Talen Energy Corp quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Talen Energy Corporation / Talen Energy Supply — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Figures are in millions of dollars except per-share data. The combined filing covers both registrants; Talen Energy Corporation’s results before June 1 reflect predecessor Talen Energy Supply. From June 1, results include RJS Power for one month. Comparisons with 2014 are therefore not fully like-for-like.

Business context and key financial metrics

Talen is a competitive power generation and energy-marketing company operating primarily in PJM and ERCOT. On June 1, 2015, PPL completed Talen’s spinoff and Riverstone contributed RJS Power in exchange for 35% of Talen Energy Corporation’s common stock. Talen reported East and West segments following the transactions.

MetricQ2 2015Q2 2014Six months 2015Six months 2014
Operating revenue$1,065$1,007$2,011$52
Operating income (loss)$34$16$212$(63)
Net income (loss)$26$13$122$(53)
EPS$0.26$0.16$1.34$(0.63)
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$171$126$408$361
Margins (non-GAAP)$406$372$834$815

The six-month revenue comparison is especially distorted by derivative accounting: 2014 wholesale energy revenue included large mark-to-market losses, while energy purchases included offsetting gains. Adjusted EBITDA and margins are management-defined non-GAAP measures and should be considered alongside GAAP results. Q2 interest expense was $55; six-month interest expense was $91. Q2 income taxes included benefits from tax matters, contributing to an unusually low effective tax burden.

Six-month operating cash flow was $355, versus $290 a year earlier. Investing cash outflow was $127, and financing cash outflow was $228. Capital spending was $179 for property, plant and equipment and $19 for intangibles; operating cash flow less these expenditures was approximately $157. Cash was $352 at June 30, while restricted cash was $109.

At June 30, total debt was approximately $4,059, including $884 due within one year and $3,175 long-term. Short-term debt was zero. A $1,850 secured revolving facility had $309 of letters of credit outstanding and $1,541 of unused capacity. The company reported $4,826 of equity.

Material changes versus prior period

  • RJS Power added Raven, Jade and Sapphire assets and operations; the acquisition added $1,782 of PP&E, provisional goodwill of $398 and assumed $1,250 of senior notes. RJS contributed $102 of revenue and $14 of net income from acquisition through June 30, including Sapphire, which is reported as discontinued operations.
  • Q2 Adjusted EBITDA rose to $171 from $126; six-month Adjusted EBITDA increased to $408 from $361. Management attributed improvement primarily to portfolio optimization, improved spark spreads, nuclear generation and the acquired Raven portfolio, partly offset by lower PJM capacity prices.
  • Debt increased from year-end: Talen issued $600 of 6.50% senior notes due 2025 and assumed RJS notes. The RJS notes’ coupon was reduced from 5.125% to 4.625% in July 2015. The new secured revolving facility replaced the former unsecured facility.
  • Balance-sheet assets rose to $12,862 from $10,760, largely reflecting the acquisition. Goodwill increased to $470 from $72.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • In July, Talen agreed to acquire MACH Gen for $1.175 billion, including assumed debt, subject to working-capital adjustments and regulatory approvals. The transaction was expected to close in 2015; committed bridge financing was available as a backstop.
  • FERC mitigation terms require Talen to arrange the divestiture of 1,300–1,400 MW within 12 months after closing of the RJS transaction, and to limit certain retained PJM assets to cost-based energy offers. Sapphire was classified as discontinued operations and held for sale.
  • Management’s East reporting unit failed the first step of its interim goodwill impairment test. The second-step analysis and RJS purchase-price allocation remained in progress; management then estimated no goodwill charge, but stated that adverse valuation changes or further share-price declines could result in impairment. PJM coal assets, with carrying value above $3 billion, were also exposed to potential impairment from weak forward prices and environmental costs.
  • Environmental and regulatory exposures include coal-combustion-residual rules, wastewater requirements, air-emissions standards and climate rules. Talen recorded a $33 increase to asset-retirement obligations related to review of the CCR rule; further revisions were possible. Some potential compliance costs could be significant, and estimates were not available for certain matters.
  • Credit ratings were below investment grade. Moody’s lowered ratings in May but assigned a stable outlook; S&P lowered ratings and placed Talen on CreditWatch with negative implications in July. Derivative contracts may require collateral or termination payments following rating changes. At June 30, estimated additional collateral needs under specified credit features were $16.
  • Other notable items included $25 of accelerated/pro-rated stock compensation, $10 of spinoff-related restructuring costs for the six-month period, and a $7 revenue correction for prior-period billings. Management said the correction was not material to prior statements and was not expected to be material to 2015 full-year results.
  • Projected 2015–2019 capital expenditures totaled $2,397, including $498 for 2015. No earnings guidance was provided; management cautioned that interim results may not indicate full-year performance.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How final RJS purchase accounting and the East goodwill impairment test affect reported assets, earnings and equity.
  • Financing, regulatory approvals, integration costs and expected benefits of the proposed MACH Gen acquisition.
  • Which assets will be sold under the FERC mitigation plan, and the proceeds, timing and operational impact of those divestitures.
  • Cash collateral requirements, covenant headroom, rating developments and access to the revolving and energy-marketing facilities.
  • Potential costs of environmental compliance and the sensitivity of coal-asset values to power and capacity prices.
  • The comparability of reported results: 2015 includes only one month of RJS, while 2014 derivative-related gains and losses materially affected revenue and expenses.