MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2015

Business Context and Reporting Period

This is Marathon Patent Group, Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015. The filing identifies the registrant as Marathon Patent Group, Inc.; this differs from the request metadata’s company name, MARA Holdings, Inc. The business acquired patent rights and sought to monetize them through licensing and enforcement. At quarter-end, it reported 369 U.S. and foreign patents and patent rights, plus ten patent applications.

Financial Results and Liquidity

MetricQ3 2015Q3 2014Nine months 2015Nine months 2014
Revenue$6.41 million$13.46 million$11.87 million$20.06 million
Operating income (loss)$(3.09) million$2.06 million$(17.95) million$1.46 million
Net income (loss)$(3.75) million$3.52 million$(13.03) million$2.92 million
Basic loss per share$(0.26)$0.31 income$(0.92)$0.15 income

Revenue less cost of revenue, before patent amortization and other operating expenses, was approximately $2.41 million (37.6% of revenue) in Q3 2015 versus $7.87 million (58.5%) in Q3 2014; for the nine months it was approximately negative $0.32 million (negative 2.7%) versus $11.61 million (57.9%). These are derived figures.

  • Cash flow: Operating activities used $2.92 million in the first nine months of 2015, compared with $3.23 million provided in the prior-year period. Investing activities used $0.02 million; financing activities provided $1.27 million. Cash declined to $3.41 million from $5.08 million at December 31, 2014.
  • Liquidity: Working capital was negative $21.06 million at September 30, versus negative $14.26 million at year-end 2014. Management said it was uncertain that existing cash and receivables would fund operations for the next 12 months and might need additional capital or strategic alternatives.
  • Debt and obligations: Notes payable, net of discounts, totaled approximately $33.26 million ($19.38 million current and $13.88 million long-term). Total liabilities were $50.91 million. The Fortress senior secured notes carried interest at LIBOR plus 9.75%, with 2.75% paid in kind; the notes were secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all company assets, subject to stated exceptions. The company also had a $1.00 million revenue-sharing liability and a $6.55 million Clouding IP earn-out liability.
  • Other balance-sheet items: Accounts receivable rose to $2.33 million from $0.22 million. Net intangible assets were $43.75 million; stockholders’ equity was $15.67 million, down from $24.25 million at year-end.

Material Changes Versus the Prior Comparable Period

  • Revenue fell 52% year over year in Q3 and 41% for the first nine months, primarily due to fewer one-time patent licenses. Operating results shifted from income to losses in both comparisons.
  • Patent amortization increased to $8.51 million for the nine months, from $2.87 million, reflecting portfolios added in late 2014 and 2015. Enforcement costs also increased, including expert costs and litigation counsel fees for current and upcoming trials.
  • Interest expense for the first nine months was $3.59 million, compared with negligible expense in 2014. The period also included a $0.65 million debt-extinguishment loss and a $0.77 million patent impairment charge. A $2.90 million gain from remeasuring the Clouding earn-out partly offset expenses.
  • Five licenses generated 87% of Q3 2015 revenue; one-time licenses accounted for approximately 97% of quarterly revenue and 94% of nine-month revenue. The company said revenue may remain highly variable and concentrated among a small number of licensees.

Outlook, Risks, Contingencies, and Unusual Items

  • The Fortress agreement required at least $15 million of monetization revenue over four specified fiscal quarters and minimum unrestricted cash of $1 million. The filing reported $5.46 million of revenue over the first two quarters of the covenant period—less than half the amount required for the full period—and disclosed the shortfall as a risk.
  • The company had entered a business combination agreement with Uniloc and Marathon Group SA. Closing was expected in Q1 2016, subject to shareholder approvals, third-party consents, listing and other conditions; the transaction was not completed as of this filing.
  • Subsequent to quarter-end, the company and Bridgestone terminated the patent purchase agreement. The filing said the patents’ book value and the associated $10 million debt would be removed from the balance sheet. The company also agreed to settle Dominion Harbor litigation for $250,000 cash and 300,000 restricted shares.
  • Patent enforcement and licensing outcomes, trial costs, revenue concentration and timing, ability to obtain financing, debt covenants, patent useful-life and impairment estimates, and the realization of deferred tax assets are material risks. The company reported a $6.30 million income tax benefit for the nine months despite its net loss.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were ineffective as of September 30, 2015, citing a limited internal audit function. It said it was developing improvements but could not assure timely or adequate implementation.
  • The filing’s non-GAAP reconciliation contains apparent conflicting figures: narrative text gives Q3 and nine-month 2015 non-GAAP losses of $1.89 million and $8.30 million, while the table gives $0.09 million and $6.50 million. The filing text does not provide a clear reconciliation of this discrepancy.

Important Facts for Investors to Verify

  • Confirm the issuer’s identity: this filing is for Marathon Patent Group, Inc., not MARA Holdings, Inc.
  • Review the Fortress covenant calculation, revenue definition, compliance status and consequences of any shortfall, alongside cash needs and financing availability.
  • Verify the non-GAAP reconciliation discrepancy and the underlying reported and adjusted results.
  • Assess the status and economics of the Uniloc transaction, the post-quarter Bridgestone termination, and the Dominion settlement, including share dilution and cash commitments.
  • Evaluate the concentration and repeatability of licensing revenue, pending enforcement matters and trial-related spending, and the assumptions supporting patent values and deferred tax assets.