PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2017

Business context and reporting period

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation’s unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The company operates through banking and private wealth management, with significant lending and deposit activity in New Jersey and New York. Comparisons below are with Q1 2016 for operating results and December 31, 2016 for balance-sheet measures.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ1 2017 / March 31, 2017Comparable period / prior year-end
Total revenue (net interest income plus other income)$32.6 million$29.7 million, Q1 2016
Net income$8.0 million$5.5 million, Q1 2016
Diluted EPS$0.46$0.34, Q1 2016
Net interest income$25.6 million; $25.8 million fully tax-equivalent$23.4 million; $23.6 million fully tax-equivalent, Q1 2016
Net interest margin2.71% fully tax-equivalent2.82%, Q1 2016
Operating expenses$19.3 million$19.2 million, Q1 2016
Total assets$3.95 billion$3.88 billion, December 31, 2016
Loans / deposits$3.44 billion / $3.43 billion; loans-to-deposits 100.26%$3.31 billion / $3.41 billion; 97.08%, December 31, 2016
Allowance for loan losses$33.6 million; 0.98% of loans$32.2 million; 0.97%, December 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$119.0 million$162.7 million, December 31, 2016
Shareholders’ equity$340.9 million$324.2 million, December 31, 2016

Annualized return on average assets was 0.82% and return on average equity was 9.62%. Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.5 million versus $3.7 million in Q1 2016; investing activities used $124.6 million, principally reflecting loan growth, and financing activities provided $57.4 million.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Net income increased 45% and diluted EPS rose from $0.34 to $0.46. Results included a $662,000 income-tax benefit from adopting share-based compensation accounting, adding approximately $0.04 to EPS; reported growth therefore includes a material nonrecurring benefit.
  • Net interest income grew 9% on a fully tax-equivalent basis, supported by higher average loan balances. Net interest margin nevertheless declined 11 basis points, reflecting subordinated-debt costs and higher liquidity.
  • Loans increased about $127.5 million from year-end, including growth in commercial, residential mortgage, and commercial real estate lending. Multifamily loans remained the largest portfolio class, at approximately 43% of loans.
  • Wealth management fee income rose 12% to $4.8 million; assets under administration increased 15% year over year to $3.8 billion.
  • Operating expenses were nearly flat overall: higher compensation from strategic hiring was largely offset by lower FDIC assessments.
  • Nonperforming assets rose to $12.2 million from $11.8 million at year-end. Nonaccrual loans were $11.5 million; there were no loans over 90 days past due and still accruing.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • Management said it expects higher operating expenses in 2017 and beyond and identified the ability to generate revenue to offset strategic-plan costs as a risk. A newly hired equipment-financing team is expected to contribute revenue and profitability only after several quarters.
  • Management described plans to grow commercial and C&I lending, expand wealth management, and manage multifamily loans down as a share of the portfolio over time; it cautioned that this portfolio shift may not occur evenly each quarter. No specific earnings or revenue guidance was provided.
  • Management said liquidity was adequate. Available sources included $119.0 million in cash and equivalents, $300.2 million in available-for-sale securities, and unused borrowing commitments of $1.1 billion from the FHLB, $614.2 million from the Federal Reserve, and $22.0 million from correspondent banks.
  • At March 31, total capital to risk-weighted assets was 13.41% at the company and 13.05% at the Bank; the Bank’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.61%. The filing states the Bank exceeded regulatory “well capitalized” thresholds. Debt included $48.8 million of subordinated notes, $58.8 million of FHLB advances, and $34.6 million of overnight FHLB borrowings.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity modeling estimated that a sustained 200-basis-point rate increase would raise first-year net interest income by 6.3%, while a 100-basis-point decrease would lower it by 6.2%. Management noted that model assumptions limit the precision of these estimates.
  • Key disclosed risks include credit and real-estate concentration, potential local economic weakness, margin pressure, funding and liquidity needs, rising operating costs, interest-rate and securities valuation changes, regulatory costs, and cybersecurity threats. Management reported no material litigation, no material change in risk factors, and effective disclosure controls.
  • The company’s securities portfolio had $2.4 million of gross unrealized losses; management considered these temporary and reported no other-than-temporary impairment. One trust-preferred security was rated below investment grade, and management said it monitors the issuer.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. How much of the earnings improvement persists after excluding the $662,000 tax benefit, and whether subsequent quarters support the reported growth.
  2. Whether loan growth, particularly commercial real estate and C&I, remains consistent with underwriting standards and is matched by stable, appropriately priced deposits.
  3. Whether margin pressure continues as funding costs change and the subordinated notes and brokered or reciprocal deposits affect the cost of funds.
  4. How nonperforming assets, criticized loans, charge-offs, and the allowance develop relative to rapid loan growth and the portfolio’s real-estate concentration.
  5. Whether cash balances, borrowing capacity, and capital remain adequate as loans grow; also monitor the effect of the planned equipment-financing and wealth-management expansion on expenses and revenue.