AES CORP annual report, FY2016

AES Corporation 2016 Form 10-K Summary

Business context and reporting period

The filing is AES Corporation’s annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed February 24, 2017. AES is a diversified global power-generation and utility company operating through six strategic business units: US, Andes, Brazil, MCAC, Europe, and Asia. Its portfolio includes thermal, hydro, wind, solar, biomass, energy-storage, transmission, and distribution assets.

AES reported approximately 30,379 MW of generation capacity, including 8,228 MW of renewable capacity, and utility businesses serving approximately 9.4 million people. The company brought nine projects totaling 2,976 MW online during 2016 and had 3,389 MW under construction, representing approximately $6.4 billion of total project capital expenditures.

Key financial metrics

Metric20162015Change
Revenue$13.586 billion$14.155 billionDown 4%
Operating margin$2.433 billion$2.858 billionDown 15%
Income from continuing operations$361 million$787 millionDown 54%
Income from continuing operations attributable to AES$8 million$331 millionDown 98%
Net income attributable to AES$(1.130) billion$306 millionTurned to loss
Diluted EPS$(1.71)$0.44Declined
Adjusted EPS$0.98$1.25Down 22%
Net cash from operating activities$2.884 billion$2.134 billionUp 35%
Proportional free cash flow$1.417 billion$1.241 billionUp 14%
Capital expenditures$2.345 billion$2.308 billionUp $37 million
Cash and cash equivalents$1.305 billion$1.257 billionUp $48 million

Operating margin was 17.9% of revenue, compared with 20.2% in 2015. The decline in GAAP earnings primarily reflected $1.096 billion of asset impairment expense and a $1.119 billion after-tax loss from discontinued operations, principally related to the sale of AES Sul in Brazil. The filing does not present a meaningful diluted continuing-operations EPS value because the attributable amount was approximately zero.

Segment performance and material changes

Segment2016 revenueRevenue change2016 operating margin
US$3.429 billionDown 5%$582 million
Andes$2.506 billionUp 1%$634 million
Brazil$3.755 billionDown 3%$239 million
MCAC$2.172 billionDown 8%$523 million
Europe$918 millionDown 23%$259 million
Asia$752 millionUp 10%$170 million
  • US operating margin declined 6%, driven by lower wholesale prices, reduced DPL capacity and other revenues, weaker wind performance, and higher Southland depreciation. IPL benefited from environmental revenues and a new rate order.
  • Andes operating margin increased 3%, supported by Cochrane’s start-up and lower energy and fuel purchase prices, partly offset by lower spot prices in Colombia, foreign-exchange effects, and higher costs in Argentina.
  • Brazil operating margin declined 60%, primarily due to lower Tietê contract rates, the reversal of a favorable Eletropaulo regulatory liability in 2015, higher Eletropaulo costs, lower demand, and the non-operation of Uruguaiana in 2016.
  • MCAC operating margin declined 4%, reflecting lower margins in Mexico and El Salvador and construction expenses in Panama, partly offset by stronger Dominican Republic contracted and spot sales.
  • Europe operating margin declined 15%, primarily because of Kazakhstan foreign-exchange effects and lower contracted capacity prices at Maritza. Cash flow improved materially because Maritza collected overdue receivables from NEK.
  • Asia operating margin increased 14%, principally because Mong Duong operated for a full year compared with partial operations in 2015.

