ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2017

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. — Q1 2017 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period

Unaudited results cover the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with Q1 2016; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2016. Orrstown is a Pennsylvania-based community banking company operating Orrstown Bank and investment-adviser subsidiary Wheatland, acquired in December 2016. The Bank had 25 branches in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Unless otherwise noted, dollar amounts below are in millions.

Financial performance and condition

  • Profit: Net income was $2.00 million, down 22.4% from $2.58 million. Diluted EPS was $0.24 versus $0.32; dividends per share were $0.10 versus $0.08.
  • Interest income and margin: Interest and dividend income was $11.83 million versus $9.96 million. Net interest income rose 18.3% to $10.24 million. On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest margin increased to 3.35% from 3.06%, and spread rose to 3.27% from 2.98%.
  • Other income and expenses: Noninterest income was $4.34 million versus $5.67 million, principally reflecting securities gains of just $0.003 million versus $1.42 million a year earlier. Excluding securities gains, noninterest income rose 2.0%. Noninterest expense increased 9.2% to $12.15 million, with salaries and benefits up 19.7%. The efficiency ratio improved to 79.7% from 82.6%. The effective tax rate was 17.5% versus 19.2%.
  • Loans and credit: Loans reached $901.33 million, up $17.94 million, or 2.0%, from year-end; commercial real estate provided about half the increase. The allowance for loan losses was $12.67 million, or 1.41% of loans. No loan-loss provision was recorded, while net charge-offs were $0.107 million. Nonperforming assets were $7.40 million, 0.51% of assets, broadly unchanged from year-end and below $16.40 million a year earlier. Foreclosed real estate increased to $1.02 million from $0.35 million, mainly following a commercial-property foreclosure.
  • Balance sheet and funding: Total assets were $1.454 billion, up from $1.415 billion at year-end. Deposits increased 2.7% to $1.184 billion. Short-term borrowings rose to $113.41 million from $87.86 million, while long-term debt fell to $4.08 million from $24.16 million after $20.09 million of repayments. Shareholders’ equity was $137.47 million.
  • Cash flow and liquidity: Operating activities provided $3.93 million; investing activities used $41.78 million, including $64.54 million of securities purchases and $18.74 million of net loan growth; financing activities provided $36.13 million. Cash and cash equivalents ended at $28.55 million versus $30.27 million at year-end. Management identifies deposits, loan repayments, securities maturities and sales, mortgage-loan sales, and FHLB advances as funding sources.
  • Capital: The Bank was reported well capitalized. At March 31, its total risk-based capital ratio was 13.1%, CET1 ratio 11.9%, and Tier 1 leverage ratio 8.3%.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Net interest income grew strongly, supported by higher average loan and securities balances and improved asset yields; the cost of interest-bearing funding also increased.
  • Net income declined despite higher net interest income, primarily because Q1 2016 included $1.42 million in securities gains and Q1 2017 expenses were higher. Management attributed salary and occupancy increases to expansion, additional staff, and facilities.
  • Asset quality improved year over year: total nonperforming and other risk assets were $8.32 million versus $17.45 million at March 31, 2016. Management attributed much of the decline to a loan sale in Q4 2016.
  • Available-for-sale securities rose to $423.60 million from $400.15 million at year-end. The company sold securities and redeployed proceeds into higher-yielding investments; Q1 2017 securities sales produced only $0.003 million net gains versus $1.42 million in Q1 2016.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • No numerical earnings or balance-sheet guidance was provided. Management described the economic outlook as somewhat brighter, citing improving confidence and growth conditions, while noting interest-rate and economic uncertainty. It intends to pursue loan and balance-sheet growth, fee-based revenue growth, and risk-asset reduction; results are not assured.
  • Interest-rate modeling estimated that a 100-basis-point rate decline would reduce next-12-month net interest income by 5.8%, while a 200-basis-point increase would reduce it by 3.4%. Estimated net present value declined 4.9% and 6.2%, respectively, under those scenarios. These model estimates depend on uncertain assumptions.
  • Credit risk is concentrated in the company’s south-central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland markets and includes material commercial real estate exposure. Management cautioned that loan growth or changing conditions could require future allowance provisions. AFS securities had $4.11 million of gross unrealized losses; management said it did not intend, and was not likely required, to sell affected securities before recovery.
  • A securities class action remains pending. Some Exchange Act claims survived dismissal, discovery is ongoing, and trial was scheduled for October 2018. The company disputes the allegations; it said potential losses could not then be reasonably estimated. Separately, a 2016 SEC settlement concerning accounting matters for 2010–2011 included a $1.0 million company penalty, previously reserved and expensed.
  • Management reported disclosure controls effective at March 31, 2017, with no material first-quarter change in internal control over financial reporting. The filing reported no material change in risk factors from the 2016 Form 10-K.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth and improved asset-quality measures persist, especially in commercial real estate, and whether the allowance remains adequate.
  • Whether deposit costs, borrowing needs, and interest-rate sensitivity affect net interest margin and earnings in subsequent quarters.
  • Whether expansion-related staffing and occupancy expenses generate sufficient revenue growth to sustain efficiency improvements.
  • Developments in the unresolved securities litigation and any resulting financial exposure.
  • Execution of securities reinvestment and liquidity plans, including the effect of market-rate changes on securities values and funding.