AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. — Q1 2016 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. The company provides banking services through AuburnBank, primarily in East Alabama. This unaudited filing covers the quarter ended March 31, 2016; year-over-year comparisons are to Q1 2015, and balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2015. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless otherwise noted.

Financial performance and position

  • Earnings and revenue: Net earnings were $2.191 million, up 17.7% from $1.862 million; diluted EPS was $0.60 versus $0.51. GAAP net interest income was $5.697 million, up 3.2%; noninterest income was $0.834 million versus $1.321 million, bringing total revenue to $6.531 million versus $6.844 million.
  • Interest and margins: Tax-equivalent net interest income was $6.019 million, up 2.7%. Net interest margin was 3.12%, down 3 basis points year over year. The yield on interest-earning assets fell to 3.66% from 3.80%, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined to 0.73% from 0.84%.
  • Expenses and profitability: Noninterest expense was $4.109 million, down 4.8%; the efficiency ratio was 59.96% versus 60.09%. Return on average assets was 1.07% and return on average equity was 10.82%.
  • Loans and credit: Loans, net of unearned income, were $431.8 million, up $5.4 million from year-end and 7% higher on an average-balance basis year over year. The allowance for loan losses was $4.774 million, or 1.11% of loans, compared with $4.289 million, or 1.01%, at year-end. Nonperforming assets declined to $2.335 million from $2.966 million at year-end; nonaccrual loans were $1.938 million. Potential problem loans totaled $5.617 million.
  • Liquidity and funding: Cash and cash equivalents were $133.0 million, up $19.1 million from year-end. Operating, investing, and financing cash flows were $1.331 million, $5.275 million, and $12.451 million, respectively. Deposits were $737.4 million, up $13.7 million; noninterest-bearing deposits were $172.6 million. The Bank reported $241.1 million of available FHLB credit and $41.0 million of available federal funds lines, with none of the latter outstanding.
  • Debt and capital: Long-term debt was $7.217 million, consisting of junior subordinated debentures; the Bank had no long-term FHLB advances. Total stockholders’ equity was $82.9 million. Regulatory ratios were 10.47% Tier 1 leverage, 15.36% CET1, 16.69% Tier 1 risk-based, and 17.64% total risk-based; the company reported that it was well capitalized.
  • Dividends: The company paid $0.225 per share, totaling $0.820 million, during the quarter.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Net earnings improved despite lower total revenue. Lower interest expense, including reduced deposit costs and less high-cost wholesale funding, supported net interest income. Average loans increased 7% and average deposits increased 3% year over year.
  • Noninterest income fell $0.487 million, principally because Q1 2015 included $0.3 million of bank-owned life insurance death benefits and higher mortgage lending income. Mortgage lending income declined to $0.179 million from $0.334 million as origination volume fell.
  • The company recorded a $0.600 million negative provision (a benefit), versus no provision in Q1 2015, following a $1.2 million recovery from payoff of a nonperforming construction and land development loan. Net recoveries were $1.085 million for the quarter.
  • Noninterest expense declined partly because Q1 2015 included $0.362 million of debt prepayment penalties; salary and benefits increased $0.137 million, primarily due to routine annual increases.
  • Management expected mortgage lending volume and income to remain lower until a new loan origination system was fully operational, which it expected before the end of Q2 2016. The filing provides no formal earnings or full-year financial guidance.

Risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The loan portfolio is concentrated in East Alabama and real estate: commercial and residential real estate represented approximately 48% and 27% of loans, respectively; real-estate-secured loans were approximately 86% of the portfolio. Management also identified concentrations in residential property lessors, multifamily properties, and shopping centers.
  • Interest-rate risk, competition for quality loans, local real-estate conditions, borrower credit quality, and the subjective estimates used for loan-loss allowances and asset valuations could affect results. Management said net interest margin may face pressure from reinvestment yields, loan competition, and limited scope to reduce deposit costs further.
  • At March 31, the Bank had $46.1 million in unfunded loan commitments and $8.9 million in standby letters of credit. Management stated it had adequate liquidity for known obligations and expected requirements over the next 12 months.
  • Residential mortgage loans sold with servicing retained had an unpaid principal balance of $356.0 million; 98% were current. One $198,000 loan was repurchased during the quarter under representations and warranties; there were no pending repurchase or make-whole requests at quarter-end. Management did not consider the exposure material based on historical experience.
  • There were no material subsequent events identified, and management reported no pending or threatened legal proceedings expected to have a material adverse effect. Disclosure controls were deemed effective, with no material change in internal control over financial reporting reported.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the mortgage origination system went live as expected and whether mortgage production recovered after the reported decline.
  • Whether the Q1 loan recovery was nonrecurring and how credit quality, nonperforming assets, and the allowance develop in subsequent quarters.
  • Whether margin pressure from lower asset yields and limited further deposit-cost reductions affects future net interest income.
  • How real-estate and local-market concentrations, unfunded commitments, and mortgage repurchase claims evolve.
  • Whether reported liquidity and regulatory capital remain adequate as loans grow and market conditions change.