53.6 million.
  • Cash flows, nine months: Operating cash flow was $38.2 million, investing cash flow provided $44.4 million, and financing activities provided $18.2 million. Cash and cash equivalents increased $100.7 million to $302.4 million.
  • Debt and capital: FHLB advances were $3.0 million; junior subordinated debentures were $82.4 million. Hanmi Bank’s total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios were 19.91%, 18.63%, and 14.05%, respectively; each exceeded the stated “well-capitalized” thresholds.

Changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 net income rose to $13.3 million from $4.2 million, despite lower interest income and slightly lower net interest income. The absence of a credit-loss provision, compared with $8.1 million in Q3 2011, was a significant factor.
  • Nine-month net income increased to $76.4 million from $22.6 million. This result includes a $47.7 million income-tax benefit, primarily associated with reversing $57.9 million of deferred-tax valuation allowance. The improvement therefore should not be read as solely recurring operating growth.
  • Loan interest income fell as average loans and loan yields declined. Lower deposit costs partly offset this pressure: nine-month interest expense fell to $15.0 million from $21.4 million.
  • Noninterest income was broadly flat for nine months. Higher gains on SBA loan sales were substantially offset by increased losses on sales of other loans, which management linked to reducing problem assets.
  • Noninterest expense declined 8.7% for nine months, partly reflecting lower deposit insurance and regulatory assessments, OREO expense, and the absence of $2.2 million in prior-year expenses related to an unconsummated capital offering. Salaries and benefits increased 6.4%.
  • Core deposits increased 13.5% to $1.73 billion from year-end, while deposits of $100,000 or more declined 22.7%. Total deposits increased 0.8%.

Outlook, commentary, risks, and unusual items

  • Management priorities: Strengthen capital, continue improving credit quality, comply with the Federal Reserve Written Agreement, develop products and services, and generate quality loans to improve profitability. The filing gives no quantified earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Regulatory matters: The California DFI terminated its MOU with the Bank on October 29, 2012, after the quarter-end. The separate Federal Reserve Written Agreement remained in effect at the filing date; management said the company and Bank had complied with substantially all requirements. The agreement restricts dividends and interest payments on the junior debentures without prior approval.
  • Liquidity and distributions: Management believed the parent had adequate standalone liquidity through December 31, 2012. The Bank reported $314.5 million of remaining FHLB borrowing capacity and $56.1 million available through the Fed Discount Window, with no brokered deposits. Common dividends had been suspended since 2008. Accrued interest on junior debentures was $12.2 million; management intended to pay arrears if the Written Agreement were terminated.
  • Investment and tax items: The company reclassified all held-to-maturity securities to available for sale during Q3, citing concern about rising municipal-market default risk; the reclassified securities had $52.6 million fair value and $50.6 million amortized cost at September 30. It recorded $0.3 million of nine-month impairment losses on an equity security. An ownership change may limit use of tax-loss carryforwards; management estimated $5.3 million of California deferred-tax assets would be effectively eliminated.
  • Credit and market risks: Lending is concentrated in Southern California and commercial real estate/commercial and industrial loans. Three industry concentrations exceeded 10% of gross loans: lessors of non-residential buildings (18.36%), accommodation/hospitality (15.41%), and gasoline stations (13.83%). Management also cited low loan yields, competition, potential deposit and liquidity constraints, collateral-value uncertainty, interest-rate exposure, and possible securities impairment.
  • Restructurings and leadership: The company restructured 50 loans with $12.9 million net carrying value during the first nine months; total TDRs were $38.0 million. CFO Lonny D. Robinson resigned effective November 13, 2012, and Mark Yoon was appointed interim CFO. The filing states the resignation did not arise from disagreement.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much future earnings depend on deferred-tax valuation-allowance reversals, and the realizability and Section 382 limitations of remaining tax assets.
  • Whether credit improvement and lower charge-offs persist, and whether the $66.1 million loan-loss allowance remains adequate as TDRs and impaired loans perform.
  • The status and terms of the Federal Reserve Written Agreement, including any remaining restrictions on dividends and junior-debenture interest payments.
  • Whether loan growth and recurring fee income can offset loan-yield pressure and reliance on SBA loan-sale gains and problem-asset dispositions.
  • Exposure within the stated industry and real-estate concentrations, and the valuation, credit quality, and liquidity implications of the municipal securities portfolio and its reclassification.
  • The effects of the CFO transition and the company’s stated standalone liquidity outlook; the filing provides no quantified forward earnings guidance.