AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Filing summary

Important identity and period discrepancy: The supplied filing is for Oroplata Resources, Inc., a Dominican Republic mineral exploration start-up—not American Battery Technology Co. It is a Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2015 (the first quarter of Oroplata’s fiscal 2016), filed February 9, 2016. The financial information below pertains to Oroplata and should not be attributed to the company named in the request metadata.

Business context

Oroplata holds mineral rights to the Mogollon claim in the Dominican Republic. It reported no revenue and had not conducted exploration on Mogollon as of the filing. The company said it expected to undertake exploration before the end of 2016, but did not know the program’s cost. It has one officer/director and no other employees.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricQuarter ended Dec. 31, 2015Comparable 2014 quarter
Revenue$0$0
Total expenses$20,758$12,237
Net/operating loss$(20,758)$(12,237)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$(0.00)$(0.00)
Net cash used in operating activities$(17,973)$(9,952)
Cash at quarter end$12,128$12,410

At December 31, 2015, current assets were $12,128, current liabilities were $123,606, and working capital was negative $111,478. Liabilities included $21,801 in accounts payable and $101,805 due to the sole director/officer. Those advances are non-interest-bearing and payable on demand. Stockholders’ deficit was $111,478; accumulated deficit was $191,478. The filing reports no outstanding debt securities. No interest or income taxes were paid during the quarter. Gross and operating margins are not meaningful because the company had no revenue.

Management estimated $48,941 in cash needs for the next 12 months, including $21,801 of accounts payable; after available cash, its stated funding gap was $36,813. This estimate excludes the unknown cost of Mogollon exploration. Financing in the quarter included $20,155 of advances from the director/officer, compared with $114 in the prior-year quarter.

Material changes and outlook

  • Quarterly expenses and loss rose to $20,758 from $12,237, an increase of approximately 70%; exploration expense was zero versus $5,000 in the prior-year quarter, while general and administrative expense increased to $20,758 from $7,237.
  • Operating cash use increased to $17,973 from $9,952. Related-party advances funded the quarter’s operations and exceeded operating cash use.
  • Management expected continuing losses and said profitability was not anticipated in the near future. Future operations depend on raising capital and, ultimately, successful exploration and mineral sales; there is no assurance funding will be available on favorable terms.
  • The filing states that the company lacked funds to begin Mogollon exploration. It lists possible funding sources, including additional director advances, personally guaranteed institutional borrowing, or a private placement, but says none had been considered by the director at that time.

Risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Going concern: Management stated that the accumulated deficit, negative working capital, lack of profitable operations, and expected further losses raised substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The filing also refers to a going-concern opinion on the September 30, 2015 audited financial statements.
  • Exploration and financing: Mogollon had not been explored, no ore reserve had been identified, and there was no assurance the property would yield commercially viable minerals or revenue. Competition, limited investor interest, and uncertain access to capital could prevent exploration or development.
  • Related-party dependence: The company relies on advances from its sole director/officer; the $101,805 balance is payable on demand and has no formal loan agreement described in MD&A.
  • Controls: Management concluded disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were ineffective. Cited material weaknesses included no separate audit committee or fraud policy, ineffective period-end reporting controls with out-of-period adjustments, and inadequate personnel and monitoring.
  • Other exposures: Management noted potential Dominican peso exchange-rate effects on exploration costs and risks from thin trading and penny-stock status. No legal proceedings or off-balance-sheet arrangements were reported; no subsequent events were identified for disclosure.

Most important facts to verify

  • Confirm the issuer identity: this filing names Oroplata Resources, Inc., not American Battery Technology Co.
  • Confirm the reporting period and comparatives: quarter ended December 31, 2015 versus December 31, 2014.
  • Verify the $101,805 related-party payable, its demand terms, and the company’s ability to meet current obligations.
  • Confirm that the $36,813 estimated funding gap excludes exploration costs and whether any financing was subsequently secured.
  • Assess the status, legal standing, and exploration prospects of the Mogollon claim, given that no exploration had begun and no reserve was established.
  • Review remediation of the disclosed material weaknesses and the reliability of period-end financial reporting.