ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Business context and reporting period

Filing identity mismatch: The supplied metadata names ARRAY DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., but the filing is United States Cellular Corporation’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed November 9, 2011. This summary reflects the filing itself.

U.S. Cellular, an 84%-owned subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, provides wireless service in 26 states. It reported approximately 5.93 million customers, including 5.62 million retail customers, at quarter-end.

Financial performance and liquidity

Amounts are in millions of dollars unless stated otherwise.

MetricQ3 2011Q3 2010Nine months 2011Nine months 2010
Operating revenue$1,110.4$1,060.8$3,243.7$3,114.5
Operating income$101.6$61.4$264.5$205.5
Net income attributable to U.S. Cellular shareholders$62.1$38.3$172.2$128.3
Diluted earnings per share$0.73$0.44$2.02$1.48
  • Nine-month revenue increased 4%, while operating income rose 29% and shareholder-attributable net income rose 34%. Operating margin was approximately 8.2%, versus 6.6% in the prior-year period.
  • Service revenue increased 4% to $3,023.8 million, led by inbound roaming revenue growth of 37% and higher eligible telecommunications carrier revenue. Retail service revenue was nearly flat as higher ARPU was largely offset by fewer customers.
  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $777.6 million, compared with $584.0 million. Capital expenditures were $506.1 million, up from $379.7 million; reported free cash flow was $271.5 million, versus $204.3 million.
  • At September 30, cash and cash equivalents were $505.0 million, short-term investments $110.8 million, and long-term investments $45.3 million. The $300 million revolving facility was undrawn, with $299.8 million available.
  • Long-term debt carrying value was $880.4 million, plus a $0.1 million current portion. Total equity was $3,683.4 million. The company issued $342 million of 6.95% notes due 2060 and redeemed $330 million of 7.5% notes; reported weighted-average debt interest rate fell to 6.8% from 7.0% at year-end 2010.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Customer base declined to 5.932 million from 6.103 million. Nine-month net retail customer losses were 112,000, versus 6,000 net additions in 2010; postpaid losses worsened to 97,000 from 56,000. Postpaid churn nevertheless improved to 1.4% from 1.5%.
  • Smartphone penetration among postpaid customers rose to 26.2% from 12.1%; smartphones made up 40.6% of devices sold, versus 18.8%. Higher smartphone mix supported ARPU and equipment revenue but raised equipment costs and subsidies.
  • System operations expense rose 8% and equipment cost rose 9% for the nine months. SG&A declined 1%. Roaming expense increased with data usage, while data roaming revenue also grew materially.
  • Operating results included a $13.4 million gain on remeasurement of a previously held investment when the company acquired the remaining interest in a wireless business, and an $11.8 million gain from a spectrum-license exchange. That acquired business was classified as held for sale.
  • The company revised comparative financial statements for previously identified asset-retirement accounting errors, which it assessed as immaterial to the affected periods. The nine-month 2010 net income attributable to shareholders increased by $2.8 million in the revised presentation; operating cash flow was unchanged.

Outlook, commentary, risks and contingencies

  • Full-year 2011 estimates were service revenue of $4.0–$4.1 billion, operating income of $230–$305 million, adjusted OIBDA of $820–$895 million, and capital expenditures of $750–$800 million. Operating-income and adjusted-OIBDA ranges were raised by $20 million from prior estimates; other estimates were unchanged. The company cautioned that actual results may differ materially.
  • Management cited competitive pressure, economic uncertainty, customer losses, data-driven network costs, device subsidies, regulatory changes to universal-service funding and intercarrier compensation, and the timing and cost of LTE deployment as key factors.
  • The company expects ongoing investment in network capacity and multi-year billing/customer-support systems. The Amdocs B/OSS project was expected to run through 2013, with estimated payments of approximately $122 million, subject to adjustments; $22.8 million had been paid by quarter-end.
  • An interim impairment test triggered by market and share-price deterioration found no goodwill or license impairment. However, $945.1 million of licenses were in units whose estimated fair values exceeded carrying values by less than 10%, so further fair-value declines could lead to impairment.
  • The company reported $1.6 million accrued for legal proceedings and unasserted claims and said it did not believe unaccrued contingent losses would be material. It also disclosed a $166.5 million estimated liquidation settlement value for certain finite-lived noncontrolling interests, versus a $65.5 million carrying value; there were no plans to liquidate those entities early.
  • Management expected a federal tax loss in 2011 primarily due to bonus depreciation, with related carryback benefits recorded. It anticipated substantially higher federal tax payments beginning in 2013 if bonus-depreciation provisions were not extended.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Confirm the filing issuer: this document is for United States Cellular Corporation, not the company named in the request metadata.
  2. Assess whether customer losses and competitive pressure could offset improving ARPU, roaming revenue, and smartphone adoption.
  3. Compare actual full-year results with the revised 2011 guidance, especially operating income, adjusted OIBDA, and capital expenditures.
  4. Review sustainability of operating cash flow and free cash flow given higher network investment, device costs, tax timing, and the planned LTE rollout.
  5. Monitor license valuations and the potential for impairment, along with execution and cost risks for the Amdocs system project.