Virginia National Bankshares Corp annual report, FY2015

Virginia National Bankshares Corporation — FY2015 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Year ended December 31, 2015; comparisons are primarily with FY2014. This is an annual filing, not a standalone fourth-quarter report. The company is a Virginia-based bank holding company whose principal operating subsidiary is Virginia National Bank; it also provides wealth-management services through VNB Wealth.

Financial performance and position

MetricFY2015 / year-end 2015FY2014 / year-end 2014
Net income$3.12 million; diluted EPS $1.23$1.90 million; diluted EPS $0.70
Net interest income$16.31 million$14.45 million
Net interest margin3.19%3.07%
Noninterest income$4.87 million$5.60 million
Noninterest expense$16.40 million$17.39 million
Provision for loan losses$463,000$306,000
Total assets$567.5 million$537.1 million
Total loans$423.7 million$313.3 million
Total deposits$486.5 million$456.7 million
Cash and cash equivalents$43.5 million$54.1 million
Shareholders’ equity$56.3 million$60.6 million
  • Net income rose 64.4%. Management attributed the improvement principally to higher interest income and lower noninterest expense.
  • Efficiency ratio improved to 76.6% from 85.7%. Return on average assets was 0.56% versus 0.37%; return on average equity was 5.34% versus 3.16%.
  • Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.54 million, compared with $7.65 million. Investing activities used $43.82 million, largely reflecting loan growth; financing activities provided $27.70 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined $10.58 million during 2015.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $3.57 million, or 0.84% of loans, versus $3.16 million, or 1.01%. Net charge-offs were $60,000, compared with $502,000 in 2014.
  • Regulatory capital remained above minimums: consolidated Tier 1 and total risk-based ratios were 12.60% and 13.39%; the Bank’s were 12.31% and 13.10%. Bank Tier 1 leverage was 9.81%. The Bank was classified as well capitalized.
  • The filing reports no outstanding balances on borrowing lines at year-end; available lines totaled $71.5 million. Repurchase-agreement liabilities were $23.2 million. The filing does not report conventional long-term debt in the balance sheet.

Material changes and operating drivers

  • Loans increased 35.2% year over year, while the loan-to-deposit ratio rose to 87.1% from 68.6%. Growth included approximately $70.7 million of net organic lending, $27.0 million of syndicated loans and $36.4 million of purchased student loans; the student-loan portfolio was supported by a surety bond.
  • Investment securities fell to $76.5 million from $143.4 million as management shifted funds toward higher-yielding loans. The portfolio had $447,000 in gross unrealized gains and $625,000 in gross unrealized losses; management considered the losses temporary and interest-rate-related.
  • Noninterest income declined 13.0%, mainly because trust performance fees fell to $16,000 from $523,000 and royalty income associated with the former fund-management business fell. Increased customer fees and mortgage-sale fees partly offset the decline.
  • Noninterest expense declined 5.7%, reflecting lower salaries and benefits, marketing, professional fees and OREO costs. Staffing was 94 full-time equivalents at year-end, down from 101.
  • The Bank segment earned $3.82 million in 2015, versus $1.77 million. VNB Wealth recorded a $699,000 loss, versus $127,000 of income.
  • The company repurchased 288,497 shares under its program through year-end, including a large purchase from the former fund’s limited partnership. The program authorized up to 400,000 shares and was extended through September 18, 2016.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No numeric earnings, growth or margin guidance is provided. Management expected some downward pressure on loan yields into early 2016 and said a relatively flat yield curve could continue to weigh on results.
  • Key risks include interest-rate and market movements, local economic conditions, borrower performance, intense loan and deposit competition, credit concentrations, and regulatory and consumer-compliance requirements. Management also highlighted continuing cybersecurity threats.
  • Credit quality indicators were generally favorable: three non-accrual loans totaled $191,000; there were no loans 90 days past due and still accruing. Classified assets rose to $8.5 million from $4.9 million, while the allowance ratio declined partly because of portfolio growth and loans requiring little or no reserve.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments included $106.4 million of unfunded lines of credit, $15.2 million of ACH exposure and $6.5 million of letters of credit. Management did not anticipate material losses from these commitments.
  • The remaining $1.2 million OREO property reported at year-end 2014 was sold during 2015; year-end 2015 OREO was zero. A subsequent event was VNB Wealth’s February 2016 purchase of client relationships valued at $31.5 million for a $1.2 million purchase price payable over five years.
  • Auditors issued an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Management reported effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting; the auditor did not provide an internal-control attestation.

Investor facts to verify

  • Whether rapid loan growth, including syndicated and purchased student loans, can be sustained without weakening underwriting or asset quality.
  • How the lower allowance-to-loans ratio and increase in classified assets reconcile with management’s credit-risk assessment and reserve methodology.
  • Whether loan growth and the higher loan-to-deposit ratio affect funding costs, liquidity, and capital as the securities portfolio shrinks.
  • Whether the wealth-management business can restore profitability after lower performance fees and the FY2015 segment loss.
  • The performance and accounting treatment of the February 2016 client-relationship acquisition, and the effect of ongoing share repurchases and dividends on capital and shareholder returns.
  • Potential sensitivity to interest-rate changes and the assumptions underlying management’s net-interest-income simulations.