COLONY BANKCORP INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

Colony Bankcorp, Inc. — Q3 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The unaudited consolidated statements cover Colony Bankcorp and its wholly owned bank subsidiary; balance-sheet comparisons are against December 31, 2011. Amounts below are in millions unless otherwise noted.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2012 / Sep. 30, 2012Comparable period / prior year-end
Net income$0.772 million for Q3; $2.073 million for nine months$0.558 million for Q3 2011; $2.153 million for nine months 2011
Net income available to common; diluted EPS$0.411 million; $0.05 for Q3. $1.003 million; $0.12 for nine months$0.208 million; $0.02 for Q3 2011. $1.103 million; $0.13 for nine months 2011
Net interest income$9.222 million Q3; $27.197 million nine months$8.743 million Q3 2011; $26.142 million nine months 2011
Net interest margin3.39% for nine months3.05% for nine months 2011
Provision for loan losses$1.742 million Q3; $5.627 million nine months$2.250 million Q3 2011; $6.000 million nine months 2011
Total assets; stockholders’ equity$1,097.4 million; $96.4 million$1,195.4 million; $96.6 million at Dec. 31, 2011
Loans; deposits$726.5 million; $941.2 million$716.3 million; $1,000.0 million at Dec. 31, 2011
Cash and cash equivalents$65.0 million at quarter-end$83.4 million at Dec. 31, 2011
Borrowings$54.2 million total, including $24.2 million subordinated debentures and $30.0 million other borrowing$95.2 million total at Dec. 31, 2011

For the nine months, operating cash flow was $17.4 million, investing cash flow was positive $64.0 million, and financing cash flow was negative $99.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined $18.3 million. The filing reports $74.2 million of cash and short-term investments, including interest-bearing bank deposits.

Material changes and operating trends

  • Q3 net income rose 38% year over year, as higher net interest income and noninterest income and lower loan-loss provision more than offset higher expenses and taxes. Nine-month net income fell 3.7%; noninterest expense increased $1.39 million and noninterest income declined $0.11 million, partly offset by higher net interest income and lower provision.
  • Nine-month taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $1.02 million. The 34-basis-point improvement in margin reflected lower funding costs, while average earning assets fell $74.9 million and average loans fell $57.9 million.
  • Nine-month noninterest income was nearly flat year over year. Securities gains were $2.07 million; premiums on guaranteed-loan sales fell to $0.31 million from $0.86 million. Noninterest expense increased 5.7%, including higher staffing costs tied to regulatory compliance and increased credit-related OREO and foreclosure expenses.
  • Loans grew 1.4% from year-end, while deposits fell 5.9%. Other borrowed money declined by $41 million through principal payments. Available-for-sale securities declined to $242.1 million from $303.9 million.
  • Nonperforming assets fell to $51.7 million from $59.7 million at year-end and $63.3 million a year earlier; the ratio to loans and foreclosed assets improved to 6.96% from 8.10% and 8.31%, respectively. Nonaccrual loans were $34.3 million. Other real estate owned was $17.1 million, down from $20.4 million at year-end.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management expected continued net interest margin improvement in 2012, citing loan and deposit pricing, and anticipated elevated charge-offs during 2012 as problem credits moved through resolution. Management stated the allowance was adequate at quarter-end; future provisions remain sensitive to collateral values, credit performance, economic conditions and regulatory judgments.
  • The loan-loss allowance was $14.4 million, or 1.98% of loans, versus $15.7 million, or 2.18%, at year-end. Nine-month net charge-offs were $6.9 million. Management refined its allowance methodology, including changes to qualitative factors and the loss-history period; the changes reduced the allowance estimate by $3.422 million. The company also reported $5.627 million of provision for the nine-month period.
  • Credit risk remains concentrated: approximately 85% of loans were secured by real estate, with exposure to real estate markets in the company’s Georgia service areas. Management cited ongoing problem loans and vulnerability of collateral and foreclosed-property values to market conditions.
  • The bank remained subject to a regulatory Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), including requirements to reduce adversely classified assets, manage commercial real estate concentration, improve earnings and obtain regulatory consent before dividends. The MOU requires at least 8% Tier 1 capital to average assets and 10% total risk-based capital. At quarter-end the bank reported 10.09% and 16.68%, respectively. Management said applicable capital adequacy requirements were met.
  • Common dividends had been suspended since 2009, and regulators restricted their payment without prior approval. In February 2012 the company also suspended dividends on its Treasury TARP preferred stock and interest payments on trust preferred securities. At September 30, preferred dividends in arrears, including accrued interest, were $1.25 million; accrued unpaid trust-preferred interest was $0.419 million. Treasury planned an individual auction of the preferred securities; no auction date was given.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments included $54.5 million of loan commitments and $1.3 million of letters of credit. Management said their contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Ordinary-course legal proceedings were pending, but management did not expect them to materially affect consolidated financial position.
  • The filing gives no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautioned that nine-month results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. It identified interest-rate movements, regional economic conditions, credit reserves, real estate values, regulation and the MOU as key risks. No material control changes were reported; disclosure controls were assessed as effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether asset quality, collateral values, charge-offs and nonperforming assets continue to improve, and whether the reduced allowance estimate remains adequate.
  • How sustainable the margin improvement is given lower average earning assets and the continuing low-rate environment.
  • Compliance with the MOU, particularly required capital levels, classified-asset reduction and restrictions on distributions.
  • Any developments in the Treasury auction or repayment of TARP preferred stock, and the accumulated preferred dividends and trust-preferred interest obligations.
  • Deposit trends, funding concentration and available liquidity; reconcile the reported $65.0 million of cash equivalents with the broader $74.2 million cash-and-short-term-investment measure.