LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

Landstar System, Inc. — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2014; comparable periods ended September 28, 2013. Unaudited interim results. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Business context and results

Landstar is an asset-light transportation and logistics provider using independent sales agents and third-party capacity providers. It reports Transportation Logistics and Insurance segments. The company sold Landstar Supply Chain Solutions (LSCS) on December 28, 2013; prior-year results were reclassified as discontinued operations, so continuing-operations comparisons are more informative.

MetricQ3 2014Q3 201339 weeks 201439 weeks 2013
Revenue$819.3$675.5$2,322.0$1,972.8
Operating income$59.6$46.6$163.2$136.8
Income from continuing operations$36.8$28.5$100.3$83.7
Net income$36.8$29.2$100.3$86.5
Diluted EPS$0.82$0.64$2.22$1.87

Financial condition and cash flow

  • Q3 revenue grew 21%; loads increased approximately 11% and revenue per load approximately 10%. For the first 39 weeks, revenue rose 18%, reflecting about 8% more loads and 10% higher revenue per load. Management attributed truck growth to stronger demand, tight capacity and market-share gains from new agents.
  • Gross profit margin was 14.8% in Q3 versus 15.4% a year earlier, and 15.0% for the 39 weeks versus 15.4%. Purchased transportation rose to 77.3% of Q3 revenue from 76.7%, as truck capacity tightened and a greater share of business used brokerage carriers. Conventional operating margin (operating income/revenue) was approximately 7.3% in Q3 versus 6.9%.
  • Q3 operating income rose 28% and net income rose 26%. For 39 weeks, income from continuing operations increased about 20%; 2013 net income also included $2.7 million of discontinued-operation income.
  • Operating cash flow was $72.6 million for 39 weeks, down from $125.3 million. Management primarily attributed the decline to higher receivables amid revenue growth; cash flow also reflected a $64.0 million decrease in insurance claims liabilities, versus a $26.6 million increase in the prior-year period.
  • At September 27, cash and cash equivalents were $140.6 million and short-term investments $37.7 million. Working capital was $320.1 million and the current ratio 1.9:1. Total debt, including current maturities, was $115.1 million; there were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility and $192.0 million remained available. The company reported compliance with its debt covenants.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $495.7 million. The company repurchased $56.4 million of stock during the 39 weeks and paid $24.5 million in dividends, including payment of a prior-year declared dividend. It had authorization to repurchase 1,827,782 additional shares at quarter-end.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No specific revenue or earnings guidance is provided. Management expected approximately $9 million of operating-property purchases during the remainder of fiscal 2014 and believed operating cash flow and available borrowing capacity would fund debt service, growth, dividends, buybacks and working capital needs.
  • Management identified dependence on demand, independent agents and third-party capacity, as well as tight truck capacity and purchased-transportation costs, as important business considerations. Other disclosed risks include accidents and claims, customer collection or bankruptcy risk, competition, technology disruptions, regulation and key-vendor dependence.
  • Unfavorable development of prior-year self-insured claims reduced 39-week operating income by $7.1 million and continuing-operations diluted EPS by $0.10 (prior year: $8.2 million and $0.11). Q3 impact was $0.4 million and $0.01 per diluted share, compared with $3.6 million and $0.05 a year earlier. Claims estimates remain sensitive to future developments.
  • The 2007 accident litigation was settled: the settlement was paid in full and plaintiffs released the Landstar defendants. Landstar stated its $5 million self-insured retention had been charged in 2007 and excess amounts were covered by insurance/reinsurance; future insurance-premium effects were uncertain. Other claims and litigation could materially affect results in a particular period, though management did not expect a material adverse effect on financial condition after provisions.
  • The company said the new revenue-recognition standard was not expected to have a material impact. Disclosure controls were judged effective, with no significant quarterly change in internal control over financial reporting.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the strong load and revenue-per-load growth persists and whether capacity costs continue to pressure gross profit margin.
  • Receivables, collections and operating cash flow conversion as revenue expands.
  • Insurance-claim reserve development, claim severity and potential effects on insurance costs and premiums.
  • Capital-lease obligations and total debt trajectory alongside buybacks, dividends and the remaining credit capacity.
  • Comparability of reported earnings, particularly the prior-year discontinued LSCS results and the claim-development effects.