Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2015

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. — Q1 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2015; balance-sheet comparisons are against December 31, 2014. Amounts are in U.S. dollars; financial statement figures are in millions unless noted. The company provides commercial banking and investment management and trust services.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 2015Comparison
Net interest income$21.6 millionUp 6.9% from Q1 2014
Non-interest income$9.7 millionUp 2.1%
Net income$9.3 millionUp 13.2% from $8.2 million
Diluted earnings per share$0.62Versus $0.56
Net interest margin3.72%Versus 3.76%
Efficiency ratio56.4%Versus 58.6%
Annualized return on average assets / equity1.49% / 14.18%Versus 1.41% / 14.14%

Total revenue, calculated as net interest income plus non-interest income, was approximately $31.3 million, up about 5.3%. Income before taxes was $13.5 million. The effective tax rate was 31.5%, compared with 30.8%.

Financial position, cash flow and credit

  • Assets and loans: Total assets were $2.512 billion, down 2.0% from year-end, largely reflecting lower securities and cash balances. Loans were $1.874 billion, up $5.5 million; net loans were $1.849 billion.
  • Deposits and borrowings: Deposits totaled $2.110 billion, down $13.4 million. Short-term borrowings were $74.3 million ($59.9 million in repurchase agreements and $14.4 million in federal funds purchased); FHLB advances were $36.7 million.
  • Liquidity: Cash and cash equivalents were $57.5 million, down $16.7 million during the quarter. Available-for-sale securities had a fair value of $471.7 million, of which $221.5 million was unpledged. The company reported $399.7 million of available FHLB credit and $70 million in correspondent-bank federal funds lines. Core deposits represented 98% of deposits.
  • Cash flows: Operating activities provided $6.6 million and investing activities provided $36.7 million; financing activities used $60.0 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended the quarter at $57.5 million, versus $74.2 million at year-end.
  • Credit quality: No loan-loss provision was recorded, versus $350,000 in Q1 2014. The allowance was $24.9 million, or 1.33% of loans. Net charge-offs were $38,000. Non-performing loans were $11.5 million (0.62% of loans), and non-performing assets were $17.4 million (0.69% of assets).
  • Capital: Stockholders’ equity was $267.6 million. The consolidated total risk-based capital, common equity Tier 1, and leverage ratios were 13.82%, 12.63%, and 10.41%, respectively. Management reported that Bancorp and the Bank met applicable capital requirements, including new Basel III rules effective January 1, 2015.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Earnings growth reflected higher net interest income, no loan-loss provision, and higher non-interest income; higher expenses and taxes partly offset those gains. Loan and earning-asset growth and lower time-deposit costs supported net interest income, while lower yields weighed on margin.
  • Mortgage banking revenue rose 40.8% to $828,000, attributed to increased refinancing and purchase activity. Bankcard revenue rose 4.4%; brokerage fees fell 8.7%, and trust revenue was nearly flat.
  • Non-interest expense increased 1.3%. The comparison included a $343,000 gain on other real estate in Q1 2014, versus a $20,000 loss in Q1 2015. Data processing and occupancy costs declined.
  • Available-for-sale securities fell $41.4 million, principally as short-term securities matured. Deposits decreased 0.6%; federal funds purchased declined $33.0 million.
  • Management expected slower growth in investment management and trust revenue in 2015 because some revenue that boosted 2014 results was not expected to recur. It expected overdraft-related service charges to decline slightly and bankcard revenue to remain broadly consistent with 2014 levels. The filing gives no overall earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Interest-rate simulation estimated lower net interest income under both rising and falling rate scenarios: down 3.28% with a 100-basis-point increase, 4.20% with a 200-basis-point increase, and 2.42% with a 100-basis-point decrease. A 200-basis-point decrease was considered not reasonably possible in the prevailing low-rate environment.

Risks, contingencies and other notable items

  • Management identified loan-loss allowance estimates as a critical accounting policy; actual losses could differ from estimates. Credit quality also depends on economic conditions, borrower finances, collateral values, and real estate and business activity.
  • Commitments to extend credit, including standby letters of credit, totaled $492.3 million. Management considered them normal banking transactions and did not anticipate significant losses. Pending legal proceedings were not expected by management, after consultation with counsel, to have a material adverse effect.
  • Management cautioned that results are subject to economic, competitive, regulatory, interest-rate, liquidity, and customer-credit risks. It reported no material changes to the risk factors in the 2014 Form 10-K.
  • Q1 other comprehensive income was $1.9 million, mainly reflecting unrealized securities gains. The company paid $3.4 million in dividends, or $0.23 per share. Share purchases reported during the quarter were shares withheld for employee tax obligations, not purchases under an active repurchase plan.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the absence of a loan-loss provision is supported by subsequent credit performance, allowance assumptions, and non-performing loan trends.
  • How deposit balances and customer liquidity needs develop, given quarter-end deposit declines and management’s warning that historically high customer balances could fall.
  • Whether net interest margin and earnings respond as modeled to interest-rate changes, including the effects of variable-rate loan floors and deposit repricing.
  • Whether trust-fee growth, mortgage activity, and other non-interest income meet management’s stated expectations, and whether expense changes persist.
  • The company’s capital and liquidity headroom under Basel III requirements and any future regulatory or credit-quality changes.