TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD annual report, Q4 FY2016

Tantech Holdings Ltd. — FY2016 Form 20-F

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. This is an annual report, not a standalone fourth-quarter filing; the text does not provide clear Q4-only results. Financial statements are audited under U.S. GAAP. Friedman LLP issued an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements, but did not audit internal controls.

Business context and financial performance

Tantech manufactures bamboo-charcoal consumer products, EDLC carbon and barbecue charcoal, and conducts a smaller trading business. Its operations are predominantly in China; management estimates about 90% of products are ultimately consumed domestically and 10% internationally.

Metric (US$ unless noted)FY2016FY2015Change
Revenue$47.67 million$58.83 millionDown 19.0%
Gross profit / margin$13.54 million / 28.4%$16.88 million / 28.7%Profit down 19.8%; margin down 0.3 percentage points
Operating expenses$7.25 million$6.67 millionUp 8.7%
Operating income / margin$6.30 million / 13.2%$10.21 million / 17.4%Income down 38.4%
Net income$4.61 million$8.93 millionDown 48.4%
Net income attributable to common stockholders$4.30 million; $0.19 per share$8.44 million; $0.40 per shareDown 49.1%
Operating cash flow$(7.03) million$4.45 millionShifted to cash use
Cash and cash equivalents, year-end$5.94 million$6.27 millionDown $0.33 million

Revenue mix and key movements

  • Consumer products: $39.98 million, down from $43.24 million; 83.9% of revenue. Segment gross margin fell to 30.7% from 33.8%, with higher material costs in purification and deodorization products.
  • Energy: $7.13 million, down from $12.02 million; 14.9% of revenue. EDLC carbon sales fell to $5.71 million from $11.39 million; volume declined to 220 tons from 367 tons and average selling price fell 16.4% to about $25,933 per ton. International BBQ charcoal sales increased to about $1.43 million from $0.63 million.
  • Trading: $0.55 million, down from $3.58 million. The company exited lower-margin non-Charcoal Doctor domestic trading activity.
  • Management attributed the overall decline principally to reduced domestic barbecue-charcoal sales following supply disruption and loss of a major supplier, weaker consumer-product orders, and lower EDLC volume and pricing amid competition and softer demand.

Liquidity, debt and cash flow

  • Year-end current assets were $63.66 million and current liabilities $14.10 million; working capital was about $49.56 million and the current ratio 4.51. Total assets were $94.30 million and total equity $80.21 million.
  • Cash from operations was negative $7.03 million. Main working-capital uses included a $3.19 million increase in accounts receivable and an $11.44 million increase in supplier advances. The company said it extended some large customers’ payment terms to 9–12 months; year-end receivables had 307 days’ sales outstanding. About $8.9 million, or 21% of year-end receivables, was collected by March 31, 2017, according to the financial-statement note.
  • Financing provided $9.06 million, including $7.96 million net proceeds from a private placement, alongside borrowing and repayment activity. Investing used $1.88 million, including acquisition-related deposits.
  • Year-end short-term bank loans were $6.69 million, bank acceptance notes payable $1.73 million, and loans from third parties $0.85 million: total contractual obligations of $9.27 million, all due within one year. Bank loans are secured by company property. Management believed working capital would support operations for at least 12 months, while noting no material unused liquidity sources.
  • Restricted cash was $0.33 million. The company’s bank deposits in China and Hong Kong were not insured. PRC subsidiary cash and dividends are subject to statutory reserve and foreign-exchange restrictions.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Suzhou E-Motors acquisition: The company expected to acquire a majority interest, rather than the originally contemplated 100%, due to government restrictions. It had paid about $10.4 million and issued 2.5 million restricted shares held in escrow; the final interest, consideration and share count remained subject to determination. The filing expected completion in Q2 2017, while another section anticipated consummation by the end of June. The transaction had not closed as of the report. A $10.42 million business-acquisition deposit was recorded at year-end.
  • EDLC outlook: Management described tougher competition, weaker sales and delayed or stricter government support and industry policies. It was seeking technology partners and new applications. It reported process improvements, including a voltage-resistance capability above 2.85V in one product, but provided no quantified revenue guidance.
  • Operating risks: Supplier concentration increased: four suppliers represented about 88% of purchases, and the company could no longer buy from a former major supplier after local environmental enforcement closed charcoal kilns. A $8.64 million long-term advance to a supplier was intended to secure at least 13,000 tons of raw material annually at a fixed price for three years. Supplier advances carried increased credit-loss allowances.
  • Customer and channel concentration: Seven largest customers accounted for about 55% of FY2016 revenue; distributors represented about 78% of sales. Two customers each exceeded 10% of revenue. Extended payment terms and concentrated receivables heighten collection and cash-flow risk.
  • Other income and expenses: Government subsidies fell to $52,597 from $326,018 and were one-time grants. Other income fell to $106,346 from $1.09 million, largely due to lower patent-related consulting fees. General and administrative expense rose 27.4%, including higher supplier-advance impairment expense and Suzhou acquisition consulting costs.
  • Related-party guarantee: The company had pledged a building with about $4.0 million net book value to guarantee Forasen Group credit exposure reported at $8.65 million. The guarantee expired April 8, 2017; the filing stated no additional guarantee had been made as of its date.
  • Subsequent financing: A February 2017 agreement provided for a $2.0 million, one-year note at 7% interest, potentially convertible after six months at a discount to the share price, subject to a stated price floor. Conversion could dilute shareholders.
  • Controls and currency: Management concluded disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were ineffective, citing insufficient U.S. GAAP-skilled accounting staff and audit adjustments. Remediation plans included outside consultants and stronger procedures. Currency translation losses were $5.45 million in 2016; the company did not hedge currency exposure.
  • Management cited Chinese economic weakness, raw-material cost and availability, consumer demand, EDLC market adoption, regulatory and currency controls, and execution of its EV expansion as risks. No formal numerical FY2017 revenue or earnings guidance was provided.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether receivables and supplier advances were collected, recovered or converted into delivered raw materials after year-end, and whether allowances were adequate.
  • The status, final purchase terms, ownership percentage, escrowed shares and funding requirements of the Suzhou E-Motors transaction.
  • Supplier performance under the three-year supply agreement, the recoverability of its $8.64 million advance, and the effect of environmental closures on supply and cost.
  • EDLC customer demand, pricing, competitive position and the commercial results of claimed product improvements and partnership efforts.
  • Near-term repayment or refinancing of debt and acceptance notes, collateral exposure, and any renewal or replacement of the expired Forasen guarantee.
  • Progress in remediating material weaknesses in internal controls, including whether subsequent filings report improved control effectiveness.
  • Share-count and dilution details: the filing reports 26,811,935 shares issued but 24,311,935 outstanding at year-end because 2.5 million acquisition shares were held in escrow; the acquisition’s final share consideration remained unsettled.