TIPTREE INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2011

Filing summary: Care Investment Trust Inc. (not Tiptree Inc.)

Reporting period: Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011. The filing is for Care Investment Trust Inc., a healthcare-focused REIT; it describes Tiptree as its controlling investor. Results use successor accounting after Tiptree’s August 2010 acquisition of control and push-down purchase accounting, so comparisons with 2010 predecessor results are not fully like-for-like.

Business context and financial highlights

Care held 14 senior-living properties leased to Bickford, interests in medical-office and senior-living investments, and one remaining mortgage loan. At June 30, the company reported $110.4 million of wholly owned real estate, $29.4 million invested in partially owned entities, and a $7.0 million loan investment.

MetricQ2 2011Six months 2011
Total revenue$3.474 million$6.995 million
Net income (loss)$1.067 million$(46,000)
Basic EPS$0.11$(0.00)
FFO / AFFO, non-GAAP$1.921 million / $1.440 million$4.263 million / $3.526 million
Cash from operating activitiesNot separately stated$3.199 million
Cash from investing activitiesNot separately stated$7.447 million
Cash from financing activitiesNot separately stated$(1.740) million

Amounts are in U.S. dollars; statement figures are in thousands unless otherwise noted. The filing does not provide a clear operating-margin measure. Net income included a substantial equity-method investment contribution in Q2, including a $1.2 million Cambridge preferred return, and should not be read as a direct measure of property operating performance.

Liquidity, debt and distributions

  • Cash and cash equivalents were $13.938 million at June 30, versus $5.032 million at December 31, 2010. Total assets were $163.479 million, total liabilities $83.620 million, and mortgage notes payable $81.240 million.
  • The two fixed-rate Bickford mortgages mature in July 2015 and have stated rates of 6.845% and 7.17%; annual debt service is approximately $7.7 million. Prepayment restrictions limit refinancing before 2015.
  • Care paid a $0.135-per-share dividend in the second quarter and declared another $0.135-per-share dividend for payment September 1, 2011. Management said it believed current liquidity and cash flows were adequate for short-term needs and contractual obligations. The company had no revolving credit facility or other credit line.

Changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Q2 revenue decreased 3.2% year over year to $3.474 million; rental revenue rose modestly, but loan-investment income fell to $198,000 from $403,000.
  • Q2 net income improved from a $1.902 million loss in 2010 to $1.067 million income. Partially owned entities contributed $1.384 million of income versus a $876,000 loss in the prior-year quarter; management fees and general and administrative expenses also declined.
  • Six-month revenue fell 7.3% to $6.995 million, while the net loss narrowed to $46,000 from $10.332 million. Lower loan income was partly offset by lower management/buyout costs and improved results from partially owned entities.
  • Six-month operating cash flow improved to $3.199 million from $2.624 million used in 2010. The comparison benefited from the absence of the $7.5 million former-manager buyout payment made in 2010.
  • Non-GAAP FFO and AFFO improved from the prior-year six-month losses of $4.073 million and $5.304 million, respectively. The company cautions these measures are not substitutes for GAAP earnings or operating cash flow.

Management commentary, material events and risks

  • Bickford covenant issue: Low occupancy at two of 14 properties caused a lease NOI-to-rent-coverage covenant default. A lease default may also constitute a default under both related mortgages, and potential lender action includes acceleration. Care had not received a mortgage notice of default; management was communicating with the servicer and expected no material impact, while monitoring the matter and considering a waiver or modification.
  • Remaining loan: Care’s variable-rate $7.0 million loan, secured by senior-care properties, had been extended several times and was scheduled to mature August 19, 2011; lenders and borrowers were negotiating a further extension through October 15. One borrower sued three of the four lenders. Care was not named but disclosed indemnification obligations to a named lender. Contractual default interest was accruing but was not currently payable or recognized as income.
  • Cambridge restructuring: Effective April 15, 2011, a settlement ended related litigation and changed Care’s investment to a fixed $40 million investment with a 14% preferred return and a targeted 12% operating cash distribution rate. Cambridge retained rights to 200,000 nonconvertible OP units, and received a warrant to buy 300,000 Care shares at $6.00. The filing reports Cambridge’s portfolio was approximately 92% leased.
  • SMC disposition: In May, three of four properties in the Senior Management Concepts portfolio were sold. Care received approximately $6.2 million net proceeds; it retained an interest in the remaining Utah property, reported at approximately 89% occupancy. Care recorded an approximately $77,000 impairment on its SMC investment due to lower occupancy.
  • Management described acquisitions as dependent on suitable opportunities and available financing; there was no quantified earnings or acquisition guidance. Care cited risks including healthcare regulation, interest rates, capital availability, operator and borrower performance, real-estate conditions, and REIT qualification. Maintaining REIT status requires distributing at least 90% of REIT taxable income.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the Bickford coverage default is cured or waived, and whether either mortgage lender takes action.
  2. Repayment or further extension of the remaining loan, borrower litigation developments, and any resulting indemnification exposure.
  3. Cash generation and the sustainability of the $0.135 quarterly dividend, considering REIT distribution requirements and the absence of a credit facility.
  4. Cambridge preferred-return collections and the terms, valuation and potential dilution associated with the OP units and $6.00 warrant.
  5. Occupancy, cash distributions and impairment risk at the remaining SMC property and across the Bickford portfolio.
  6. Comparability of reported results: 2010 is a predecessor period, and 2011 reflects post-acquisition push-down accounting; review GAAP earnings alongside FFO, AFFO and cash flows.