MID PENN BANCORP INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. — Q3 2013 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period

Mid Penn Bancorp is a Pennsylvania-based bank holding company. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2012. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless otherwise noted.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2013Q3 2012Nine months 2013Nine months 2012
Net interest income$6.441$5.770$17.747$17.470
Provision for loan losses$0.575$0.150$1.485$0.675
Noninterest income$0.808$1.057$2.496$2.726
Noninterest expense$4.746$5.082$14.395$14.767
Net income$1.488$1.266$3.539$3.760
Net income available to common shareholders$1.400$1.138$3.303$3.375
Basic and diluted EPS$0.40$0.33$0.95$0.97
  • Q3 taxable-equivalent net interest margin rose to 4.08% from 3.60%; nine-month margin rose to 3.79% from 3.65%. Annualized Q3 ROA/ROE were 0.85%/11.37%; nine-month figures were 0.68%/9.00%.
  • At September 30, total assets were $697.988, net loans $522.753, deposits $620.854, total liabilities $645.435, and shareholders’ equity $52.553. Allowance for loan and lease losses was $5.793, or 1.10% of loans.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $13.217. Nine-month operating cash flow was $9.982, investing cash use $2.090, and financing cash use $10.148; cash declined $2.256 from year-end.
  • Short-term borrowings were $9.245 and long-term debt $8.190, compared with no short-term borrowings and $22.510 long-term debt at year-end 2012. The company repaid $14.320 of long-term debt and recorded $9.245 of new short-term borrowings during the nine months.
  • Regulatory capital at September 30: bank Tier 1 leverage 7.5%, Tier 1 risk-based 10.0%, and total risk-based capital 11.1%. The bank exceeded the filing’s stated “well-capitalized” thresholds.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 net income available to common shareholders increased 23.0%, while the nine-month amount declined 2.1%. Q3 net interest income rose 11.6%; nine-month net interest income rose 1.6%.
  • Management attributed stronger net interest income to lower funding costs and shifting earning assets toward loans. Average loans grew 7.6% year over year in Q3; funding costs declined 29.4% as presented in management’s analysis.
  • Loans increased $44.326, or 9.2%, from year-end, while deposits decreased $4.607. Available-for-sale securities fell $34.525 and interest-bearing time deposits at other institutions fell $15.702.
  • Credit-loss provisions increased sharply year over year. Nine-month net charge-offs were $1.201 versus $1.008; nonperforming loans declined to $11.742 (2.22% of loans) from $12.257 (2.53%) at year-end, but foreclosed real estate rose to $2.047 from $0.843.
  • Accumulated other comprehensive income moved from positive $2.293 at year-end to a loss of $0.433, primarily reflecting a $2.591 after-tax unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities in the first nine months.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • The filing gives no specific earnings or financial guidance. Management says interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
  • Management reported stable liquidity above its internal minimums and identified core deposits, security maturities/sales, loan repayments, correspondent lines and FHLB borrowing capacity as liquidity sources.
  • Key risks include borrower repayment capacity and collateral values, concentration in commercial real estate, interest-rate changes, competition, economic weakness, regulatory changes (including Basel III), and uncertainty in allowance and asset valuations. Management said it was assessing Basel III’s impact.
  • Nonperforming assets totaled $13.789, or 2.60% of loans plus foreclosed real estate. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $8.567; $7.710 was nonaccrual. The filing reported no defaults on TDRs under forbearance agreements.
  • FDIC assessment expense fell substantially, including a $0.139 refund of prior overbillings. A gain on sale/write-down of foreclosed assets was recorded, and management cited property sales above prior appraisals as a factor.
  • The company had completed repayment of its Treasury Series A preferred stock in December 2012 and repurchased/cancelled its Treasury warrants in January 2013; it reported no remaining CPP obligations. It had $5.000 of Series B preferred stock outstanding, with a 7% noncumulative dividend.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls, no material changes in internal control during the quarter, and no known litigation expected to have a material adverse effect. It reported no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth—particularly commercial real estate and commercial lending—continues without deterioration in credit quality, and whether the higher provision adequately covers potential losses.
  • The composition and performance of nonperforming loans, TDRs, foreclosed assets, and the collateral assumptions underlying the allowance.
  • Whether deposit mix and funding costs remain supportive of net interest margin as time deposits run off and short-term borrowing increases.
  • The effect of securities valuation changes and accumulated OCI losses on capital, and the company’s assessment of Basel III requirements.
  • Whether Q3 improvements in earnings and margin persist despite lower fee income and weaker nine-month common earnings per share.