CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Capital City Bank Group, Inc. — Q3 2011 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Unaudited consolidated results. The company provides banking and related services through 70 offices in Florida, Georgia and Alabama.

Financial performance and position

  • Earnings: Q3 net income was $2.0 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, versus $0.4 million, or $0.02, in Q3 2010; it was $2.1 million in Q2 2011. Nine-month net income was $5.4 million ($0.32 per diluted share), compared with a $2.3 million loss in 2010.
  • Revenue and margins: Q3 net interest income was $23.1 million (tax-equivalent, $23.3 million), down from $25.1 million tax-equivalent in Q3 2010. Nine-month tax-equivalent net interest income was $70.3 million versus $74.3 million. Net interest margin was 4.20% in Q3 (4.38% a year earlier) and 4.18% for nine months (4.29% in 2010). Noninterest income was $14.2 million for Q3 and $45.0 million for nine months; noninterest expense was $30.6 million and $95.1 million, respectively. The reported operating efficiency ratio, a non-GAAP measure, was 81.40% for Q3 and 82.07% for nine months.
  • Credit costs and asset quality: Q3 loan-loss provision was $3.7 million, and nine-month provision was $11.4 million, down from $5.7 million and $20.0 million in the comparable 2010 periods. Nine-month net charge-offs were $17.2 million versus $26.3 million. At September 30, the allowance was $29.7 million, 1.79% of loans and 36% of nonperforming loans. Nonperforming assets were $143.0 million, or 5.67% of assets; nonperforming loans were $81.8 million. Troubled debt restructurings rose to $28.4 million from $21.6 million at year-end 2010.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Total assets were $2.524 billion, down from $2.622 billion at December 31, 2010. Loans, net of allowance, were $1.628 billion; deposits were $2.044 billion. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $246.4 million. Management reported $739.8 million of additional liquidity available through its funding resources.
  • Debt and capital: Short-term borrowings were $47.5 million, subordinated notes $62.9 million, and other long-term borrowings $45.4 million. Total shareowners’ equity was $260.9 million. The company reported a 15.41% total risk-based capital ratio, 10.20% leverage ratio and 7.19% tangible common equity ratio, and described itself as well-capitalized.
  • Cash flow: For the first nine months, operating activities provided $70.2 million and investing activities provided $54.8 million; financing activities used $114.7 million. Cash and cash equivalents increased $10.2 million to $246.4 million.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Nine-month earnings improved from a loss to profit, primarily reflecting lower loan-loss provision and operating expenses. The 2011 period also included a $2.6 million net pretax gain from selling Visa Class B shares, after a related swap liability.
  • Loans contracted amid weak demand, charge-offs and transfers to foreclosed real estate. Nonaccrual loans declined, while restructured loans increased; OREO was $61.2 million at quarter-end.
  • Deposit interest costs fell as the company reduced rates and shifted toward lower-cost non-maturity and noninterest-bearing deposits. Deposits overall declined from year-end.
  • Goodwill was $84.8 million. An interim impairment test found the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeded estimated fair value at step one, but step two indicated goodwill was not impaired.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • No quantified earnings or revenue guidance was provided. Management expected approximately $4.0 million of capital expenditures over the next 12 months, primarily for facilities, equipment and technology.
  • Management cited pressure on net interest income from falling loan balances, weak loan demand, low rates and asset repricing. It planned to maintain lending standards rather than relax underwriting to pursue loan growth.
  • Credit and concentration risks remain significant: approximately 78% of lending operations were in Florida, and about 80% of loans had real estate as a primary, secondary or tertiary collateral component. Management identified weak regional conditions and depressed property values as risks to borrowers, collateral and earnings.
  • Dividend payments require regulatory approval; the Bank may not receive approval. Federal Reserve restrictions also apply to new or refinanced debt and interest payments on trust preferred securities. The filing warns that dividends could be reduced or eliminated.
  • Off-balance-sheet exposures included $316.7 million of commitments to extend credit and $12.1 million of standby letters of credit; amounts drawn may be lower. Management said pending ordinary-course litigation was not expected to have a material effect.
  • Interest-rate simulations were within policy limits; the largest stated net-interest-income sensitivity was a 5.2% decline under a 300-basis-point rate increase. Management cautioned that model assumptions may differ from actual behavior.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether lower nonperforming loans and charge-offs represent durable improvement, given rising TDR balances, $61.2 million of OREO and allowance coverage of 36% of nonperforming loans.
  • How much of nine-month profitability depended on the one-time Visa gain and reduced credit costs, versus recurring operating performance.
  • Whether loan contraction and margin pressure continue, and whether the shift to lower-cost deposits can offset weaker asset yields.
  • Regulatory status of dividend approvals and restrictions on debt and trust-preferred interest payments.
  • The filing contains inconsistent investment-security unrealized-loss figures in different sections; verify the reported amount against the original statements and notes.