Oak Valley Bancorp quarterly report, Q1 FY2024

Oak Valley Bancorp — Q1 2024 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2024; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2023 unless noted. Oak Valley Bancorp is the parent of Oak Valley Community Bank, a California community bank focused primarily on commercial and real estate lending. Figures below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are generally in millions.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ1 2024 / March 31, 2024Comparable period / prior date
Interest income$19.992 million$19.996 million in Q1 2023
Net interest income$17.241 million$19.543 million in Q1 2023; down 11.8%
Net interest margin4.09%4.39% in Q1 2023
Net income$5.727 million$9.225 million in Q1 2023; down 37.9%
EPS / diluted EPS$0.70 / $0.69$1.13 / $1.12 in Q1 2023
Non-interest income$1.519 million$1.655 million in Q1 2023; down 8.2%
Non-interest expense$11.529 million$9.757 million in Q1 2023; up 18.2%
Total assets$1,805.739 million$1,842.422 million at year-end
Gross loans / net loans$1,039.509 million / $1,027.323 millionGross loans up 2.3% from year-end
Deposits$1,612.400 million$1,650.534 million at year-end; down 2.3%
Cash and cash equivalents$169.729 million$216.568 million at year-end; down 21.6%
Available-for-sale securities$505.091 million fair value$518.078 million at year-end
Shareholders’ equity$166.916 million$166.092 million at year-end

Net interest margin is reported as 4.09%. The MD&A also presents taxable-equivalent net interest income of $17.801 million, versus $20.205 million in Q1 2023; this differs from the GAAP statement amounts above.

Q1 operating cash flow was $8.284 million, investing cash flow was negative $15.016 million, and financing cash flow was negative $40.107 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined by $46.839 million. Financing outflows included a $50.464 million net decline in demand and savings deposits, partly offset by a $12.330 million increase in time deposits, and $1.866 million of dividends paid.

The company reported no outstanding borrowings, including FHLB advances. The Bank’s March 31 capital ratios were 14.9% total capital, 14.0% Tier 1 and common equity Tier 1, and 10.0% Tier 1 leverage; each exceeded the applicable minimums shown in the filing. The allowance for credit losses was $10.922 million, or 1.05% of gross loans.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Net income fell $3.498 million from Q1 2023. Management attributed the decline mainly to higher deposit interest costs, increased operating expenses, and the absence of the prior-year $460,000 reversal of credit-loss provisions.
  • Deposit interest expense increased to $2.751 million from $0.452 million; average cost of funds rose to 0.67% from 0.10%. Earning-asset yield increased 25 basis points, partly offsetting higher funding costs.
  • Operating expenses rose $1.772 million, including higher salaries and benefits (+$883,000), other operating expenses (+$729,000), data processing (+$88,000), and regulatory assessments (+$95,000).
  • Deposits declined $38.134 million during the quarter, including a $58.061 million decline in demand deposits. Management cited rate competition and seasonal fluctuations; time deposits increased.
  • Available-for-sale securities had $33.434 million of gross unrealized losses at March 31, compared with $30.144 million at year-end. Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased to $22.328 million from $19.156 million, after a $3.172 million after-tax quarterly loss.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • No specific earnings, revenue, margin, or loan-growth guidance is provided. Management expects non-interest expense to continue increasing with business growth, while stating it intends to limit increases through cost control.
  • Management expects available cash and other funding sources to meet operating, investing, financing, and regulatory liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months. Liquid assets were $439.8 million, or 24.4% of assets, versus $489.0 million, or 26.5%, at year-end.
  • Available secondary liquidity included approximately $341.3 million of FHLB borrowing capacity, a $70 million correspondent-bank federal funds line, and approximately $31.3 million of FRB Discount Window capacity; none was drawn at quarter-end.
  • Credit quality indicators were strong at quarter-end: no non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due, other real estate owned, or collateral-dependent loans. However, $25.749 million of loans were graded special mention and $4.715 million substandard. Commercial real estate represented approximately 87% of loans, exposing the portfolio to real estate and local economic conditions.
  • Management said unrealized securities losses primarily reflected higher market yields rather than credit deterioration; it reported no allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale securities and did not expect to need to sell them before recovery or maturity. This assessment depends on liquidity and market conditions.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments to extend credit were $179.2 million, including $3.7 million in letters of credit. The filing states utilization and resulting effects on cash flows cannot be predicted. Unfunded low-income housing tax-credit investment commitments were $9.781 million.
  • Risks highlighted include interest-rate and deposit-cost changes, deposit competition, real estate concentrations, economic and collateral-value weakness, liquidity and capital requirements, and broader banking-sector, cybersecurity, regulatory, and geopolitical risks. The company reported no material change to its previously disclosed risk factors, no material pending or threatened legal proceedings, and effective disclosure controls.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether deposit outflows and higher deposit pricing persist, and how they affect funding costs, net interest margin, and cash balances.
  • Loan portfolio performance, especially commercial real estate exposures, special-mention and substandard credits, and the adequacy of the allowance as loans grow.
  • Whether the bank can maintain liquidity without selling securities at a loss; review the unrealized securities losses and the availability and terms of contingent funding sources.
  • Whether rising staffing, operating, and FDIC assessment costs remain proportionate to business growth.
  • The distinction between GAAP net interest income and the higher taxable-equivalent amount presented in MD&A when comparing reported results.