Science Applications International Corp quarterly report, Q2 FY2018

Business context and reporting period

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) filed this unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended August 4, 2017, the second quarter of fiscal 2018. SAIC provides technical, engineering and enterprise IT services, primarily to U.S. government customers; more than 95% of fiscal 2017 revenue came from U.S. government contracts. Following management reporting changes, the company reports one operating and reportable segment.

Key financial metrics

MetricThree months ended Aug. 4, 2017Six months ended Aug. 4, 2017
Revenue$1.078 billion$2.181 billion
Operating income / margin$59 million / 5.5%$122 million / 5.6%
Net income$36 million$85 million
Diluted EPS$0.80$1.88
Operating cash flowCash used of $35 millionCash provided of $53 million

Six-month capital expenditures were $7 million. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $148 million at quarter-end ($140 million unrestricted cash). Debt was $1.064 billion net of issuance costs, including $58 million current; $25 million borrowed on the revolver shortly before quarter-end was repaid August 18. The $200 million revolving facility had $175 million available at August 4, and SAIC reported compliance with its debt covenants. The company declared and paid $0.31 per share in quarterly dividends.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Revenue declined 2% in the quarter and 6% for the six months year over year. The six-month comparison included an estimated $88 million from an extra week in the prior-year period; adjusted internal revenue contracted 1.4% for the quarter and 1.6% for the six months.
  • Operating margin fell from 6.4% to 5.5% for the quarter and from 5.9% to 5.6% for the six months. Management cited less favorable contract-estimate adjustments, lower supply-chain contract profitability, and higher severance or facility costs. Six-month unfavorable estimate changes were associated in part with U.S. Marine Corps platform-program testing and mission requirements.
  • Net income was down $1 million for the quarter but up $15 million for the six months. Lower taxes contributed materially: adoption of share-based compensation accounting produced tax benefits of $4 million for the quarter and $20 million for the six months. Six-month effective tax rate was 15.8%, versus 36.4% a year earlier.
  • Six-month operating cash flow decreased $5 million to $53 million. Reduced customer collections were a key headwind, including a government payment-system issue that delayed $45 million; the filing also cites lower collections overall. Quarter operating cash flow was negative $35 million versus positive $23 million a year earlier.
  • Total backlog rose to $9.241 billion from $8.020 billion at fiscal year-end, mostly from large awards. Funded backlog was $1.805 billion; negotiated unfunded backlog was $7.436 billion.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

Management’s long-term financial targets, expected on average over time, are low-single-digit annual internal revenue growth, annual margin expansion of 10–20 basis points, and returning capital in excess of operating needs. These are targets, not a specific quarterly or full-year forecast. Management expects to fund working capital and other needs with cash, future operating cash flows and, if needed, revolving-credit borrowings; it believes resources are adequate for short- and long-term needs, while noting financing availability depends on market and company factors.

  • Government budget changes, shutdowns, sequestration, debt-ceiling issues, competitive bidding and pricing pressure could affect results. Government customers may modify or cancel contracts; much of backlog, especially unfunded amounts and future IDIQ task orders, is not assured revenue.
  • SAIC committed to approximately $50 million of long-lead materials for an anticipated Marine Corps Assault Amphibious Vehicle low-rate initial production phase before award. A subsequent partial award reduced the commitment for the not-yet-awarded portion to approximately $30 million. Failure to receive the remaining award could impair profitability.
  • Government audits of indirect costs remained open for fiscal 2012 and later years. SAIC recorded a $39 million liability for estimated customer refunds or adjustments. Audit outcomes could exceed reserves and adversely affect profitability. Management said routine legal claims were not expected to have a material adverse effect.
  • The Department of Defense accepted the final termination proposal for the BCTM program in July 2017; approximately $2 million remained receivable, with administrative closeout expected in the second half of fiscal 2018.
  • Contract estimate changes increased operating income by $1 million in the quarter but reduced it by $4 million for the six months; the prior-year comparable changes increased operating income by $7 million and $13 million, respectively.
  • SAIC is preparing for revenue-recognition standard adoption in fiscal 2019 and has not determined its impact. It adopted new share-based compensation rules in fiscal 2018, affecting tax expense and cash-flow presentation.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether delayed government collections normalize and improve operating cash flow and receivables.
  • Whether margins recover as contract cost estimates, Marine Corps program costs and supply-chain contract profitability develop.
  • How much of the large unfunded backlog converts to funded task orders and revenue, and the pace of backlog execution.
  • Whether SAIC receives the remaining Marine Corps production award and can recover its approximately $30 million residual materials commitment.
  • Potential outcomes of government audits relative to the $39 million reserve, and compliance with debt covenants and leverage limits.
  • The extent to which earnings growth depends on share-based compensation tax benefits rather than operating performance.