SHORE BANCSHARES INC annual report, FY2011

Shore Bancshares, Inc. — 2011 Form 10-K

Business context and reporting period. This annual report covers the year ended December 31, 2011; fourth-quarter figures are unaudited. Shore Bancshares is a Maryland-based financial holding company with community banking and insurance businesses concentrated on Maryland’s Eastern Shore and in Delaware. Felton Bank merged into CNB effective January 1, 2011.

Financial performance and condition

Unless noted otherwise, amounts are in millions of dollars.

Metric20112010
Net interest income$39.8$42.6
Provision for credit losses$19.5$21.1
Noninterest income$17.3$18.0
Noninterest expense$39.2$41.7
Net loss$(0.9)$(1.7)
Basic and diluted loss per share$(0.11)$(0.20)
Net interest margin3.74%4.02%
Assets at year-end$1,158.2$1,130.3
Loans at year-end$841.1$895.4
Deposits at year-end$1,009.9$979.5
Stockholders’ equity at year-end$121.2$122.5
  • Fourth quarter: net interest income was $9.8 million, provision for credit losses $4.0 million, pretax income $416,000 and net income $325,000 (diluted EPS $0.04).
  • Credit quality: net charge-offs were $19.4 million, or 2.22% of average loans, versus $17.8 million and 1.96% in 2010. Nonperforming assets rose to $88.7 million from $69.6 million; nonaccrual loans were $51.4 million, and nonperforming assets were 7.66% of total assets. The allowance was $14.3 million, 1.64% of average loans and 28% of nonaccrual loans.
  • Cash flow and liquidity: operating cash flow was $21.9 million; cash and cash equivalents increased $49.8 million to $127.7 million. The loan-to-deposit ratio improved to 83.3% from 91.4%. Additional reported liquidity sources included $15.5 million in correspondent lines and approximately $31.6 million of FHLB availability.
  • Funding and debt: year-end short-term borrowings were $17.8 million and long-term debt $455,000. Deposits funded the majority of operations; average deposits rose 1.2% in 2011.
  • Capital: the Company reported Tier 1 risk-based capital of 12.55%, total risk-based capital of 13.80% and leverage of 9.29%. The Banks were each classified as well capitalized.

Material changes versus 2010

  • The net loss narrowed by $770,000, principally because goodwill and intangible impairment charges fell by $1.7 million and the credit-loss provision declined by $1.6 million. These improvements were partly offset by a $2.9 million decrease in net interest income.
  • Net interest margin contracted 28 basis points. Lower loan balances and yields reduced interest income; lower deposit costs partly offset that pressure.
  • Loans declined 6.1%, including a 16.7% decrease in construction loans. Nonperforming assets increased approximately $19.1 million, driven by higher nonaccrual real estate loans and foreclosed assets.
  • Noninterest expense fell 6.1%, including lower impairment, salary and FDIC insurance costs. Noninterest income declined 4.0%, with lower insurance commissions and deposit service charges partly offset by $563,000 of securities gains.
  • Common dividends were reduced to $0.01 per share quarterly beginning with the May 2011 payment; total dividends were $760,000 versus $2.0 million in 2010. Dividends paid exceeded earnings in both years.
  • The Company repurchased its Treasury warrant for $25,000 in November 2011, concluding its TARP Capital Purchase Program participation. The 2011 available-for-sale securities portfolio increased to $129.8 million from $99.1 million.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No quantified earnings or operating guidance is provided. Management described continued weakness in local economic, real estate and construction markets, which had impaired borrowers, collateral values and loan performance; management could not predict when or whether conditions would improve.
  • Key exposures include geographic and commercial real estate/construction concentration, further credit losses or allowance increases, interest-rate and funding risks, competition, and rising regulatory and compliance costs. Management noted potential heightened supervisory scrutiny related to CRE concentrations.
  • The Company had a negative one-year interest-rate gap of $34.5 million. Its model estimated net interest income would rise 3.0% with an immediate 100-basis-point rate increase and fall 1.4% with a 100-basis-point decrease; actual effects may differ.
  • Goodwill and intangible impairment charges were $1.344 million in 2011, primarily in retail insurance. Other notable credit-related items included $10.7 million transferred from loans to foreclosed real estate and $1.2 million in losses on sales of foreclosed property.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments to extend credit and letters of credit totaled $147.5 million. Management did not consider these arrangements or current litigation expected to have a material adverse effect. Banks’ deposits were insured, and the filing states the banks were well capitalized.
  • Management and the independent auditor concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011; the auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether rising nonaccrual loans, charge-offs and foreclosed assets are stabilizing, and whether the $14.3 million allowance remains adequate against future losses.
  • How concentrated and collateral-sensitive the real estate portfolio is, including CRE and construction exposure, and whether supervisory action or higher capital needs arise.
  • Whether core deposits remain stable and the reported liquidity facilities and cash resources are available on acceptable terms.
  • Whether margin pressure, loan contraction and insurance commission trends continue, and how much earnings rely on securities gains or other nonrecurring items.
  • Whether the reduced dividend is sustainable given losses, capital needs and regulatory limits; dividends are discretionary and the filing notes they exceeded earnings in 2011 and 2010.
  • Reconcile cash-flow and liquidity measures with the audited financial statements and notes, and review the detailed segment results and subsequent-period disclosures.