Otter Tail Corp quarterly report, Q2 FY2011

Otter Tail Corporation — Q2 2011 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Unaudited consolidated results. The company operates electric utility and diversified nonelectric businesses.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2011Q2 2010Six months 2011Six months 2010
Operating revenue$317.0m$251.3m$598.3m$494.3m
Operating income (loss)$14.6m$(15.2)m$30.5m$(1.0)m
Continuing-operations net income (loss)$6.0m$(16.3)m$11.6m$(12.8)m
Total net income (loss)$18.8m$(14.2)m$24.5m$(9.5)m
Diluted EPS, continuing operations$0.16$(0.46)$0.31$(0.37)
Diluted EPS, total$0.51$(0.40)$0.66$(0.28)

Operating margin was approximately 4.6% in Q2 and 5.1% for the first half, versus losses in the comparable 2010 periods. Total net income includes discontinued operations and the gain on the sale of Idaho Pacific Holdings (IPH); continuing results are a clearer indicator of ongoing operations.

Six-month cash from operating activities was $40.7m, down from $49.4m; continuing-operations operating cash flow was $40.7m versus $49.8m. Capital expenditures were $48.1m, compared with $38.6m. Cash from investing activities was $33.3m, including $84.4m net sale proceeds from discontinued operations. Financing activities used $73.7m, principally reflecting repayment of short-term borrowings. Cash and cash equivalents were zero at June 30.

At June 30, short-term debt was $30.4m, current maturities of long-term debt $3.3m, and long-term debt net of current maturities $433.7m. Total short- and long-term debt including current maturities was $469.8m. Credit facilities totaled $370m, with $334.6m available after borrowings and letters-of-credit restrictions. Total assets were $1.71bn. Common dividends remained $0.2975 per share quarterly; management said the payout ratio had exceeded 100% in each of the prior three years.

Changes and operating drivers

  • Revenue rose 26% in Q2 and 21% for the first half, largely from higher nonelectric sales. Growth came from wind tower production, manufacturing, construction and PVC pipe; electric revenue was nearly flat.
  • Wind Energy remained loss-making: operating losses were $6.7m in Q2 and $12.7m for the first half, versus $2.7m and $0.8m, respectively, in 2010. DMI cited rework, underutilized capacity, quality-control spending and steel-supply issues.
  • Manufacturing returned to operating income, partly because the prior-year periods included a $19.7m asset impairment charge. Construction and Plastics also improved. Health Services revenue declined, although lower equipment rental costs supported operating income.
  • IPH was sold May 6, 2011 for approximately $87m cash; the sale generated a $16.8m pretax gain and $13.3m after-tax gain. Proceeds, net of escrow, were used to reduce borrowings. Wylie exited its wind-heavy-haul business, reported as discontinued operations.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management lowered 2011 EPS guidance to $0.42–$0.94 from continuing operations and $0.72–$1.30 including discontinued operations, the IPH sale gain and Wylie wind-heavy-haul results. The wind segment outlook worsened; management cited softer tower demand, expected lower production, pricing pressure, and possible warranty, remediation or liquidated-damages exposure. Wind Energy backlog was $82m.
  • Management forecast electric-segment capital expenditures of $67m in 2011, $130m in 2012 and $219m in 2013, including transmission and environmental work. Estimated Big Stone air-quality-control project cost was $490m, of which OTP’s share was $264m; regulatory prudence reviews were pending.
  • Minnesota’s rate-case order authorized about $5m, or 3.76%, in base-rate revenue increases, while changes to recovery mechanisms implied an overall customer increase of about 1.6%. OTP accrued an estimated $3.9m interim-rate refund, expected to be distributed in Q4 2011.
  • On July 29, 2011, OTP agreed to issue $140m of 4.63% senior notes due 2021, expected to close December 1, subject to conditions. Proceeds are intended partly to refinance $90m of 6.63% notes due December 2011 and $10.4m of bonds due 2012.
  • Key exposures include wind-tower quality and warranty claims (warranty reserve $3.0m), contract execution and customer concentration (one DMI customer represented 11.7% of first-half consolidated revenue), environmental regulation, fuel and material costs, and capital-market access. The filing states potential losses across certain contingencies could reach $9m. OTP also reported a dispute concerning the Bemidji transmission project; a preliminary injunction was issued in June.

Investor verification priorities

  • Reconcile reported total EPS and earnings to continuing operations, the IPH disposal gain, and discontinued-business losses.
  • Track DMI production, margins, backlog, customer concentration, and any warranty, remediation or liquidated-damages developments.
  • Verify the closing and use of proceeds for OTP’s planned $140m note issuance and monitor debt covenant headroom; the company reported compliance, but some coverage ratios were relatively close to minimums.
  • Monitor the Big Stone environmental project’s final cost, OTP’s share, regulatory approvals and recoverability through rates.
  • Assess whether operating cash flow, planned utility investment and earnings growth can support the dividend and forecast capital expenditures; management noted the historical payout ratio exceeded 100%.