ERIE INDEMNITY CO quarterly report, Q3 FY2020

Erie Indemnity Company — Q3 2020 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. Amounts are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are generally in millions unless noted. Erie Indemnity acts as attorney-in-fact and service provider for Erie Insurance Exchange, its sole customer. Its principal earnings source is a management fee based on Exchange premiums.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2020Q3 20199M 20209M 2019
Operating revenue$653.5$638.7$1,927.2$1,880.6
Operating income$96.2$105.9$273.1$288.6
Net income$89.2$94.2$230.5$257.2
Diluted Class A EPS$1.71$1.80$4.41$4.92
Total investment income$16.4$13.6$18.8$33.1
  • Q3 operating revenue rose 2.3%, but operating income fell 9.1% and net income fell 5.3%. Nine-month operating revenue increased 2.5%, while operating income declined 5.4% and net income declined 10.4%.
  • Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by total operating revenue, was approximately 14.7% in Q3 2020 versus 16.6% in Q3 2019; for nine months it was 14.2% versus 15.3%.
  • Policy issuance and renewal management fee revenue increased 2.1% in Q3 and 1.9% year to date. Exchange direct and affiliated assumed premiums written increased 2.0% to $2.0 billion in Q3 and 1.9% to $5.8 billion year to date. The stated management fee rate was 25% overall; revenue is allocated between policy and administrative services.
  • Policy issuance and renewal costs rose 5.0% in Q3 and 3.6% year to date, outpacing related revenue growth. The filing cites higher commissions, agent incentives, personnel costs, technology spending and other expenses. Administrative-service reimbursements are recorded gross with matching costs and do not affect operating income.
  • Q3 investment income increased 20.8%, mainly from realized gains; nine-month investment income decreased 43.1%, reflecting weaker limited partnership results, lower realized gains and net investment income, and higher impairment losses. Nine-month impairment losses recognized in earnings were $3.2 million versus $0.2 million in 2019.

Cash flow, balance sheet and liquidity

  • For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $234.5 million versus $237.9 million. Investing cash outflow was $218.6 million versus $32.2 million, largely due to investment purchases; financing cash outflow was $136.3 million versus $127.2 million, primarily reflecting dividends. Cash and equivalents declined by $120.4 million to $216.4 million.
  • At September 30, total assets were $2.16 billion, total liabilities $912.1 million and shareholders’ equity $1.25 billion. Current assets were $792.9 million and current liabilities $606.5 million.
  • Balance-sheet borrowings totaled approximately $96.4 million, including current and long-term amounts. The $100 million revolving credit facility had no borrowings; $99.1 million remained available after letters of credit. The term loan carries a fixed 4.35% rate and is amortized over 28 years. The company reported compliance with debt covenants.
  • Management cited $216.4 million of cash, the revolving facility and approximately $644.8 million of unpledged investment assets as sources of liquidity. Investments with fair value of $124.6 million were pledged for the revolving line and $126.2 million for the term loan.
  • Quarterly Class A dividends declared were $0.965 per share, up from $0.90 a year earlier; nine-month dividends paid totaled $134.8 million. No shares were repurchased under the public repurchase program during the first nine months, and $17.8 million of authorization remained.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • COVID-19-related financial market volatility weighed on investments in Q1; markets substantially recovered in Q2 and Q3. The company reported no significant business-process interruption, with more than 90% of its workforce working remotely.
  • Exchange new-business premiums grew 10.4% in Q3, while total policies in force grew 1.7% year over year. Previously announced auto rate reductions are expected to constrain premiums and management fees: through Q3 they reduced Exchange premiums by an estimated $41 million and Indemnity fees by $10 million; the filing estimated further Q4 reductions of $49 million and $12 million, respectively, with remaining effects extending into 2021.
  • Management said the pandemic’s duration and financial impact remain uncertain. Risks include constrained premium growth, recession and policy cancellations, agent and technology costs, investment volatility and impairment, cybersecurity and business-continuity risks, and possible changes in claims, regulation or consumer behavior. No formal earnings or revenue guidance is provided.
  • The Exchange is the company’s sole customer and a major source of revenue and receivables: net receivables from the Exchange and affiliates were $501.2 million. The Exchange’s A.M. Best financial strength rating was A+ with a stable outlook, affirmed July 8, 2020; its statutory policyholders’ surplus was $10.0 billion at September 30, 2020.
  • A long-running lawsuit alleges Indemnity improperly retained policy installment, late and reinstatement charges, with plaintiffs citing approximately $308 million in alleged charges. Related federal litigation was dismissed and affirmed on appeal; the state-court Sullivan matter remained pending. The company said it has meritorious defenses and does not expect its litigation accruals to be material, but outcomes remain uncertain.
  • Effective January 1, 2020, the company adopted the current expected credit loss standard, recording a $1.1 million after-tax reduction to opening retained earnings. Management said adoption had no material impact on the financial statements.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether Exchange premium growth, policy retention and new-business trends can offset the announced rate reductions and pandemic-related economic pressures.
  • Whether operating expenses—especially agent incentives, compensation and technology—continue to grow faster than policy-related revenue.
  • How investment income, impairment charges and portfolio valuations evolve amid market and interest-rate volatility, including the increase in Level 3 securities.
  • Whether liquidity remains adequate if cash generation weakens or investment assets become harder to sell, and whether debt covenants continue to be met.
  • Developments in the Sullivan lawsuit and any material changes in litigation exposure, COVID-19 impacts or Exchange credit quality.