NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Business Context and Reporting Period

National Bankshares, Inc. is a Virginia financial holding company whose principal subsidiary, The National Bank of Blacksburg, operates as a community bank through 25 offices in southwest Virginia. The company provides retail and commercial banking, lending, trust, investment, insurance, and related services. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, with comparisons to September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2012.

Key Financial Metrics

MetricThree Months Ended September 30Nine Months Ended September 30
Net income$4.517 million vs. $4.293 million$13.168 million vs. $13.062 million
Basic diluted EPS$0.65 vs. $0.62$1.90 / $1.89 vs. $1.88
Net interest income$10.177 million vs. $10.301 million$30.107 million vs. $30.462 million
Provision for loan losses$0.303 million vs. $0.778 million$1.329 million vs. $2.554 million
Noninterest income$2.109 million vs. $2.108 million$6.405 million vs. $6.543 million
Noninterest expense$6.123 million vs. $6.088 million$18.184 million vs. $17.530 million
Income before taxes$5.860 million vs. $5.543 million$16.999 million vs. $16.921 million

Quarterly net income increased 5.2%, while nine-month net income increased 0.8%. The implied quarterly net margin was approximately 39.1% in 2013 versus 35.1% in 2012; the nine-month implied net margin was approximately 37.9% versus 35.8%, based on net income divided by interest income plus noninterest income. The company reported annualized return on average assets of 1.61% and return on average equity of 11.70% for the nine months, compared with 1.64% and 12.01%, respectively, for 2012. Net interest margin was 4.27%, down from 4.38% for 2012 and 4.40% for the comparable 2012 nine-month period.

Balance Sheet, Capital, and Liquidity

  • Total assets were $1.077 billion, down 2.44% from December 31, 2012.
  • Loans, net of unearned income and before the allowance, were $590.664 million, down 0.25% from year-end. Net loans after the allowance were $582.574 million.
  • Total deposits were $923.498 million, down 2.46%; time deposits declined 10.50%, reflecting customer migration away from low-rate certificates of deposit.
  • Securities totaled $356.977 million at amortized cost, including $192.225 million of available-for-sale securities and $164.752 million of held-to-maturity securities.
  • Stockholders’ equity was $146.294 million, down 2.54% from year-end, primarily because accumulated other comprehensive loss increased to $15.969 million, reflecting after-tax unrealized securities losses of $13.231 million.
  • The company had no long-term debt, purchased deposits, discount-window borrowings, short-term borrowings, or Federal Home Loan Bank advances at September 30, 2013.
  • Cash and due from banks were $13.806 million, and interest-bearing deposits were $62.776 million. Management stated that liquidity was sufficient under tested scenarios. The loan-to-deposit ratio was 63.96%, below the company’s internal 65% to 75% policy range.
  • The company was considered well capitalized. Tier 1 and Tier 2 risk-based capital ratios were 22.70% and 23.89%, respectively.

Cash Flow and Dividends

  • Net cash provided by operating activities was $19.003 million for the nine months, compared with $16.237 million in 2012.
  • Investing activities provided $7.040 million, versus using $17.120 million in 2012, largely because of lower securities purchases and changes in interest-bearing deposits.
  • Financing activities used $27.020 million, primarily from a $29.164 million decrease in time deposits and $3.752 million of dividends paid.
  • Dividends declared were $0.54 per share for the nine months, compared with $0.53 in 2012. No dividend was declared in either reported third quarter.

Material Changes Versus Prior Comparable Period

  • Interest income declined 5.0% for the quarter and 5.0% for the nine months, primarily because loan and securities yields decreased.
  • Interest expense declined 28.3% for the quarter and 24.0% for the nine months as deposit pricing and time-deposit balances fell.
  • Net interest income declined 1.2% for the quarter and 1.2% for the nine months, despite lower funding costs.
  • The provision for loan losses declined 61.0% for the quarter and 47.9% for the nine months, reflecting improved credit trends and lower net charge-offs.
  • Noninterest expense increased 0.6% for the quarter and 3.7% for the nine months. Increases included franchise taxes, other operating expenses, data processing, FDIC assessments, and credit-card processing costs.
  • Nine-month trust income fell 16.4%, BOLI income fell 9.8%, and realized securities gains declined to $2,000 from $33,000. Other income increased 47.2%.
  • Real estate construction loans increased 9.36% from year-end and public-sector loans increased 8.27%, while commercial non-real-estate loans fell 16.12% and consumer non-real-estate loans fell 10.03%.
  • The company adopted revised allowance methodology and separately identified investor-owned residential real estate loans beginning in 2013. Management stated that these changes did not have a significant impact on the allowance calculation.

Credit Quality, Outlook, Risks, and Unusual Items

  • Nonperforming loans were $11.236 million, down from $13.021 million at December 31, 2012 but above $6.130 million at September 30, 2012. Nonperforming assets were $12.209 million, or 2.06% of loans plus other real estate owned, versus 2.44% at year-end.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $8.090 million, or 1.37% of loans, compared with 1.41% at year-end. The allowance covered 72.00% of nonperforming loans, down from 64.12% at year-end and 134.65% at September 30, 2012.
  • Annualized net charge-offs were 0.36% of average loans, compared with 0.54% for the first nine months of 2012 and 0.49% for full-year 2012.
  • Accruing troubled debt restructurings were $6.545 million, and total troubled debt restructurings were $7.587 million, up from $4.156 million at December 31, 2012. Six loans totaling $4.576 million were restructured during the first nine months.
  • Properties totaling approximately $3.784 million were in various stages of foreclosure and could increase other real estate owned in future periods. Management stated that the eventual amount cannot be predicted accurately.
  • Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities had substantial unrealized losses due primarily to interest-rate and market fluctuations. Management classified the securities as temporarily impaired and stated that it did not intend, and was not expected, to sell them before recovery of amortized cost.
  • The company’s outlook remains exposed to interest rates, economic conditions, unemployment, real estate values, deposit flows, loan demand, competition, regulation, technology-related fraud, securities-market conditions, and the financial condition of borrowers. Management noted that the regional economy showed mixed recovery and continued elevated unemployment.
  • There were no material legal proceedings, material subsequent events, long-term debt, or material changes in off-balance-sheet arrangements reported.
  • Management identified a material weakness in internal control over the timely classification of certain loans as impaired and nonaccrual following a March 2013 regulatory examination. Additional review procedures, segregated duties, and a task force review of commercial relationships over $500,000 were implemented and deemed effective as of September 30, 2013.

Investor Verification Checklist

  • Verify the sustainability of earnings as lower deposit costs offset declining loan and securities yields.
  • Monitor nonperforming loans, troubled debt restructurings, foreclosure activity, charge-offs, and the 72% allowance coverage ratio.
  • Assess the potential effect of the $26.208 million of unrealized losses on temporarily impaired securities if interest rates or liquidity conditions change.
  • Review the remediation and ongoing effectiveness of controls over impaired and nonaccrual loan classification.
  • Evaluate deposit runoff, particularly the decline in time deposits, and the company’s ability to maintain liquidity while keeping the loan-to-deposit ratio within policy.
  • Assess exposure to southwest Virginia employment, university funding, commercial real estate, construction lending, and local real estate values.
  • Confirm that future allowance requirements, regulatory capital levels, and dividend capacity remain consistent with current reported conditions.