AMES NATIONAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

Ames National Corporation — 2012 Q1 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

Ames National Corporation is a bank holding company operating five central Iowa banks. Its principal activities are commercial and consumer lending, deposit services, trust services and investment services. This unaudited filing covers the three months ended March 31, 2012, with comparisons to the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the December 31, 2011 balance sheet.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ1 2012Comparable period or prior date
Net income$3.543 million$3.473 million in Q1 2011
Basic and diluted EPS$0.38$0.37 in Q1 2011
Net interest income$7.713 million$7.398 million in Q1 2011
Total noninterest income$1.901 million$1.818 million in Q1 2011
Total noninterest expense$4.839 million$4.580 million in Q1 2011
Net interest margin3.41%3.53% in Q1 2011
Return on assets1.33%1.40% in Q1 2011
Efficiency ratio50.34%49.70% in Q1 2011, per management discussion
Total assets$1.095 billion$1.036 billion at December 31, 2011
Net loans$444.257 million$438.651 million at December 31, 2011
Available-for-sale securities$525.764 million$508.625 million at December 31, 2011
Total deposits$879.732 million$818.705 million at December 31, 2011
Total stockholders’ equity$137.114 million$134.557 million at December 31, 2011
Operating cash flow$6.246 million provided$5.266 million provided in Q1 2011

Interest income increased 0.7% while interest expense declined 14.3%, primarily because of lower deposit rates. The effective income tax rate was approximately 25%. The quarterly dividend increased to $0.15 per share from $0.13 per share.

Material changes versus prior comparable period

  • Net income increased approximately 2.0%, supported by higher net interest income and noninterest income.
  • Noninterest income increased 4.6%; excluding securities gains, it increased 14.1%, primarily from higher merchant and ATM fees and gains on loans held for sale.
  • Noninterest expense increased 5.7%, driven mainly by salaries, incentive compensation, data processing and technology-related costs. FDIC insurance expense declined.
  • The net interest margin declined to 3.41% from 3.53% because of lower yields on loans and investment securities.
  • Average total assets increased substantially, while average loans and investment securities also grew. Reported net loans increased 1.3% from year-end and deposits increased 7.5%.
  • The allowance for loan losses increased to $7.966 million from $7.905 million. Q1 2012 included a $51,000 provision, compared with no provision in Q1 2011; net recoveries were $10,000 versus $6,000.
  • Comprehensive income declined to $3.953 million from $4.603 million because unrealized securities gains were lower than in the prior year.

Liquidity, debt and asset quality

  • Cash and due from banks plus interest-bearing deposits totaled $92.934 million at March 31, 2012, compared with $56.571 million at year-end.
  • Available liquidity included $79.238 million of unused FHLB borrowing capacity and $102.402 million of federal funds borrowing capacity. The company reported no outstanding federal funds balances.
  • Debt consisted primarily of $36.085 million of securities sold under repurchase agreements, $14.662 million of FHLB advances and $20.000 million of other long-term borrowings. Management stated that the company had no external debt financing on an unconsolidated holding-company basis.
  • Problem loans were 1.74% of total loans, compared with 1.70% at December 31, 2011 and 1.42% at March 31, 2011. Nonaccrual loans were $7.860 million, and loans more than 90 days past due and still accruing were $5,000.
  • Impaired loans, net of specific reserves, were $7.023 million. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $3.483 million, including $2.796 million in impaired loans.
  • Other real estate owned was $9.553 million. Management recorded $98,000 of related net expense in Q1 2012.
  • Stockholders’ equity was 12.53% of total assets, and management stated that capital levels exceeded applicable regulatory guidelines.

Guidance, outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No formal earnings guidance was provided. Management said liquidity was satisfactory and expected available sources to support existing operations for the foreseeable future.
  • Management identified rising interest rates as a risk because interest-bearing liabilities may reprice faster than longer-term earning assets, potentially compressing net interest margin.
  • Competition in central Iowa may continue to pressure loan and deposit pricing and margins. Other risks include local economic conditions, real estate values, credit losses, regulatory changes, liquidity availability and compliance costs under the Dodd-Frank Act.
  • Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities totaled $944,000 and were considered temporary. Management noted that changes in market conditions or issuer credit quality could result in future impairment.
  • On April 27, 2012, Reliance State Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities, including deposits, from Liberty Bank, F.S.B. The transaction involved a $5.4 million deposit premium. The company subsequently contributed $13.4 million of capital to Reliance State Bank in connection with the transaction.
  • The company had no material changes in off-balance-sheet arrangements, no reported legal proceedings and no disclosed risk-factor changes during the quarter.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the increase in deposits and securities investments can be sustained without further margin compression.
  • Trends in problem, impaired and nonaccrual loans, especially commercial real estate exposures and other real estate owned.
  • The adequacy of the $7.966 million loan-loss allowance if local economic or real estate conditions deteriorate.
  • The effect of the Liberty branch acquisition, $5.4 million deposit premium and $13.4 million capital contribution on future earnings, capital and liquidity.
  • The reported net interest margin, return-on-equity figures and efficiency ratio, because portions of the filing contain differing comparative figures between tables and narrative discussion.
  • The effect of rising interest rates, regulatory requirements and competitive pricing on future net interest income and liquidity.