HOME BANCORP, INC. annual report, FY2015

Home Bancorp, Inc. — 2015 Form 10-K

Business context and reporting period. Home Bancorp is a Louisiana bank holding company operating Home Bank, N.A., with 30 offices in south Louisiana and west Mississippi. The filing reports the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015; comparisons are primarily with 2014. The Bank converted to a national bank charter in March 2015. Results include Louisiana Bancorp, acquired September 15, 2015, for approximately three and a half months.

Financial performance and condition

Metric20152014Change / context
Total assets$1.552 billion$1.221 billionUp 27.1%, principally from the acquisition
Loans, net of allowance$1.215 billion$901.2 millionGross loans up 34.7%; $281.6 million acquired and $92.5 million originated growth
Deposits$1.244 billion$993.6 millionUp 25.2%; acquisition added $208.7 million
Interest income / expense$58.4 million / $3.9 million$54.3 million / $3.3 millionIncome up 7.5%; expense up 17.7%
Net interest income$54.5 million$51.0 millionUp 6.9%
Net interest margin / spread4.43% / 4.32%4.54% / 4.45%Both narrowed
Provision for loan losses$2.1 million$2.4 millionDown 12.4%
Noninterest income / expense$8.8 million / $42.0 million$8.2 million / $41.8 millionIncome up 7.3%; expense up 0.6% reported
Income before tax / net income$19.2 million / $12.5 million$15.1 million / $9.9 millionNet income up 27.1%
Diluted EPS$1.79$1.42Up 26.1%
Operating cash flow$36.2 million$27.9 millionInvesting cash use was $61.9 million; financing provided $21.5 million; cash and equivalents declined $4.3 million
  • Profitability and costs: The efficiency ratio improved to 66.37% from 70.54%. Excluding merger expenses, noninterest expense increased 2.9%; merger-related costs were $1.4 million in 2015 versus $2.3 million in 2014.
  • Credit quality: Net charge-offs fell to $283,000 (0.02% of loans) from $1.5 million (0.17%). Total nonperforming loans were $12.8 million, or 1.05% of loans, compared with $23.3 million, or 2.56%, in 2014. Nonperforming assets were $15.9 million, or 1.03% of assets. The allowance was $9.5 million, 0.78% of total loans; excluding acquired loans, the coverage ratio was 1.15%.
  • Funding and liquidity: FHLB advances totaled $125.2 million, up from $47.5 million; $480.7 million of additional FHLB capacity was available. Cash and cash equivalents were $24.8 million and available-for-sale securities were $176.8 million. Certificates of deposit totaling $164.5 million mature within 12 months; management expected most to renew.
  • Capital: The Bank was categorized as well capitalized. At year-end, common equity Tier 1 and Tier 1 risk-based capital were each 11.61%, total risk-based capital was 12.43%, and Tier 1 leverage was 8.74%. Company shareholders’ equity was $165.0 million.

Material changes versus 2014

  • The Louisiana Bancorp acquisition added $351.1 million of assets, including $281.6 million of loans, and $291.3 million of liabilities, including $208.7 million of deposits and $76.0 million of FHLB advances. The cash purchase price was $70.0 million; the Company recorded $10.2 million of goodwill. One acquired office was closed or consolidated in January 2016.
  • Loan growth also reflected originations, led by construction and land, commercial and industrial, and one-to-four-family mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans were $405.4 million; construction and land loans were $116.8 million, or 9.5% of loans.
  • Core deposits, excluding the acquired balances, rose $76.5 million (9.9%); certificates of deposit excluding acquired balances declined $34.5 million (15.6%).
  • Net interest margin declined 11 basis points, while average interest-earning assets grew. The company declared $0.30 per share in dividends, compared with $0.07 in 2014, and repurchased $3.5 million of its shares during 2015.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or growth guidance and states there were no agreements or understandings regarding a future acquisition. Management said it expected sufficient liquidity to meet requirements.
  • Management’s interest-rate model estimated projected net interest income changes of 0.0% for a +100 basis-point shift, down 0.1% for +200 basis points, and down 0.5% for +300 basis points. Actual results may differ with balance-sheet growth, repricing timing, and market conditions.
  • Management highlighted low oil and gas prices as a regional economic risk. Energy-sector loans were $35.4 million (2.9% of loans), with a further $8.9 million in unfunded commitments. A prolonged downturn could increase defaults, provisions, and collection costs.
  • Other principal risks include commercial real estate and construction lending exposure, interest-rate and competitive pressure, acquisition integration and valuation, regulatory changes, natural disasters in the region, cybersecurity and operational failures, and potential securities impairment. Management reported no securities impairment deemed other-than-temporary at year-end.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments totaled $294.5 million, including $89.7 million of loan-originating commitments, $127.4 million of available lines, $73.7 million of undisbursed loans in process, and $3.8 million of standby letters of credit. Management anticipated no material losses from these commitments.
  • Management, after consulting counsel, did not expect ordinary-course legal matters to materially affect the Company. The independent auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and concluded internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of reported growth and earnings is attributable to the Louisiana Bancorp acquisition versus ongoing organic performance, including integration costs and realized cost savings.
  • Whether asset quality remains sound as acquired loans are integrated and commercial real estate, construction, and commercial lending expand; assess allowance adequacy, criticized loans, and energy-sector borrower trends.
  • Whether core deposit growth persists and the $164.5 million of near-term certificate maturities renews on acceptable terms; monitor FHLB borrowing growth and associated funding costs.
  • Whether net interest margin pressure continues as rates and deposit costs change, compared with the filing’s modeled interest-rate sensitivities.
  • How future capital requirements, including the phased-in capital conservation buffer, affect dividends, repurchases, and growth capacity.