Onemain Holdings, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2017

Onemain Holdings, Inc. — Q2 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017. Dollar amounts are in millions unless otherwise noted. OneMain provides consumer lending, principally personal loans to non-prime customers, and related insurance; it operated nearly 1,700 branches in 44 states.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ2 2017Q2 2016Six months 2017Six months 2016
Interest income$772$741$1,531$1,572
Interest expense$203$214$405$440
Net interest income$569$527$1,126$1,132
Provision for receivable losses$236$214$481$411
Net interest income after provision$333$313$645$721
Income before taxes$66$42$123$294
Net income attributable to OneMain$42$26$75$163
Diluted earnings per share$0.30$0.19$0.55$1.21
  • Balance sheet at June 30: Assets were $18.698 billion, cash and cash equivalents $862 million, restricted cash $545 million, and shareholders’ equity $3.154 billion. Net finance receivables, after unearned insurance premium and claim reserves and the loss allowance, were $12.802 billion.
  • Credit performance: Consolidated net charge-off ratio was 6.62% for Q2 versus 6.05% a year earlier; for the first half it was 7.31% versus 4.82%. The 30–89-day delinquency ratio was 2.19% versus 2.26% for Q2. The allowance for finance receivable losses was $676 million, or 4.81% of receivables.
  • Portfolio and production: Personal loans were $13.9 billion, across more than 2.2 million accounts. Forty percent of personal loans were secured by titled collateral, up from 36% at year-end 2016. Q2 originations were $2.953 billion, compared with $2.557 billion.
  • Cash flows, first half: Operating activities provided $740 million; investing activities used $854 million; financing activities provided $374 million. Cash and restricted cash together increased $260 million to $1.407 billion.
  • Debt and liquidity: Long-term debt carrying value was $14.409 billion, up from $13.959 billion at December 31, 2016. The company had $4.8 billion of conduit capacity with no amounts drawn at quarter-end, in addition to securitization funding. Management said liquidity was adequate for at least 12 months; scheduled remaining 2017 principal and interest payments on debt, excluding securitizations, were $1.0 billion.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 net income and diluted EPS improved year over year, reflecting higher net interest income after provision and lower expenses. Other revenues fell to $121 million from $165 million, including the absence of the prior-year $22 million personal-loan sale gain and a higher debt-repurchase loss.
  • First-half net income attributable to OneMain declined to $75 million from $163 million. The 2016 period included a $167 million gain on the SpringCastle interests sale and $22 million gain on personal-loan sales; 2017 also had a $70 million higher provision for finance receivable losses.
  • Credit costs and charge-offs rose, which management linked in part to delinquencies associated with 2016 branch-transition activity, portfolio growth, and a higher volume of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). Management reported that credit losses began to decline in Q2.
  • OneMain issued $1.0 billion of 6.125% senior notes due 2022 and used part of the proceeds to repurchase approximately $466 million of 6.90% notes due 2017. SFC and OMFH long-term debt ratings were upgraded by Moody’s to B2 and B1, respectively, both with positive outlooks.

Outlook, management commentary, and risks

  • Management expected receivables growth to continue through the remainder of 2017 following completion of the former OneMain branch system conversion in Q1. It expected credit-loss improvement to continue, but cautioned that its strategies might not achieve the expected results. The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Management targeted $275–$300 million of aggregate OneMain acquisition synergies by year-end 2017, including about $200 million of operating-expense reductions and $75–$100 million of costs avoided. It expected approximately $275 million of total acquisition-related expenses; approximately $207 million had been incurred by June 30.
  • Management’s strategy included increasing secured lending, expanding direct auto lending, reducing leverage, and preserving diversified funding and liquidity. It noted that a greater secured-loan mix may lower yields while potentially improving credit losses over time.
  • Key risks include non-investment-grade funding ratings and capital-market access, substantial debt, borrower delinquencies/defaults and credit-model performance, integration execution, regulatory and legal exposure, and changes in economic conditions, interest rates, unemployment, and customer repayment capacity. Insurance subsidiaries face limits on dividends to the parent.
  • A putative federal securities class action filed in 2017 alleges misleading statements about financial projections and post-acquisition integration. OneMain said it considers the allegations without merit and intends to defend the case; it could not estimate a reasonably possible loss. The company also reported an IRS examination of its 2011–2013 federal tax returns and said it had adequately provided for taxes.
  • Management stated that adoption of the expected-credit-loss standard (ASU 2016-13) is expected to have a material financial-statement impact, which was still being quantified; the new lease standard is also expected to have a material impact.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the Q2 improvement in earnings and management’s stated decline in credit losses persist, given higher first-half net charge-offs and provisions.
  • Actual progress on the $275–$300 million synergy target, total integration costs, and the effect of secured-loan growth on yield and credit performance.
  • Debt maturities, refinancing costs, covenant compliance, availability of capital-market funding, and liquidity relative to scheduled obligations.
  • Developments in the securities litigation, regulatory matters, tax examination, and any associated financial exposure.
  • The eventual quantified effects and implementation timing of the expected-credit-loss and lease accounting standards.