Cash flow, debt, liquidity, and capital allocation

  • Operating cash flow increased to $2.884 billion, mainly because of higher collections at Eletropaulo and AES Sul, settlement of overdue Maritza receivables, lower working-capital needs at Mong Duong, and other timing effects.
  • Capital expenditures totaled $2.345 billion, comprising $1.510 billion of growth investments, $617 million of maintenance spending, and $218 million of environmental spending.
  • Consolidated debt was approximately $20.5 billion at year-end, consisting of $15.8 billion of non-recourse debt and $4.7 billion of recourse debt. Approximately $3.5 billion of debt carried unhedged variable-rate exposure.
  • Parent Company liquidity was $894 million, consisting of $100 million of parent and qualified holding-company cash and $794 million of available borrowing capacity.
  • Current non-recourse debt totaled approximately $1.3 billion, including $128 million related to technical covenant defaults at Kavarna and Sogrinsk. These were not payment defaults and did not trigger a parent-company cross-default at year-end.
  • Parent Company debt was reduced and refinanced during 2016. AES issued $500 million of 6.0% senior notes due 2026 and redeemed or repaid higher-cost or earlier-maturing debt.
  • AES used $312 million to prepay and refinance Parent Company debt, returned $369 million to shareholders through dividends and repurchases, and invested $394 million in subsidiaries. It repurchased 8.7 million shares for $79 million.
  • The quarterly dividend increased to $0.12 per share beginning in the first quarter of 2017. The company paid $0.44 per share during 2016 and declared $0.45 per share for the year.

Guidance, outlook, management commentary, and unusual items

  • Management expects growth to be weighted toward wind, solar, natural gas, LNG infrastructure, and energy storage. AES reported more than 400 MW of battery storage in operation, under construction, or advanced development.
  • The company’s $150 million cost-reduction and revenue-enhancement program generated $50 million of savings in 2016; management expected the program to reach $150 million of cumulative savings in 2018.
  • Alto Maipo in Chile experienced construction difficulties and projected costs increased by up to 22% from the original $2 billion budget. AES and project stakeholders agreed on the basis of a restructuring in January 2017, but financing and definitive restructuring terms remained subject to negotiation.
  • Management expected the 531 MW Alto Maipo project to reach commercial operation in the first half of 2019, subject to restructuring and financing.
  • In January 2017 AES agreed to sell its Kazakhstan coal-fired CHP assets, with an expected combined impairment and loss on sale of approximately $125 million in the first half of 2017.
  • In February 2017 AES and AIMCo agreed to acquire sPower for $853 million in cash plus assumed non-recourse debt. The transaction was expected to close in the third quarter of 2017 and could require a reverse termination fee of up to $75 million.
  • In 2016 AES recorded $859 million of DPL impairments and $236 million of Buffalo Gap I and II impairments, driven by lower forward power prices, weaker capacity expectations, regulatory uncertainty, environmental costs, and lower wind production.
  • The sale of AES Sul generated an after-tax impairment and disposal loss of approximately $1.119 billion, including a $737 million after-tax loss on sale.
  • Material risks include high leverage, refinancing and liquidity needs, restrictions on subsidiary distributions, foreign-exchange and commodity volatility, hydrology and weather, counterparty credit, regulatory and tariff decisions, environmental compliance, litigation, construction execution, and potential asset impairments.
  • Management estimated reasonably possible losses from material contingencies at $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion, excluding accrued liabilities. Recorded litigation liabilities were approximately $179 million.
  • Significant legal and regulatory matters include Eletropaulo’s Eletrobrás dispute, EPA New Source Review matters involving IPL, environmental proceedings, tax disputes, and land-use claims involving AES Panama. Outcomes and potential losses are uncertain.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether operating cash flow remains strong after adjusting for receivable collections, regulatory-asset timing, and other working-capital effects.
  • Progress and final financing terms for the Alto Maipo restructuring, including any additional AES equity requirements and cost overruns.
  • Execution and financing of the sPower acquisition and the expected impact on leverage and renewable capacity.
  • Future cash requirements for approximately $20.5 billion of consolidated debt, including $1.339 billion of scheduled non-recourse maturities in 2017.
  • Resolution of subsidiary covenant defaults, particularly whether any default becomes material enough to restrict distributions or trigger parent-level consequences.
  • Potential additional impairments at DPL, Buffalo Gap, other coal assets, and wind assets if power prices, capacity prices, regulation, or operating performance weaken.
  • Regulatory outcomes for DP&L’s ESP 3 and distribution rate cases, IPL cost recovery, and environmental compliance programs.
  • Collectability of long-term receivables, including approximately $236 million due from Argentine-related arrangements.
  • Exposure to reasonably possible litigation and regulatory losses of $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion, including the Eletrobrás and AES Panama matters.
  • Whether dividends and share repurchases remain sustainable given Parent Company liquidity, debt covenants, and the ability of subsidiaries to distribute cash.