FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Unaudited consolidated results for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared with Q1 2011 unless otherwise noted. Balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2011. The company is a Pennsylvania-based bank holding company. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ1 2012 / March 31, 2012Comparable period / prior year-end
Net interest income, GAAP$48.2$47.9 in Q1 2011
Net interest income, fully taxable equivalent$49.4$49.4 in Q1 2011
Net interest margin, fully taxable equivalent3.75%3.87% in Q1 2011
Noninterest income$17.4$14.3 in Q1 2011
Noninterest expense$46.8$41.4 in Q1 2011
Provision for credit losses$3.8$13.8 in Q1 2011
Income before taxes$15.0$7.0 in Q1 2011
Net income; diluted EPS$11.1; $0.11$5.2; $0.05 in Q1 2011
Operating cash flow$19.7$19.4 in Q1 2011
Total assets$5,968.6$5,841.1 at Dec. 31, 2011
Portfolio loans, gross$4,128.6$4,043.6 at Dec. 31, 2011
Total deposits$4,633.8$4,504.7 at Dec. 31, 2011
Shareholders’ equity$767.4$758.5 at Dec. 31, 2011

Net interest income plus noninterest income was approximately $65.6 million, up from $62.2 million in Q1 2011. Cash and cash equivalents were $81.6 million at quarter-end, up $3.1 million during the quarter. Investing activities used $139.3 million, principally reflecting securities purchases and loan growth; financing activities provided $122.7 million, including deposit growth.

Total short-term borrowings were $309.4 million; long-term debt was $101.0 million and subordinated debentures were $105.8 million. Total liabilities were $5,201.3 million. The allowance for credit losses was $60.7 million, or 1.47% of loans, versus $61.2 million, or 1.51%, at year-end.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Net income more than doubled year over year, primarily because the credit-loss provision was $10.0 million lower and gains on asset sales were higher. Higher noninterest expenses partly offset these benefits.
  • Net interest margin declined 12 basis points year over year. The yield on earning assets fell 38 basis points to 4.39%; the cost of interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.79% from 1.10%. Management attributed pressure to repricing in a low-rate environment and described deposit mix, pricing discipline, and investment volumes as partial offsets.
  • Loans grew $84.9 million, or 2%, from year-end. Management cited growth in residential real estate and indirect auto lending, alongside efforts to reduce larger credit exposures. Deposits increased $129.1 million.
  • Credit indicators improved: criticized loans fell $26.5 million, or 9%, to $265.5 million; accruing delinquencies declined $10.2 million, or 29%; and net charge-offs were $4.3 million versus $8.3 million in Q1 2011. Nonperforming loans excluding loans held for sale were $81.6 million, down from $98.8 million at year-end. The broader reported nonperforming-loan total, including $8.1 million of nonperforming loans held for sale, was $89.7 million.
  • Noninterest expense increased 13%, with higher collection and repossession costs, unfunded-commitment reserves, and asset-sale/write-down losses. An updated appraisal prompted a $2.8 million write-down of an OREO property; total losses on sale or write-down of assets were $3.3 million.
  • The company reported $29.96 million of unrealized losses on pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (book value $54.5 million; fair value $24.5 million). No new credit-related impairment charge was recorded in the quarter; management’s cash-flow analysis nevertheless identified seven securities as likely to experience principal and interest shortfalls, for which impairment had been recognized in prior years.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The filing gives no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautions that quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of full-year 2012 performance.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity modeling estimated 12-month net interest income increases of $0.5 million and $2.0 million for gradual +100- and +200-basis-point scenarios, and decreases of $4.1 million and $8.3 million for -100- and -200-basis-point scenarios. Management warns that the model is less reliable in the -200-basis-point scenario and depends on assumptions about balance-sheet behavior and customer pricing.
  • Liquidity sources include core deposits and available borrowing facilities. At March 31, unused capacity was approximately $830.7 million under CDARS and $772.5 million through the Federal Reserve collateral program; FHLB capacity was $1.2 billion, with $245.8 million of borrowings and $15.1 million of letters of credit using capacity. Amounts outstanding under the company’s $15 million unsecured line of credit were zero.
  • The company disclosed that it was not meeting the return-on-average-assets covenant on a $1.1 million ESOP loan guarantee and was working with the lender, expecting a waiver or modification.
  • A class action alleging breach of an IRA account interest-rate commitment had been certified as to the contract claim. Summary-judgment decision was pending after April 4, 2012 argument; the company said it could not estimate a reasonably possible loss.
  • On April 24, 2012, the board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share, payable May 18, a 67% increase from $0.03. Management said future increases would depend on consistent earnings and continued improvement in economic conditions.
  • Regulatory capital ratios exceeded stated minimums. At March 31, the bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 14.2%, Tier 1 risk-based ratio 13.0%, and Tier 1 leverage ratio 11.3%; each exceeded the filing’s “well capitalized” thresholds.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether improving credit quality and lower provision needs persist, particularly in commercial real estate and construction exposures; also monitor the allowance and nonperforming-loan measures, including the treatment of loans held for sale.
  • Valuation and cash-flow assumptions for the pooled trust preferred securities, given their substantial unrealized losses, illiquidity, and potential for future impairment.
  • Whether net interest margin stabilizes as low-rate asset repricing continues, and how actual earnings compare with modeled rate sensitivities.
  • Resolution of the IRA class action and the ESOP loan covenant waiver or modification.
  • Recurring earnings after unusual asset-sale gains and OREO write-downs, and whether the higher dividend remains supportable.