Sho Ito

Hello, I am nobi-nobi-san, an EA developer based in Japan.
I came to the markets in 2020 as a discretionary FX trader. My first contact with
automated trading was the same as yours - as a buyer of EAs. Running commercial
EAs with my own money taught me what makes an EA worth keeping, and also what a
buyer worries about. Combining that with my career as an in-house systems engineer
and programmer, I began building EAs for myself in 2021. For the past five years I
have run them on my own funds, refining and re-testing. In 2026 I finally judged
them ready to hand to others, and I am preparing them for sale.

- On a USD 6,250 account, allowing a 20% maximum drawdown:
an average annual profit of about USD 3,875

Running all three EAs together on a single account, with the lot size set so that
the maximum drawdown stays within 20%, the backtest gives an average annual profit
of about USD 3,875 on a USD 6,250 account - an average over 16 years and 6 months.
The figure is the measured 0.01-lot result scaled to 0.09 lots; because the lot
size is fixed, profit and drawdown scale in direct proportion.

Here is what is behind that number:

* Tested January 2010 - July 2026 (16 years 6 months), 14,137 trades
* Profit factor 1.56
* Recovery factor 54
* All 17 calendar years closed positive
* Every-tick modelling on real tick data, modelling quality 99.90%
* Real variable spread, not a fixed value
* Drawdown is not the sum of each EA's figure - it is measured from the moments
when several EAs carry open losses at the same time

This is a calculation based on historical data and is not a promise of future
profit. There were good years and bad years, and at one point the account fell from
USD 6,250 to about USD 5,060. With that said, it is work I am confident to put my
name to.

All amounts above were converted from Japanese yen on 29 July 2026, at a rate of
1 USD = 160 JPY.

- Not one EA, but a portfolio

A single logic will always meet a market it cannot handle. My answer was
diversification. From the strategies I have tested over five years I kept only
those whose behaviour does not overlap, and combined them into three EAs holding
32 logics in total. No logic is shared between the three. Risk is spread across
13 currency pairs, across different sessions and different days of the week.

- About leverage

I live in Japan and trade through a broker registered in Japan. Japanese regulation
caps retail FX leverage at 1:25, and the Financial Services Agency publishes a
warning list of unregistered offshore brokers. I therefore build my verifiable
track record on a domestically regulated account.

This is not a disadvantage for you. The EAs themselves have no leverage
requirement, and the results above were produced under very low leverage with a
large free-margin buffer. Because the source account runs at low leverage,
subscribers on any leverage can copy it without volume reduction.

- Development policy

* No averaging into losses, no martingale. A design that survives comes first.
* Backtests use real tick data and realistic spreads, and every test condition
is disclosed.
* I publish the weak numbers too - losing years and unfavourable figures included.
* The EA I sell is the same one running on my own live account.

My only rule is this: I sell only the EAs I would run with my own money. I aim for
the kind of disclosure that the buyer I once was would have called enough to decide
on.

图表与思路