NEOGENOMICS INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2017

NeoGenomics, Inc. — Q1 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2017. The unaudited consolidated statements are prepared under U.S. GAAP. NeoGenomics operates cancer-focused clinical diagnostic laboratories and provides testing and clinical-trial services to pharmaceutical companies.

Financial results

MetricQ1 2017Q1 2016Change
Revenue$61.7 million$59.7 million+3%
Clinical testing revenue$56.7 million$54.6 million+4%
Pharma Services revenue$5.0 million$5.1 million-2%
Gross profit / margin$27.2 million / 44.1%$27.2 million / 45.5%Margin down 1.4 percentage points
Operating income (loss)$(0.1) million$1.9 millionDown $2.0 million
Net income (loss)$(0.7) million$0.2 millionDeclined
Net loss attributable to common stockholders$(3.2) million$(5.4) millionLoss narrowed
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$7.1 million$8.2 millionDown $1.2 million
Operating cash flow$(1.7) million$7.1 millionDown $8.7 million

Clinical testing volumes increased 15.3%, while clinical testing revenue rose 4.5% on the company’s detailed clinical metrics. Average revenue per test fell 9.4%, primarily due to growth in lower-priced PD-L1 testing and a 19% Medicare Physician Fee Schedule reduction for certain flow cytometry codes. Average cost per test also fell 9.7%; overall gross margin nevertheless contracted.

Balance sheet, debt and liquidity

  • At March 31, 2017, cash was $11.0 million, current assets were $84.6 million and current liabilities were $39.9 million. Reported working capital was $44.7 million.
  • Net accounts receivable was $61.7 million, up from $55.5 million at year-end 2016; gross receivables increased to $76.4 million from $69.2 million. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $14.6 million, or 19.2% of gross receivables.
  • Total debt, including capital leases and loans, was $113.1 million gross; the reported long-term debt balance, net of issuance costs and current portion, was $102.2 million. Revolver borrowings were approximately $27.9 million gross, up from $22.9 million at year-end.
  • The $75 million revolving facility had approximately $19 million available at quarter-end, subject to borrowing capacity based on adjusted EBITDA. The company reported compliance with its debt covenants.
  • Management said cash, available credit and expected operating cash flows should cover operating commitments and interest for at least the next 12 months. Q1 investing cash outflow was $3.0 million, mainly for equipment and facility improvements; financing cash inflow was $3.2 million.

Changes, outlook and other important items

  • Operating cash flow turned negative, principally reflecting higher receivables and billing delays following integration of Clarient’s billing operations. Management said the unbilled-claims backlog had returned to a normal level after quarter-end; delayed billing had not yet converted to cash by March 31.
  • Management attributed higher general and administrative expense, up $2.8 million to $20.8 million, partly to payroll, depreciation, stock compensation and bad debt. Bad debt expense was approximately 6.1% of revenue versus 4.5% a year earlier; management expected it to decline in the second half of 2017 as billing integration progressed.
  • The company completed consolidation of its Irvine laboratory into its Aliso Viejo facility in March. Related overtime and validation work pressured costs; management expected cost synergies and improved efficiency in subsequent quarters.
  • Management expected 2017 capital expenditures of $15–$17 million, including investment to support growth and facility expansion. It planned a Geneva, Switzerland laboratory in the second half of 2017 and expected growing pharma contract backlog to support future revenue, without providing a quantified revenue forecast.
  • Revenue risks include payer reimbursement pressure, including the Medicare rate reduction, payer mix and test pricing, and collection estimates for non-contracted payers. The company also cited seasonal volume declines and weather-related disruption.
  • Debt bears variable interest rates, although a $50 million interest-rate swap fixes the company’s payment rate at 1.59% on the hedged amount through December 31, 2019. Unhedged debt remains exposed to rate changes. The credit agreement includes leverage and fixed-charge coverage covenants and restrictions on certain transactions.
  • Series A preferred stock had a $25.4 million carrying value and $49.5 million remaining face value. Deemed dividends and amortization of its beneficial conversion feature reduced income attributable to common stockholders by a combined $2.6 million in Q1. Certain future equity proceeds must be used to redeem preferred shares.
  • The company adopted share-based-payment accounting guidance in January 2017 and recorded a $6.6 million increase in deferred tax assets with an offsetting cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. Separately, subsequent to quarter-end, it granted 1.43 million employee and executive options with an estimated $3.9 million fair value.
  • No material changes to the previously disclosed risk factors were reported; the company said current legal proceedings were not material. Management reported disclosure controls effective at a reasonable-assurance level and no material change in internal control during the quarter.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the post-quarter normalization of billing and receivables produces improved collections and operating cash flow.
  • Whether bad debt expense declines as management expects, given the increased receivable balance and aging profile.
  • Whether clinical volume growth can offset lower average revenue per test, reimbursement reductions and margin pressure.
  • Whether laboratory consolidation delivers the anticipated savings, and whether Geneva expansion and planned capital spending remain on schedule and within the stated range.
  • Debt availability, covenant headroom and interest-rate exposure, including the effect of variable rates on unhedged borrowings.
  • The continuing cost and dilution implications of preferred-stock accretion, future preferred redemptions and the April 2017 option grant.