KURA SUSHI USA, INC. quarterly report, Q1 FY2020

Kura Sushi USA, Inc. — Q1 FY2020 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended November 30, 2019. Unaudited results; amounts below are in U.S. dollars. Kura Sushi operates a technology-enabled Japanese restaurant concept. It had 23 restaurants in five states at quarter-end.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 FY2020Q1 FY2019
Sales$17.4 million$13.4 million
Operating loss$1.4 million$0.4 million
Net loss$1.2 million; $0.15 per share$0.4 million; $0.08 per share
Net cash from operating activities$(1.5) million$1.4 million
Capital expenditures and other investing cash flow$(3.2) million$(2.6) million
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter-end$33.0 million$4.0 million

Sales rose 30.0%, driven by four restaurants opened after the comparable prior-year period and 7.9% comparable restaurant sales growth, versus 4.4% a year earlier. No restaurants opened during the quarter. One location opened in Katy, Texas after quarter-end.

Restaurant operating costs were 88.7% of sales, compared with 87.0%; operating margin was negative 7.9%, compared with negative 3.2%. Food and beverage costs improved to 32.6% of sales from 33.7%, while labor rose to 32.3% from 30.8% and occupancy to 8.3% from 6.9%. Management attributed cost changes to food prices and menu pricing, wage increases, and the higher costs and occupancy of newer restaurants. General and administrative expenses increased 54.8% to $3.3 million, including $0.9 million of public-company costs.

Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was a loss of $143,000, compared with income of $501,000; adjusted EBITDA margin was negative 0.8% versus 3.7%. Restaurant-level Contribution margin, also non-GAAP, was 17.5% versus 18.7%.

Financial position and liquidity

Cash declined $5.0 million during the quarter. Operating cash outflow included payments that reduced accounts payable by $1.0 million and accrued expenses by $0.6 million. Property and equipment purchases were $3.2 million. Current assets were $36.0 million and current liabilities $10.7 million at November 30, 2019.

The company had no borrowings under its $5 million credit facility and reported compliance with its financial covenants. The facility matures July 31, 2020, is secured by substantially all company assets, and includes liquidity, fixed-charge-coverage, and tangible-net-worth covenants. Finance lease liabilities totaled $3.2 million. Operating lease liabilities totaled $45.5 million; the filing also identifies $17.8 million of leases for restaurants not yet in possession.

Outlook, accounting, and risks

  • Management expected to open six restaurants in fiscal 2020, with corresponding increases in sales and restaurant operating costs. It expected public-company expenses to increase general and administrative costs as a share of sales.
  • Management said cash on hand, operating cash flows, and credit-facility availability were expected to fund lease obligations, capital expenditures, and working capital needs for at least 12 months.
  • The company adopted lease accounting standard ASC 842 on September 1, 2019. Adoption added operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities to the balance sheet and had an immaterial impact on operations, equity, and cash flows; prior-period figures were not restated.
  • A former employee’s putative California wage-and-hour class action remained pending. The company disputes the allegations and said it could not estimate possible losses. Management did not believe the case or other ordinary-course claims would have a material adverse effect, but acknowledged successful claims could affect results.
  • Risks discussed include food and commodity price increases, wage and other labor-cost inflation, and the possibility that competition or economic conditions limit menu-price increases or affect customer traffic and spending. Management said there were no material changes to previously reported risk factors.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether planned fiscal 2020 openings occur as expected and generate sales and returns sufficient to offset their labor, occupancy, and build-out costs.
  • Comparable-sales trends and restaurant-level margins, particularly as labor and occupancy costs rose as a percentage of sales.
  • Cash burn, planned capital spending, and liquidity relative to lease commitments and the credit facility’s July 2020 maturity and covenants.
  • Any developments in the wage-and-hour class action, for which the company could not estimate a loss range.
  • The effects of long-term operating leases, including the $17.8 million of leases for locations not yet in possession.