DYADIC INTERNATIONAL INC annual report, FY2020

Dyadic International, Inc. — 2020 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. This is an annual report, not a quarterly filing; the provided filing text does not give separate fourth-quarter results. Dyadic is a development-stage biotechnology platform company focused on adapting its C1 fungal expression technology for human and animal biopharmaceutical applications. It had no pharmaceutical products approved for sale; revenue came from research collaborations and grants.

Financial performance and position

Metric20202019
Revenue$1.60 million$1.68 million
Cost of research revenue$1.42 million$1.46 million
Provision for contract losses$187,000None
Research and development expense$3.87 million$3.09 million
General and administrative expense$6.08 million$5.52 million
Operating loss$10.03 million$9.28 million
Net loss$9.33 million$8.31 million
Basic and diluted loss per share$0.34$0.31
Cash used in operating activities$6.57 million$5.78 million
  • Revenue declined about 4.7%, while net loss increased about 12.2%. Research spending rose primarily due to COVID-19-related and other internal projects. G&A increased, including higher share-based compensation, insurance, legal and business-development costs.
  • Revenue less research-revenue costs was approximately $177,000, or 11.1% of revenue, before the contract-loss provision; after that provision, the contribution was approximately negative $10,000. These are calculated from reported figures.
  • At year-end, cash and cash equivalents were $20.64 million and short-term investments were $8.46 million; total current assets were $29.78 million. Cash plus short- and long-term investment securities was approximately $29.09 million, versus $35.73 million at year-end 2019.
  • Current liabilities were $1.63 million and stockholders’ equity was $28.45 million. The balance sheet lists no debt; the filing text does not provide a separate debt balance. Management said existing cash, cash equivalents and investments were expected to fund operations for at least the next 12 months.
  • Investing activities provided $22.12 million, principally from net maturities of investment securities; financing activities provided $255,000, mainly from option exercises. The company reported an accumulated deficit of $50.68 million.

Business developments, outlook and risks

  • Dyadic reported 14 ongoing research collaborations in 2020, compared with 10 in 2019, but revenue was slightly lower because projects were smaller on average. One collaboration led to the $187,000 contract-loss provision. One CRO represented 91.6% of research services purchased, a notable supplier concentration.
  • Management described C1 productivity, protein expression and animal-study results as promising, but commercialization remains unproven. The company reported no C1-produced product in clinical trials at year-end. It planned toxicology work for its DYAI-100 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate in 2021 and anticipated a Phase 1 trial in the second half of 2021; these were forward-looking expectations, not completed milestones.
  • In 2020, Dyadic expanded C1 research collaborations and received an Alphazyme equity interest in connection with a sublicense; its ownership was diluted from 2.50% to 1.99%. A potential Novovet animal-health sublicense had not advanced because Novovet lacked required funding, and Dyadic said it intended to terminate the agreement in 2021 if funding was not raised.
  • The VTT research contract runs through June 2022 and includes payments for platform development and glycoengineering, with further expanded commitments. Total purchase obligations at year-end were $3.23 million, primarily for CRO services. Dyadic may fund some or all of a Phase 1 trial itself.
  • Key risks include ongoing losses and dependence on external research funding and collaborations; clinical, safety, regulatory and adoption uncertainty; competition from better-resourced companies; reliance on CROs and a concentrated research-services provider; intellectual-property risks; and potential research disruption from COVID-19. Management said the pandemic’s financial and operational effects could not yet be estimated reliably.
  • The company had an at-the-market offering authorization of up to $50 million, but reported no sales under it and no immediate plan to use it for its near-term business plan. Management’s 12-month liquidity statement is not a guarantee that funding will remain sufficient if spending, clinical development or collaboration receipts change.
  • The independent auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and reported no critical audit matters. Management concluded disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were effective; the auditor did not attest to internal-control effectiveness.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Current cash, investment balances and operating cash burn, including whether the stated 12-month runway remains adequate as clinical and research spending evolves.
  2. Whether DYAI-100 toxicology and Phase 1 plans progressed on schedule, and the resulting safety, efficacy and regulatory data.
  3. How many collaborations remain funded, their revenue contribution and terms, and whether any sublicense milestones or royalties have actually been earned.
  4. Whether C1’s reported productivity and glycoengineering results translate into reproducible quality, safety, scale-up and cost advantages acceptable to regulators and commercial partners.
  5. Exposure to the principal CRO and other research-service commitments, including the $3.23 million purchase-obligation schedule.
  6. Potential share dilution from the $50 million ATM program, outstanding options and future equity financing needs.