Biorestorative Therapies, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and period: Unaudited results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The company is developing adult stem-cell therapies, including brtxDISC for disc conditions and the pre-clinical ThermoStem program for metabolic disorders; it also has cosmetic products and research agreements. It planned to relocate corporate and laboratory operations from Florida to Melville, New York.

Financial highlights

MetricThree months ended Sept. 30, 2014Nine months ended Sept. 30, 2014Prior-year comparable
Revenue$159,930$336,246$125; $1,680
Gross profit (margin)$93,815 (58.7%)$227,705 (67.7%)$115; $1,472
Operating expenses$989,822$3,833,617$1,129,117; $3,543,933
Operating loss$(896,007)$(3,605,912)$(1,129,002); $(3,542,461)
Net loss$(1,100,454)$(4,103,269)$(1,303,008); $(4,120,201)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$(0.04)$(0.18)$(0.08); $(0.25)
Operating cash used—$(2,593,593)$(1,908,651)

At September 30, cash was $373,970, versus $201,098 at year-end 2013. Working capital deficiency was $7,006,146, improved from $7,262,748 at December 31, 2013. Total liabilities were $8,054,301 and stockholders’ deficiency was $6,458,125. Notes payable had a carrying amount of $5,794,040, including $5,171,355 current; gross debt was $5,870,558. About 77% of face-value debt was owed to one Bermuda lender. Financing activities provided $2,767,011 in the nine-month period, primarily from equity and debt issuance.

Changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Revenue rose sharply from a negligible base, mainly from two pharmaceutical research and development agreements; those agreements contributed $334,401 of nine-month revenue. The filing says two pharmaceutical clients comprised substantially all 2014 revenue.
  • Quarterly net loss narrowed by about $203,000, while nine-month net loss improved by about $17,000. Nine-month operating loss widened by about $63,000 as operating expenses increased approximately $290,000.
  • Nine-month consulting expense increased $425,851, primarily from higher non-cash stock-based compensation. Research and development expense decreased $110,498, partly due to lower University of Utah costs and reclassification of salary to cost of sales.
  • Operating cash use increased by approximately $685,000 year over year. The company raised $2,105,001 gross from common stock and warrants during the nine months and issued additional shares for services, lease concessions, and debt-related transactions.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Going concern and liquidity: Management reported substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. It expected available cash to fund operations only through December 2014 and needed additional debt or equity financing. Without financing or creditor extensions/conversions, it could curtail development and marketing, or discontinue operations and liquidate.
  • Debt maturities: As of the filing date, $344,063 of notes were past due or payable on demand. The company was negotiating extensions or conversions. Subsequent to quarter-end it reported $50,000 of equity financing, $75,000 of debt financing, $89,063 of R&D receipts, repayment of $139,063 of debt, and extension of $392,685 of debt. A mandatory $89,063 debt prepayment triggered by an R&D receipt remained unpaid as of the filing date.
  • Business spending: Management expected research and development, marketing, and general and administrative costs to increase as programs continue and infrastructure expands. The filing provides no quantified revenue or earnings guidance.
  • Research agreements: A Japanese agreement runs for one year and provides up to $250,000; a U.S. brown-fat agreement runs for two years and provides up to $775,000. Payments are partly milestone-based, and revenue is recognized over the agreement terms, subject to deliverables.
  • Unusual items: Nine-month other expense included $381,602 of debt-discount amortization, a $49,094 loss on debt extinguishment and $30,128 warrant-modification expense, partly offset by a $183,768 gain on settlements, including a $166,668 University of Utah agreement gain.
  • Contingency: A former consultant sued over an alleged 2009 loan and agreement, seeking at least approximately $193,000 and warrants for 80,000 shares. The company denied the allegations, intends to defend the case, and recorded no accrual, stating it believes the claims lack merit.
  • Share-based compensation and dilution: Shares outstanding were 31,018,928 at September 30 and 31,457,869 as of November 11. At September 30, 8,784,000 options and 7,408,683 warrants were outstanding, in addition to convertible notes; these securities were excluded from diluted loss per share as anti-dilutive. Subsequent option grants and plan expansion were also disclosed.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were effective at quarter-end and reported no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether additional financing was secured after the filing and whether the company maintained operations beyond its stated December 2014 cash runway.
  • Current status, maturity terms, extensions, repayments, and any defaults relating to the Bermuda lender and other notes, including the unpaid mandatory prepayment.
  • Milestone achievement, termination provisions, collections, and revenue concentration under the two pharmaceutical agreements.
  • Progress and costs for the Melville laboratory relocation and brtxDISC and ThermoStem development programs.
  • Resolution and potential financial exposure of the former consultant lawsuit, and the effect of ongoing share, warrant, and option issuance on dilution.